ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.90as known, in all the members of the Flagellata, the coalescing units arefrequently of diverse size and contour, the one larger and more rounded, andthe other smaller and more attenuate. The inference to be derived from thiscircumstance, combined with the fact that in the conjugative process thesmaller unit mostly,if not invariably, becomes absorbed by or immersedwithin the substance of the larger, is unavoidable. The larger unit takes theplace of the female element, and initself figuratively and physiologicallyrepresents the monocellular unimpregnated ovum ;the smaller one to anidentical with the male element or spermatozoon, andequivalent degree isthrough itsunion with the female one communicates to the latter that revivifyinginfluence expressed through a capacity to prolong the reproductivefunction, and whether that function takes the form of binary division, gemmation,or spore-production, the dioecious generative type may certainlybe said to be represented in its most elementary condition. With thoseanimalcules, on the other hand, such as Paramecium and Bursaria, in whichconjugation is simply transient and incomplete, and where both conjugativefactors meet and part on equal terms, both the male and female elements,if such are represented, are necessarily united in each individual zooid, andthe generative systemis as distinctly and essentially hermaphrodite ormonoecious.Affinities of the Infusoria to the Higher Zoological Groups.Among the very extensive, and in some respects heterogeneous, assemblagesof animal forms associated in this volume under the comprehensivetitle of the Infusoria there is necessarily encountered a series of races ortypes that not only differ very widely from one another, but which occupy,so far as it is possible to predicate, a very different rank or position withrelation to the outlying representatives of the organic series. Being accepted,as already explained, as simple unicellular organisms or Protozoa,no comparisons possessing a homologic value can necessarily be institutedbetween the Infusoria and any members of the more highly organized andmulticellular Metazoa. It remains, however, to be shown that, while nosuch direct homological comparisons can be established, there permeatesthroughout the ranks of this extensive group a substratum of superficialor homoplastic resemblances whose existence it is impossible to ignore.Regarded from this point of view, the Infusoria will be found, like an architect'spuny and homogeneous clay or plaster model, to, as it were, anticipateand pre-typify the elaborate edifice of multiple and diverse materialsafterwards erected or eliminated from this same" primary simple plan.In yet another direction it is likewise capable of demonstration thata very considerable number of infusorial animalcules foreshadow or typifyin a corresponding manner, in either their isolated or socially aggregatedcondition, the separate or associated cellular elements out of which thehigher tissue-structures or Metazoic organisms are built up. The likenessin this last instance is necessarily far more substantial than in theH 2
100 ORGANIZATION OF THE INFUSORIA.preceding case, and, as the comparisons instituted are as between celland cell or equivalent appendages of such cells, all likenesses of thisdescription may in the strictest parlance be termed homologous resemblances.Some of the more prominent examples that fall within thislast-named category may be first enumerated. Commencingwith theInfusorial group, in its simplest or most lowly organized condition, or in thefirst place descending yet a step lower, and selecting a simple RhizopodousProtozoon, such as an Amoeba, it is impossible not to recognize that we havehere the morphological equivalent or homologue of a tissue-cell in its mostelementary condition, as represented by a colourless blood-, lymph-, organglionic-corpuscle. The likeness in this instance is, furthermore, notsimply one of form in the case of the blood- and;lymph-corpuscles, reptantmovements accomplished by the extension and contraction of pseudopodicappendages, and similar to those of the independent Rhizopod, are alsofreely manifested. It is from such a similar simple repent amcebiform bodythat many of the flagelliferous members of the Infusorial class take theirorigin, as demonstrated by the author in the case of Euglena, Eutreptia, andmany Choano-Flagellata, while the retrogression to such a simple elementaltype is a familiar phenomenon among the representativesimmediately antecedent to the process of either encystmentof this same sectionor coalescence.Proceeding with an examination of the flagelliferous section of the Infusoriain itsnormal conditions of development, we find at the bottom of the seriesthe curious genus Trypanosoma distinguished in the case of T. EbertJd bya long attenuate body, around which is spirally disposed a most delicatefrill-like membrane, whose active vibrations fulfil the function of locomotion.It is a remarkable fact that an essentially similar type of structure characterizesthe exceptionally shaped monocellular spermatozoons of Triton,Bombinator, and other tailed and tailless Amphibia, as originally figuredby Wagner and Leuckart, Unker, and Von Siebold. Spermatozoa in theirnormal and most familiar form consist merely of a more or less roundedanterior extremity or head, and a dependent flagelliform appendage or tail,and have been recently compared by Professor Huxley * to a simple cellof which the larger and more solid anterior part represents the nucleus,and the dependent tail only the very fully developed and much attenuatedperipheral protoplasm. This more normal and simple form of the spermatozoalelement isabundantly represented in the class now under consideration.Such simple uniflagellate types as Monas and Petalomonasexhibit in their adult state of development a type of structure essentiallycorresponding with that of an ordinary spermatozoon, while the Heteromita,the majority of the Choano-Flagellata, and numerous EustomatousFlagellata commence their existence as simple uniflagellate spermatozoonlikeorganisms. In the case of Heteromita lens, as also in that of theswarm-gemmules of the flagelliferous Spongozoa, it is, moreover, noteworthythat in their initial condition of free-swimming existence the individual* Biological Lectures, South Kensington, Session 1879-80.
- Page 3:
aoamoa
- Page 6 and 7:
"Our little systems have their day,
- Page 9:
TOTHOMAS HENRY HUXLEY, LL.D.,F.R.S.
- Page 12 and 13:
viiiPREFACE.experience some disappo
- Page 14 and 15:
XPREFACE.ready and valuable assista
- Page 16 and 17:
LEEUWENHOEtfS OBSERVATIONS. 3relate
- Page 18 and 19:
LEEUWENHOEICS OBSERVATIONS.5spatter
- Page 20 and 21:
LEEUWENHOEK'S OBSERVATIONS.Jstopped
- Page 22 and 23:
SIfi E. KING, 1693. JOHN HARRIS, 16
- Page 24 and 25:
STEPHEN GRA Y, 1696. LEEUWENHOEK, 1
- Page 26 and 27:
HENRY BAKER, 1742, 1753.13"Oct. 6th
- Page 28 and 29:
O. F. MULLER, 1773-1786. 15ledge of
- Page 30 and 31:
EHRENBERG, 1836. 17Notwithstanding
- Page 32 and 33:
F. DUJARDIN, 1841. T. VON SIEBOLD,
- Page 34 and 35:
FRIEDRICH STEIN, 1849-1854. 21cules
- Page 36 and 37:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANN, 1858-1860.
- Page 38 and 39:
F. STEIN, 1859. R. M. DIES ING, 184
- Page 40 and 41:
ANDREW PRITCHARD, 1861. H. JAMES-CL
- Page 42 and 43:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE, 1873-1875.
- Page 44 and 45:
CHAPTER II.THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA
- Page 46 and 47:
AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGIDA. 33ordin
- Page 48 and 49:
PRIMARY SUBDIVISIONS A UTHOKS S YST
- Page 50 and 51:
AUTHORS PHYLOGENETIC SCHEME. 37DIAG
- Page 52 and 53:
FLA CELLA TA -PANTOS TOMA TA ; FLA
- Page 54 and 55:
CHOANO-FLAGELLATA; MYCETOZOA. 41acc
- Page 56 and 57:
MYCETOZOAj LABYRINTHULIDA. 43From t
- Page 58 and 59:
GROUPS PROTISTA AND MONERA. 45of th
- Page 60 and 61:
DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND PR
- Page 62 and 63: ( 49 )CHAPTER III.NATURE AND ORGANI
- Page 64 and 65: AUTHORS CLASSIFICATORY TABLE.TABULA
- Page 66 and 67: UNICELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 3dissolutio
- Page 68 and 69: UN1CELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 5of the ent
- Page 70 and 71: CUTICULAR ELEMENTS. 57substance the
- Page 72 and 73: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 59by the interca
- Page 74 and 75: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 6 1transparent,
- Page 76 and 77: ENCYSTMENT. 63corresponding type of
- Page 78 and 79: LOCOMOTIVE AND PREHENSILE APPENDAGE
- Page 80 and 81: ORAL APERTURE. 67Oral Aperture or C
- Page 82 and 83: CONTRACTILE VESICLES. 69shadowed. A
- Page 84 and 85: CONTRACTILE VESICLES.71in the major
- Page 86 and 87: NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 73to indicate
- Page 88 and 89: NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 75Spirostomit
- Page 90 and 91: NUCLEOLUS OR ENDOPLASTULE. 77with t
- Page 92 and 93: COLOURING SUBSTANCES. 79held to ind
- Page 94 and 95: TRICHOCYSTS. 8 1crowded together an
- Page 96 and 97: TRICHOCYSTS. 83follow it,and being
- Page 98 and 99: BINARY DIVISION. 85that remain, red
- Page 100 and 101: EXTERNAL GEMMATION. 87entire oblite
- Page 102 and 103: SPORULAR MULTIPLICATION. 89four, ei
- Page 104 and 105: GENE TIC REPROD UCTION. 9 1and the
- Page 106 and 107: GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 93illustrated
- Page 108 and 109: GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 95capsules we
- Page 110 and 111: GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 97be essentia
- Page 114 and 115: ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.IOIunicellula
- Page 116 and 117: ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 103position.
- Page 118 and 119: ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 105forming t
- Page 120 and 121: DIS TRIE UTION. \ O 7plete covering
- Page 122 and 123: DISTRIBUTION.IOQIn an enumeration o
- Page 124 and 125: DISTRIBUTION. I Ihunting grounds. A
- Page 126 and 127: PRESER VA TION. I 13Preservation of
- Page 128 and 129: ME THODS OF INVES TIGA TION. I I5fo
- Page 130 and 131: METHODS OF INVESTIGA TION.1 1^only
- Page 132 and 133: RED I; TUBERVILLE NEEDHAM. 119simil
- Page 134 and 135: JOHN HARRIS ; SPALLANZANI.l 2 rfor
- Page 136 and 137: LORENZ OKEN; EHRENBERG. 123moment w
- Page 138 and 139: POUCHET ; PASTEUR. 125Director of t
- Page 140 and 141: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 127now to be sup
- Page 142 and 143: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. I29needle-dip fr
- Page 144 and 145: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 131tubes, as giv
- Page 146 and 147: DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE. 133four day
- Page 148 and 149: A UTHOKS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 5and D
- Page 150 and 151: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 7or le
- Page 152 and 153: AUTHOR'S INVESTIGATIONS. 139and lai
- Page 154 and 155: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 1 4 1clos
- Page 156 and 157: ( 143 )CHAPTER V.NATURE AND AFFINIT
- Page 158 and 159: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 160 and 161: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 162 and 163:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 164 and 165:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 166 and 167:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 168 and 169:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 170 and 171:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 172 and 173:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 174 and 175:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 176 and 177:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 178 and 179:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 180 and 181:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 182 and 183:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 184 and 185:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 186 and 187:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 188 and 189:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 190 and 191:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 192 and 193:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 194 and 195:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 196 and 197:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 198 and 199:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 200 and 201:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 202 and 203:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 204 and 205:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 206 and 207:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 208 and 209:
( 195 )CHAPTER VI.SYSTEMS OF CLASSI
- Page 210 and 211:
CLASSIFICATION OF THE INFUSORIA.197
- Page 212 and 213:
MULLERS CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 214 and 215:
EHRENBERG'S CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM.2
- Page 216 and 217:
CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS OF SIEBOLD A
- Page 218 and 219:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANWS CLASSIFICAT
- Page 220 and 221:
DIESINGS CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM. 207
- Page 222 and 223:
S TEIN'S CLA SSIFICA TOR Y S Ki TEM
- Page 224 and 225:
A UTHOKS CLASSIFICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 226 and 227:
A UTHOR'S CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM
- Page 228 and 229:
A UTHOKS CLASSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 230 and 231:
CLASS FLAGELLA TA. 2 I7more extensi
- Page 232 and 233:
GENUS TRYPANOSOMA. 219Trypanosoma s
- Page 234 and 235:
GENUS MASTIGAMCEBA . 221The some ha
- Page 236 and 237:
;,HAB.GENUS REPTOMONAS. 22$immediat
- Page 238 and 239:
ORDER RA DIO-FLA CELLA TA.225Podost
- Page 240 and 241:
Body subspherical orGENUS ACTINOMON
- Page 242 and 243:
GENUS SPONGASTERISCUS. 229Spongocyc
- Page 244 and 245:
Cladomonas.ipidodendrtSpongomonas.D