Sam Ziemann From - Region of Waterloo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE STREET WATER SUPPLY CLASS EA UPDATEREGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO5.0 ConclusionsBased on this update to the hydrogeologic assessment completed in the initial Class EA(Stantec, 2001), the following conclusions have been made:• The geologic conditions within the Strange Street Well Field and the Waterloo Moraine aresimilar to those previously described (Stantec, 2000), however, in light of recent detailedstudies (Bajc and Shirota, 2007; Stantec, 2009), updates to the hydrostratigraphicconceptual model have been made and presented within this report;• All of the current Production Wells (K10A, K11A, K13, K18, and K19) are interpreted to bescreened within Aquifer 1 (AFB2). This layer typically ranges in thickness from 0 to 40 m,with an average thickness of about 10 m, and is typically not present below an elevation of310 m AMSL. It is predominantly defined by fine and medium sand, silt, and gravel basedon continuous core logging data;• Groundwater within the supply aquifer is generally of good quality with the exception ofelevated chloride and sodium in some wells on the eastern end of the well field, andelevated iron and manganese as a result of the natural aquifer characteristics;• A recent evaluation of well performance was completed throughout the well field, and it wasnoted that Production Well K13 had experienced a significant decrease in performancecompared to the as-constructed well capabilities. Production Well K18 still performs near itsas-constructed capacity, and recent work completed on Production Wells K10A and K19have improved performance to within an acceptable level in comparison to as-constructeddetails. It is recommended that Production Well K15 be abandoned;• In order to secure the water supply from the Strange Street Well Field, additional test drillinglocations were proposed near K11A/K13, in the Westmount Golf and Country Club practicearea, and within Gzowski Park (Figure 1). Selection of each location was based on athorough review of the area geology and stratigraphy, water quality, ease of site access, andease of connection to the existing water supply system;• Test Well K-SS-TW1-11, was constructed at Gzowski Park. Construction of a test well atthe Westmount Golf and Country Club was not completed due to issues with site access;• Aquifer 1 (AFB1 and AFB2) was interpreted to be approximately 29 m thick based oncontinuous core samples collected at K-SS-OW1A-11. The middle Maryhill Till (ATB2) wasnot observed at K-SS-OW1A-11 despite being present at Monitoring Well K-SS13-99 whichis located about 250 m east of K-SS-OW1-11;• Aquifer 1 hydraulic parameters were estimated using the observed drawdown atK-SS-OW1B-11 and K-SS-OW1C-11 during the performance testing at K-SS-TW1-11. Ahls v:\01609\active\161110897_strange_st\planning\report\final hydrogeo assessment\final\fnl_rpt_120319.docx 5.1
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE STREET WATER SUPPLY CLASS EA UPDATEREGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOOConclusionsMarch 19, 2012transmissivity of 2,200 m 2 /day was estimated using the Theis (1935) solution for unconfinedaquifer systems.• Results of the 24-hour constant rate pumping test indicated that a larger diameter test wellconstructed adjacent to test well K-SS-TW1-11 may be capable of supplying water at ratesup to 60 L/s. The drawdown cone during the 24-hour constant rate pumping test was limitedto the immediate vicinity of the pumped well (
Page 2 and 3:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 2 of
Page 4 and 5:
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 10 o
Page 12 and 13:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 12 o
Page 14 and 15: Pressure (kPa)K18/K19 Well House to
Page 16 and 17: Figure 4a - Existing ConditionsPump
Page 18 and 19: Figure 6a - Existing System w/Combi
Page 20 and 21: Figure 8a - Existing ConditionsWell
Page 22 and 23: Figure 10a - Future System w/Combin
Page 24 and 25: MD-80 CATALYTIC MEDIAIRON, MANGANES
Page 26 and 27: NR - Pressure FiltersHorizontal and
Page 28 and 29: Napier-Reid Ltd.Pressure FiltersSal
Page 30 and 31: APPENDIX EHydrogeological Assessmen
Page 32 and 33: HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
Page 70: HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
Page 78 and 79: 25Pumping Rate20Pumping Rate (L/s)1
Page 82 and 83: TABLE 2SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALY
Page 84 and 85: CALCULATION OF SPECIFIC CAPACITY FR
Page 111 and 112: March 2, 2011Reference: 006-189Stan
Page 113 and 114: TABLE 1REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WAT
Page 132 and 133:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
Page 134 and 135:
July 23, 2010Lisa Lachuta, P.Eng.Pa
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140:
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A1 -STRANGE ST
Page 143 and 144:
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A1 -STRANGE ST
Page 145:
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALY
show all

Sam Ziemann From - Region of Waterloo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?