E-International Scientific Research JournalISSN: 2094-1749 Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 2010Path AnalysisTable 1 shows both <strong>the</strong> direct and indirect impacts of climatological variables on <strong>the</strong>Tourism Industry in <strong>the</strong> province over <strong>the</strong> period.Table 1. Impact of Climatological Variables to TourismVariables Direct Impact Indirect Impact + Indirect Impact = Indirect ImpactVia Energy Via Health To TourismTemperature 0.404 0.034 + -0.036 = -0.002Rainfall 0.0508 0.136 + -0.026 = 0.110Total: 0.0912 0.080Grand Impact = = 0.912 + 0.080 = 17.12 %Table 2 shows <strong>the</strong> direct and indirect impacts of climatological variables on <strong>the</strong>Agriculture IndustryTable 2. Impact of Climatological Variables to Agriculture IndustryVariables Direct Impact Indirect Impact + Indirect Impact = Indirect ImpactVia Energy Via Health To AgricultureTemperature -0.125 0.023 + -0.010 = -0.013Rainfall 0.038 0.061 + -0.006 = 0.055Total: -0.087 0.068Grand Impact = -0.087 + 0.068 = -1.9 %Table 3 shows <strong>the</strong> direct and indirect impacts of climatological variables on <strong>the</strong>Commercial Sector.Table 3. Impact of Climatological Variables to Commercial SectorVariables Direct Impact Indirect Impact + Indirect Impact = Indirect ImpactVia Energy Via Health To CommerceTemperature 0.312 0.009 + -0.048 = -0.039Rainfall 0.207 0.024 + -0.034 = 0.010Total: 0.519 -0.049Grand Impact = 0.519 + -.049= -1.9 %384
E-International Scientific Research JournalISSN: 2094-1749 Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 2010DiscussionsMonthly average records of both temperature and rainfall over <strong>the</strong> twelve – monthperiod were not very erratic except for isolated cases in <strong>the</strong> months of February and March,2010. In January 2010, a high rainfall volume was noted followed by sudden drops in <strong>the</strong>months of February and March, 2010. Of <strong>the</strong> two (temperature or rainfall), <strong>the</strong> rainfall dataappears to be a better gauge for climatological changes for short period of time because of <strong>the</strong>relatively higher variances noted.Likewise, data on energy supply appeared to be stable until <strong>the</strong> months of March, 2010and April, 2010 (not shown) w<strong>here</strong> sudden drops in energy supply were noted. Unfortunately,it was erratic and <strong>the</strong>se months were not covered by <strong>the</strong> present study.Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> data obtained for health showed erratic movement with <strong>the</strong> months ofAugust and September, 2010 showing high incidence of diseases. Such a data characteristic(relatively high variance) is ideal for determining <strong>the</strong> compatibility (or incompatibility) ofdiseases noted with <strong>the</strong> climatological indicators (rainfall and temperature)Extremes in temperature and rainfall adversely affected <strong>the</strong> agricultural sector whichregistered a negative direct impact index of (-8.70%). In particular, just two months of hightemperatures (March, 2010 and April, 2010) already made a pronounced drop in <strong>the</strong> farmers’yield and harvest of agricultural crops. Considering <strong>the</strong> indirect impact of climatologicalconditions (through <strong>the</strong> energy supply and health status), however, temperature and rainfallwere noted to have negligible positive impact of 6.8%. Over all, extremes in temperature andrainfall translates into a drop in farm productivity by about -1.905%.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, changes in both temperature an rainfall had positive direct impact(51.9%) on <strong>the</strong> commercial sector although <strong>the</strong>se jointly had negative negligible indirectimpact (energy + health) on <strong>the</strong> sector (-4.9%). As a whole, <strong>the</strong>se two climatologicalparameters precipitated a general increase in commercial productivity by a little less than 50%(47%). The net positive impact of a variable temperature and rainfall patterns on <strong>the</strong>commercial sector can be explained by <strong>the</strong> corresponding higher demand for consumerproducts that are needed during rainy season or during long stretches of drought e.g. bottledwater, soft drinks, beverages and o<strong>the</strong>rs. Thus, while <strong>the</strong> agricultural sector suffers a set – back(negative impact index) on its productivity due to aberrant wea<strong>the</strong>r patterns, <strong>the</strong> samephenomenon surprisingly spurs more economic activity in <strong>the</strong> commercial sector.Finally, <strong>the</strong> tourism industry, as a general rule, is also positively impacted by <strong>the</strong>observed climatological parameters (rainfall and temperature). A net positive tourism growthof 17.12% was calculated. However, high temperatures tended to damper <strong>the</strong> tourism industry(-0.20%) but such negative impact is easily absorbed by <strong>the</strong> overall robustness of <strong>the</strong> industryto climate change.ConclusionsThe most easily affected economic sector by changes in climatic pattern is <strong>the</strong>agricultural sector which is easily and adversely affected by ei<strong>the</strong>r long stretches of drought or385