Danube Rivers Morphology and Revitalization - DANUBEPARKS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• restoration of wetlands and management plans for protected sites;• support to the local people in adopting environmentally friendly economicactivities.The long term objective of the Project is the adoption of practices forsustainable management of the natural resources by the local communities andauthorities on the territory of Persina Nature Park and Kalimok/Brushlen ProtectedSite. The project demonstrates how the environmentally friendly activities for thedevelopment of an agricultural area can improve the local economy and business.Persina Nature Park (PNP) and Kalimok/Brushlen Protected Site (KBPS) wereselected as project sites due to the high value of their biodiversity, the wetlandcapacity to extract biogenic pollutants and their role for flood prevention. Besidesboth of the territories are part of the initiative “The Danube River Downstream - aGreen Corridor”, which started in June 2000, with the objective to structure a networkof completely functioning wetlands along the Danube River in Romania, Bulgaria,Moldova and Ukraine.Project implementation:This project is implemented in the framework of the Strategic Partnership forNutrient Reduction Strategy for the Danube and Black Sea Basins The objective ofthe strategic partnership is to assist the countries to invest in ensuring control orreduction of nutrient flux into the Black Sea water.The scope of works:The scope of works comprises carrying out a feasibility study and detailedtechnical designs, inclusive of cost estimates, for the necessary infrastructureimprovements required for the proposed wetland restoration scenario. This includedpiled inlet/outlet sluice structures, rehabilitation of existing dikes and channels andnew drainage canals.> Conduct additional necessary surveys> Carry out a technical feasibility of the proposed restoration alternatives38
Elaborate detailed technical engineering design for the necessary infrastructureimprovements, including new canals, structures and rehabilitation of existingfacilities, to ensure restoration and sustainable management of wetlands under thecurrent hydrological regime in the Danube river.> Carry out detailed cost estimates for all infrastructure construction andimprovement.> Prepare bid documents required for tendering as per World Bank standarddocuments for the construction of the required infrastructure components> Develop an operational and maintenance manual to operate and maintain thefacilities in a sustainable mannerThe final design solution for each site needed to ensure that the restorationand sustainable management of the wetlands could be met under the currenthydrological regime in the Danube River. These improvements should aim tomaximise the water flow through the system in order to optimize nutrient trapping,bio-diversity restoration, maximise fish production and create opportunities forfisheries development, and minimise sedimentation.Results of the project:The most important and innovative activity of the project is the physicalrestoration of the wetlands in the two protected areas. In the course of theimplementation of this component activities the project has restored 4 035 ha offormer wetlands on two specific sites – Belene Island (2 280 ha) within the PersinaNature Park and Kalimok/Brushlen (1 755 ha) within the Kalimok/Brushlen ProtectedSite – in order to demonstrate the use of riparian wetlands as nutrient traps.In order to achieve efficient restoration of the wetlands it is necessary toenable the Danube River water flow into the previous marsh territories. To provide forthis some engineering facilities are built, including sluices, channels, dykes to protectthe adjacent land, as well as access roads. Thus an option for controlled flooding,optimized trapping of nutrient elements, and restoration of biodiversity and fishpopulations, living in these water basins will be ensured. All that will allow forsustainability of the wetlands ecosystems.39
Page 1 and 2: MINISTERUL MEDIULUI SI PADURILORINS
Page 3 and 4: WORK TEAM‣ DANUBE DELTA NATIONAL
Page 5 and 6: Phase 1 - Preparation of the Danube
Page 7 and 8: The river restoration projects prec
Page 9 and 10: the Upper Danube and > 30 km in the
Page 11 and 12: navigation. Hence, the creation and
Page 13 and 14: Non-native and Invasive speciesFor
Page 15 and 16: members of the public, and cooperat
Page 17 and 18: activities. This principle is actua
Page 19 and 20: 2007. The exercise should be finali
Page 21 and 22: from 30 ha to 600.000 ha, have been
Page 23 and 24: Challenges and recommendations for
Page 25 and 26: Bureaucracy, corruption, and politi
Page 27 and 28: MATERIALS AND METHODS WITHIN PHASE
Page 29 and 30: addresses the longitudinal linkages
Page 31 and 32: create an adequate territorial plan
Page 33 and 34: Activity 1.2. A public debate about
Page 35 and 36: Aims of the project:• Bring back
Page 37: • strengthening capacity to prote
Page 41 and 42: Project name:3. Extension of the ex
Page 43 and 44: Whole the area of Belene Island com
Page 45 and 46: improve what was left of the rich n
Page 47 and 48: sections about 35 ha of new gravel
Page 49 and 50: fish, the hard construction caused
Page 51 and 52: Results of the project:At the end o
Page 53 and 54: The higher reaches of the slopes wh
Page 55 and 56: The new channel, which rejoins the
Page 57 and 58: Project name:10. National Park Dona
Page 59 and 60: Project name:12. LIFE05NAT/SK/00011
Page 61 and 62: presentation of the project in medi
Page 63 and 64: Project name:13. Krapje Djol (Croat
Page 65 and 66: Project name:15. Ecological Restora
Page 67 and 68: • the periodical alternation of f
Page 69 and 70: Another important finding was that
Page 71 and 72: een destroyed. Since the political
Page 73 and 74: It is an intensive process that org
Page 75 and 76: Such tools are:• "time line chart
Page 77 and 78: 1.1.2. Classification of Danube Riv
Page 79 and 80: CONCLUSIONSAlong the Danube River,
Page 81 and 82: BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Binder W., (2008), R
Page 83 and 84: MINISTERUL MEDIULUI SI PADURILORINS
Page 85 and 86: WORK TEAM DANUBE DELTA NATIONAL INS
Page 87 and 88: Phase 2 - Comprehensive Danube Rive
Page 89 and 90:
This first activity consists in the
Page 91 and 92:
The river grows and the gradient le
Page 93 and 94:
The importance of the connectivityC
Page 95 and 96:
Does the design invite invasive spe
Page 97 and 98:
3. Self sustainingThe ecosystem is
Page 99 and 100:
Table 2- List of revitalisation pro
Page 102 and 103:
2.3.2. Background information (Babi
Page 104 and 105:
Catchment3 area size:4 Geology1 sma
Page 106 and 107:
456to improve longitudinalconnectiv
Page 108 and 109:
The second project that was success
Page 110 and 111:
2.3.5. Cernovca background Informat
Page 112 and 113:
2.3.7. Ecological reconstruction im
Page 114 and 115:
For the areas, the reestablishment
Page 116 and 117:
Once a general agreement on reasona
Page 118 and 119:
BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Benke, A. C. (2001),
Page 120 and 121:
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI SI PADURILORINS
Page 122 and 123:
WORK TEAM‣ DANUBE DELTA NATIONAL
Page 124 and 125:
III.2.2. Ecoregions and surface wat
Page 126 and 127:
The geometric features of the river
Page 128 and 129:
Revitalization as defined in Los An
Page 130 and 131:
Danube Basin region is a functional
Page 132 and 133:
egimes. However, the Iron Curtain a
Page 134 and 135:
The main issuesEnvironment in the D
Page 136 and 137:
states that joined at different tim
Page 138 and 139:
The role and contribution of Romani
Page 140 and 141:
Types of eligible expenditure- Gene
Page 142 and 143:
I.4 Conceptual Framework and its re
Page 144 and 145:
Is the river able to connect with i
Page 146 and 147:
certain locations on the same strea
Page 148 and 149:
limited pool of potential colonizer
Page 150 and 151:
Creating oportunities and valuesIn
Page 152 and 153:
Figure 4 - General model of ecosyst
Page 154 and 155:
The coherent understanding and the
Page 156 and 157:
Starting form the Corine Land Cover
Page 158 and 159:
investments that are introduced to
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 8 - Adding another category
Page 162 and 163:
Reserves (m3)Indicators of availabi
Page 164 and 165:
EconomicEconomic performanceEconomi
Page 166 and 167:
and compared to other MCA methods (
Page 168 and 169:
ii. Tourism attractiveness - of the
Page 170 and 171:
• Incorporate risk analysis into
Page 172 and 173:
the River in Cat’s Bend, Romania,
Page 174 and 175:
Also, all the difficulties and succ
Page 176 and 177:
wetlands that are natural habitats
Page 178 and 179:
Thus, in the given circumstances, t
Page 180 and 181:
The desire to understand the crisis
Page 182 and 183:
Environment Agency - CLC200, on lan
Page 184 and 185:
‣ Monitoring results of revitaliz
Page 186 and 187:
‣ Morava River (Slovakia and Aust
Page 188 and 189:
(i) The surface water bodies within
Page 190 and 191:
System BAlternative characterisatio
Page 192 and 193:
System BAlternativecharacterisation
Page 194 and 195:
water type. In such circumstances M
Page 196 and 197:
arriers limit the natural recovery
Page 198 and 199:
III.4.2 Metoda SketchMatch (SM)An i
Page 200 and 201:
c) The Focus groups structures (hom
Page 202 and 203:
4 Sidearm restoration project Schö
Page 204 and 205:
The ecosystem is self-sustaining. I
Page 206 and 207:
Assessemnt CriteriaProject Identifi
Page 208 and 209:
V. GUIDE OF MANAGEMENT MEASURESIn t
Page 210 and 211:
g) identification of tendency of st
Page 212 and 213:
VI RELATION BETWEEN THE DANUBE PARK
Page 214 and 215:
VI.2 The concept of Integrated Regi
Page 216 and 217:
principles of nature conservation,
Page 218 and 219:
EECONET emphasizes the importance o
Page 220 and 221:
Criteria for selection of core area
Page 222 and 223:
D. Selection of the natural areas s
Page 224:
10. Thom, R.M., Diefenderfer H.L.
show all

Danube Rivers Morphology and Revitalization - DANUBEPARKS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?