Sam Ziemann From - Region of Waterloo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

last time the well was inspected in 1995. The log also confirms the depth of the main cavernousfeature from 58.0 m – 60.9 m.Photo: 1 Buildup on CasingPhoto: 2 Foreign Object in Well (Wire)Photo: 3 Top of Foreign Object (Pipe)Photo: 4 Bottom of Well with Object (Pipe)ConclusionsThis well should be abandoned. The scrap piece of wire can be easily removed and this shouldbe done prior to abandonment. The small section of pipe should also be removed if possible.Lotowater recommends abandoning the well using a combination of bentonite gravel andconcrete.Please contact me if you have any questions.Yours sincerely,Lotowater Technical Services Inc.Boyd Pendleton, B.Sc., P.Geo.Senior Project Manager2 of 2
TABLE 1REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOOWell K15Static Video Summary2011/02/10Elapsed Time Depth Depth(h:min) (ft below MP) (m below MP)CommentsDVD 1 of 20:00 0' 0" 0.0 Top of casing0:00 0' 6" 0.2 Wires0:01 6' 8" 2.0 Pitless adapter0:02 14' 5" 4.4 Casing joint0:06 46' 5" 14.1 Static water level0:27 193' 0" 58.8 Fractured rock0:28 194' 0" 59.1 Wire in well0:28 196' 6" 59.9 Horizontal ring feature0:36 228' 6" 69.6 Open vug0:53 311' 0" 94.8 Object in well0:55 315' 6" 96.2 Bottom of well1:29 259' 1" 79.0 Horizontal ring feature1:54 211' 7" 64.5 Horizontal ring feature1:57 202' 7" 61.7 Horizontal ring feature1:59 199' 1" 60.7 Horizontal ring featureDVD 2 of 20:02 196' 2" 59.8 Horizontal ring feature0:16 177' 7" 54.1 Horizontal ring feature0:17 176' 10" 53.9 Horizontal ring feature0:31 155' 7" 47.4 Casing joint1:08 48' 2" 14.7 Static water level1:13 35' 2" 10.7 Casing joint1:18 14' 10" 4.5 Casing joint1:23 5' 11" 1.8 Pitless adapter1:25 1' 5" 0.4 Casing joint1:26 0' 0" 0.0 Top of casingVideo survey conducted by Jason DionNote: Measuring point (MP) is top of casingReference: 006-189 1 of 1 2011/02/14
Page 2 and 3:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 2 of
Page 4 and 5:
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 10 o
Page 12 and 13:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 12 o
Page 14 and 15:
Pressure (kPa)K18/K19 Well House to
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 4a - Existing ConditionsPump
Page 18 and 19:
Figure 6a - Existing System w/Combi
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 8a - Existing ConditionsWell
Page 22 and 23:
Figure 10a - Future System w/Combin
Page 24 and 25:
MD-80 CATALYTIC MEDIAIRON, MANGANES
Page 26 and 27:
NR - Pressure FiltersHorizontal and
Page 28 and 29:
Napier-Reid Ltd.Pressure FiltersSal
Page 30 and 31:
APPENDIX EHydrogeological Assessmen
Page 32 and 33:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63: HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
Page 70: HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
Page 78 and 79: 25Pumping Rate20Pumping Rate (L/s)1
Page 82 and 83: TABLE 2SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALY
Page 84 and 85: CALCULATION OF SPECIFIC CAPACITY FR
Page 111: March 2, 2011Reference: 006-189Stan
Page 134 and 135: July 23, 2010Lisa Lachuta, P.Eng.Pa
Page 140: TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A1 -STRANGE ST
Page 143 and 144: TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A1 -STRANGE ST
Page 145: TABLE 1SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALY
show all

Sam Ziemann From - Region of Waterloo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?