13.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the USAID-Kosovo SME and Agriculture - Economic ...

Evaluation of the USAID-Kosovo SME and Agriculture - Economic ...

Evaluation of the USAID-Kosovo SME and Agriculture - Economic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development Associates, Inc.KOSOVO ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (KAP)SMALL FARM SUPPORT PROGRAMSAVE THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION UMBRELLA GRANTBACKGROUNDSave <strong>the</strong> Children (SC) manages a portfolio <strong>of</strong> 18 NGO projects <strong>and</strong> five special initiatives thatsupport grassroots social <strong>and</strong> economic development. This portfolio is under <strong>the</strong> <strong>USAID</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong>Assistance Program (KAP) that is supporting <strong>the</strong> transition to a democratic society <strong>and</strong> a freemarket economy. The objective is to engage communities in activities that promote changes in<strong>the</strong>ir circumstances <strong>and</strong> increased responsibilities as citizens. The five special initiatives arebeing implemented through <strong>the</strong> Small Farm Support (SFS) program with five sub-grants foragricultural projects to address development issues in several agriculture sub-sectors, includingdairy products, meat production, poultry, grains <strong>and</strong> edible oilseed-based industries, fruit <strong>and</strong>vegetable production, <strong>and</strong> in specialty products. These five sub-grants are valued at $3.8m <strong>and</strong>support <strong>the</strong> sustainable adoption <strong>of</strong> improved, appropriate <strong>and</strong> productive technologies byagricultural producers. The objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SFS is to improve farm production so that <strong>the</strong>quantity <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> produce moving to markets <strong>and</strong> processing factories is increased.Increased <strong>and</strong> improved technologies <strong>and</strong> inputs are to be utilized in working with participatingfarmers. The supporting mechanism for this effort was <strong>the</strong> <strong>USAID</strong> supported <strong>Kosovo</strong> BusinessService (KBS) activity, through its’ client base <strong>of</strong> agribusiness clients. Access to <strong>the</strong> processingmarketingchain was to facilitate <strong>the</strong> product to market emphasis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projects under <strong>the</strong> SFSprogram.SC serves as <strong>the</strong> coordinator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SFS program, working in close collaboration with <strong>the</strong> fiveimplementing grantees. These grantees include CARE (dairy products), IRC (fruit production),LOL (sheep production), CECI (vegetable production), <strong>and</strong> IFDC (feed for poultry – maizesoybean <strong>and</strong> sunflower). SC’s task was to assist <strong>the</strong>se grantees in rapid start-up <strong>and</strong>implementation <strong>of</strong> activities, given that <strong>the</strong> time frame for completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir individualobjectives was limited to 18-20 months. SC provided assistance in <strong>the</strong> initial assessments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sub-sectors <strong>and</strong> in setting targets that were deemed achievable within <strong>the</strong> project time frame. Inits’ role as program coordinator, SC initiated regular meetings with <strong>the</strong> implementing grantees,that have continued through <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> this evaluation. Field visits <strong>and</strong> participation in selectedproject organized workshops enables SC staff to remain knowledgeable about project activities,progress <strong>and</strong> problems.SC coordinated <strong>the</strong> initial meetings with KBS for <strong>the</strong> cooperation between producers <strong>and</strong>agribusiness clients to serve as markets for participating farmers produce. The particular case forthis cooperation involved <strong>the</strong> fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetable producers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> PROGRES ProcessingFactory. This is described in more detail in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IRC <strong>and</strong> CECI sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>evaluation, but in summary this marketing link has not been successful for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons,including <strong>the</strong> business problems that PROGRES is experiencing <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>the</strong> KBSdiscontinued its’ working relationship with PROGRES. Never<strong>the</strong>less, SC seems committed toworking with <strong>the</strong> grantees to seek <strong>and</strong> encourage o<strong>the</strong>r possible production-marketing links for<strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> participating farmers.<strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>USAID</strong>/<strong>Kosovo</strong> <strong>SME</strong> 90 May 2004<strong>and</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>/Agribusiness ProgramsVolume I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!