July 23, 2010Lisa Lachuta, P.Eng.Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 7Reference: Technical Memorandum A1 –Strange Street Well Field Water Quality Assessmentexceeding the ODWS Aesthetic Objective (AO) <strong>of</strong> 250 mg/L were observed at formerProduction Wells K12 and K17, as well as Production Well K10A. A similar upwardtrend was noted in the concentration <strong>of</strong> sodium at each <strong>of</strong> the production wells,suggesting that winter road salt activities is the likely source <strong>of</strong> the impacts. Bothhistoric (Stantec, 2000) and current (May 2010) water quality analysis at monitoringwells throughout the well field found elevated chloride and sodium in select wells. Inparticular, monitoring wells OW1-82, SS13-99 and SS08-99 indicated concentrationsthat are approaching or exceeding the ODWS. All the residential wells sampled (RW1,RW2 and RW3) exhibited elevated sodium and chloride concentrations.The monitoring and production wells on the western edge <strong>of</strong> the well field typically havelower concentrations <strong>of</strong> chloride and sodium than those wells further east. In particular,wells east <strong>of</strong> Westmount Road exhibit elevated sodium and chloride. The exceptions tothis were SS08-99, RW1, RW2 and RW3, where chloride and sodium were observed tobe elevated during the May 2010 sampling, and OW4B-46, in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> K11A andK13, where the ODWS was exceeded for both sodium and chloride during the 1999sampling event (Stantec, 2000).IRONIron concentrations found within production wells have varied historically, but aretypically below the ODWS AO <strong>of</strong> 0.3 mg/L (Figure 2). Iron levels within raw waterobtained from Production Well K10/K10A have been the most variable, with occasionalspikes in the data resulting in exceedances <strong>of</strong> the ODWS. Water quality resultsobtained from monitoring wells in the 2010 sampling event found elevated ironconcentrations in all wells (8.92 mg/L to 0.035 mg/L), as indicated on Figure 1. Duringthe 1999 sampling event (Stantec, 2000), the ODWS was exceeded in monitoring wellsnear all the currently active production wells. Elevated iron is naturally found ingroundwater extracted from this aquifer, and is not the result <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic activity.The <strong>Region</strong> is currently planning for the installation <strong>of</strong> a water treatment plant to treatthe elevated iron found in the water obtained from the Strange Street Well Fieldproduction wells.MANGANESEWithin the Strange Street production wells, manganese has historically been near orabove the ODWS AO <strong>of</strong> 0.05 mg/L (Figure 2). A slight increasing trend was noted forall production wells, with Production Wells K10/K10A and K11 typically having thehighest levels <strong>of</strong> manganese. Production Well K12 also exhibited elevated levels <strong>of</strong>manganese while in operation, typically above 0.4 mg/L.Within monitoring wells sampled as part <strong>of</strong> the 2010 monitoring program, elevatedmanganese was observed to be above the ODWS AO in all monitoring wells east <strong>of</strong>Production Wells K18/K19. This is consistent with the 1999 water quality results, whichfound elevated manganese in many <strong>of</strong> the wells that were sampled throughout the wellfield. Elevated manganese is naturally found in groundwater extracted from this supplyaquifer, and is not the result <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic activity. The <strong>Region</strong> is currently planningfor the installation <strong>of</strong> a water treatment plant to treat the elevated manganese found inthe water obtained from the Strange Street Well Field production wells.
July 23, 2010Lisa Lachuta, P.Eng.Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 7Reference: Technical Memorandum A1 –Strange Street Well Field Water Quality AssessmentSULPHATEWithin the Strange Street production wells, sulphate has historically been well below theODWS AO <strong>of</strong> 500 mg/L (Figure 2), with all production wells except K17 consistentlymeasuring below 250 mg/L.Within monitoring wells sampled as part <strong>of</strong> the 2010 monitoring program, sulphateconcentrations in the aquifer did not exceed 100 mg/L, with the exception <strong>of</strong> SS13-99,where sulphate was measured at 177 mg/L. This is consistent with the 1999 monitoringevent, where sulphate was not observed to be above the ODWS AO in any <strong>of</strong> themonitoring wells (Stantec, 2000).NITRATEConcentrations for nitrate in the production wells have remained well below the ODWSMaximum Acceptable Concentration (MAC) <strong>of</strong> 10 mg/L (Figure 23), with the exception<strong>of</strong> one occurrence at Production Well K11 in June <strong>of</strong> 1987 where nitrate concentrationsreached 9.25 mg/L. Since 2000, levels for nitrate at all active Production Wells haveremained below 1 mg/L. This is consistent with findings during the 1999 and 2010monitoring well sampling programs, where nitrate was consistently either not detectedor was found to be well below the ODWS MAC <strong>of</strong> 10 mg/L.ORGANIC PARAMETERSNo VOCs were detected in any <strong>of</strong> the water quality samples collected during the 2010sampling event. Upon examining the 1999 water quality data for the select monitoringwells, the following detections for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were noted forwells screened within the municipal supply aquifer:• At OW4B-46, near K11A and K13, detections were observed for benzene,ethylbenzene, toluene, m- & p-Xylene and σ-Xylene;• At SS08-99, north <strong>of</strong> the Westmount Golf and Country Club, benzene and toluenewere detected;• At SS09-99, west <strong>of</strong> the Strange Street Well Field, benzene, toluene and m- & p-Xylene were detected in the groundwater sample; and• At SS11-99, south <strong>of</strong> K18 and K19, acetone, benzene, toluene and m- & p-Xylenewere detected in the groundwater sample.Upon reviewing historical organic water quality data for the production wells, thefollowing parameters were observed on more than one occasion in the indicatedproduction well:• 1,4 dioxane was detected twice between 2004 and 2007 in Production Well K10;• Tetrachloroethylene was detected twice in 2004 and 2005 at Production Well K10and seven (7) times at Production Well K12 between 1992 and 1999;
- Page 2 and 3:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 2 of
- Page 4 and 5:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 4 of
- Page 6 and 7:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 6 of
- Page 8 and 9:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 8 of
- Page 10 and 11:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 10 o
- Page 12 and 13:
August 26, 2011Sam ZiemannPage 12 o
- Page 14 and 15:
Pressure (kPa)K18/K19 Well House to
- Page 16 and 17:
Figure 4a - Existing ConditionsPump
- Page 18 and 19:
Figure 6a - Existing System w/Combi
- Page 20 and 21:
Figure 8a - Existing ConditionsWell
- Page 22 and 23:
Figure 10a - Future System w/Combin
- Page 24 and 25:
MD-80 CATALYTIC MEDIAIRON, MANGANES
- Page 26 and 27:
NR - Pressure FiltersHorizontal and
- Page 28 and 29:
Napier-Reid Ltd.Pressure FiltersSal
- Page 30 and 31:
APPENDIX EHydrogeological Assessmen
- Page 32 and 33:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 34 and 35:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 36 and 37:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 38 and 39:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 40 and 41:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 42 and 43:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 44 and 45:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 46 and 47:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 48 and 49:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 50 and 51:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 52 and 53:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 54 and 55:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 56 and 57:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 58 and 59:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 60 and 61:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 62 and 63:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 64 and 65:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 66 and 67:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 68 and 69:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 70:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 78 and 79:
25Pumping Rate20Pumping Rate (L/s)1
- Page 80 and 81:
HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 82 and 83:
TABLE 2SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALY
- Page 84 and 85:
CALCULATION OF SPECIFIC CAPACITY FR
- Page 111 and 112: March 2, 2011Reference: 006-189Stan
- Page 113 and 114: TABLE 1REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WAT
- Page 132 and 133: HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTSTRANGE S
- Page 134 and 135: July 23, 2010Lisa Lachuta, P.Eng.Pa
- Page 138 and 139: July 23, 2010Lisa Lachuta, P.Eng.Pa
- Page 140: TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A1 -STRANGE ST
- Page 143 and 144: TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM A1 -STRANGE ST
- Page 145: TABLE 1SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALY