- Page 1 and 2: Access to substance abuse treatment
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSINTRODUCTION ..............
- Page 5 and 6: 5.4. SUMMARY.......................
- Page 7 and 8: al., 2004; Reddy et al., 2003; Shis
- Page 9 and 10: 1.3. IS ACCESS TO SUBSTANCE ABUSE T
- Page 11 and 12: 1.4.2. Racial disparities in the ne
- Page 13 and 14: illegally and are unregulated by th
- Page 15 and 16: CONCEPTUAL MODELThis study’s conc
- Page 17 and 18: presenting problems and ability to
- Page 19 and 20: need for services is the most immed
- Page 21 and 22: This study focuses specifically on
- Page 23 and 24: METHOD3.1. STUDY AIMS & OBJECTIVESA
- Page 25 and 26: the researcher to explore possible
- Page 27 and 28: esidential areas from each of the s
- Page 29 and 30: 3.3.2.4. Data collection: controlsF
- Page 31 and 32: o Problem recognition, Desire for h
- Page 33 and 34: Table 1.Domains and measures compri
- Page 35 and 36: The 19-item MOS-SSS measures functi
- Page 37 and 38: information on the accessibility of
- Page 39 and 40: RESULTS: PHASE ONE4.1. VARIABLES AS
- Page 41 and 42: efficacy to stop using drugs for mo
- Page 43: (Table 6). Effect sizes were large
- Page 47 and 48: esteem scales (Table 9). Stigma als
- Page 49 and 50: Table 10.Logistic regression coeffi
- Page 51 and 52: 4.2.2. Model 2: Predisposing variab
- Page 53 and 54: poverty scale, and the variable “
- Page 55 and 56: of the model increased significantl
- Page 57 and 58: controls had greater self-efficacy
- Page 59 and 60: and R1000 per month than their fema
- Page 61 and 62: subjects earning less than R500 per
- Page 63 and 64: and race (Table 16). This indicates
- Page 65 and 66: were 3 times more likely to earn le
- Page 67 and 68: (which are higher for Black/African
- Page 69 and 70: substance use or remain abstinent d
- Page 71 and 72: monetary needs rise, subjects repor
- Page 73 and 74: with improved awareness of services
- Page 75 and 76: 4.4.4.4. Predictors of “community
- Page 77 and 78: • In historically disadvantaged c
- Page 79 and 80: RESULTS: PHASE TWODuring qualitativ
- Page 81 and 82: 5.1.1.3. Government’s responses t
- Page 83 and 84: “Part of the government's agenda
- Page 85 and 86: putting extra strain and pressure o
- Page 87 and 88: The impact of availability and affo
- Page 89 and 90: availability of affordable services
- Page 91 and 92: completed a hospital-based detoxifi
- Page 93 and 94: “I have thirty beds that are unus
- Page 95 and 96:
“I don't see it amongst the bona
- Page 97 and 98:
going to be a good day. So, yes it
- Page 99 and 100:
in the fourth week they relapse, it
- Page 101 and 102:
esponses to treatment, in part, are
- Page 103 and 104:
• Awareness of appropriate treatm
- Page 105 and 106:
This perception is prevalent in Col
- Page 107 and 108:
substance abuse problem - without a
- Page 109 and 110:
o These community influences are lo
- Page 111 and 112:
6.2.1. Awareness of substance abuse
- Page 113 and 114:
informational support can improve a
- Page 115 and 116:
salient for low-income groups who h
- Page 117 and 118:
diminishing self-efficacy and motiv
- Page 119 and 120:
self-efficacy and negative percepti
- Page 121 and 122:
6.3. TREATMENT SYSTEM FACTORS ASSOC
- Page 123 and 124:
This study found that limited resou
- Page 125 and 126:
6.4. RECOMMENDATIONSBased on study
- Page 127 and 128:
• As findings suggest that female
- Page 129 and 130:
• While the affordability of trea
- Page 131 and 132:
To address these barriers, we argue
- Page 133 and 134:
o To ensure objectivity, this needs
- Page 135 and 136:
egistration process should gather i
- Page 137 and 138:
REFERENCESAday, L.A., & Awe, W.C. (
- Page 139 and 140:
First, MB; Spitzer, RL; Gibbon, M;
- Page 141 and 142:
Myers, B., & Parry, C.D.H. (2005).
- Page 143 and 144:
Ross, M.W., Williams, M.L., Timpson