O. F. MULLER, 1773-1786. 15ledge of the larger forms of animalcules, chiefly Vorticellidae and Stentoridae,preceding the appearance of what to the present day holds rank as theearliest standard work that embodies a complete and systematic account ofthe members of the infusorial world. Reference is here made to the'Animalcula Infusoria' of Otho Friedrich Miiller, a posthumous quartovolume published in the year 1786, containing no less than fifty plates and367 pages of letterpress devoted to the description and illustration of closeupon three hundred species, fluviatile and marine, investigated and drawnfrom the life by this indefatigable worker during a period extending overno less than twenty years.This early pioneer in the then terra incognita of the Protozoicsub-kingdom had already in his 'Vermium terrestrium et fluviatilium'succincta Historia,' Zoologica Danicae Prodromus,' and 'Zool. Dan. Icones,'published respectively in the years 1773, 1776, and 1779, given descriptionsand illustrations of a large number of these numerous types, to all of whichhe attached distinctive generic and specific titles in conformity with Linnaeus'then newly-introduced binomial system of nomenclature each of these;compilations, however, possess but minor value compared with the workfirst quoted. To this latter, one is justified, indeed, in conceding as importanta status, as compared with all preceding literature upon the subject, as is subsequentlycommanded by C. G. Ehrenberg's classic volume, 'Die Infusionsthierchen,'published a little over half a century later. As might be anticipated,O. F. Muller embraces in his 'Animalcula Infusoria' numerous minuteorganisms that find no place in the infusorial group as at present constituted,although in this respect he trespasses but slightly from the path subsequentlypursued by Ehrenberg. In all, Muller institutes seventeen genericdenominations, the whole of which are still in use, and only one, his genusCercaria, being founded upon forms not admitted into Ehrenberg's systemof classification, while another, his genus Vibrio, embraces in addition tomany common forms of Bacteria, Vibrio, and Spirillum, as now recognized,various examples of the microscopic hair-worms or Anguillulce. The severalspecies of Stentor were now recognized as members of the same infusorialseries, and transferred to his somewhat comprehensive genus, Vorticella. Asa necessary consequence of the very imperfect instruments available forinvestigation at this early date, little more than a rough general outline ofthe species examined, and no details of their internal organization, areusually recorded, while in many of the types figured the cilia are but representedin part, or even altogether omitted. A reproduction of O. F. Muller'sgeneric subdivisions and earliest proposed scheme of classification of theInfusoria will be found in the chapter hereafter devoted to this specialsubject.In the long interval intervening between the 'publication of Muller's AnimalculaInfusoria 'and the appearance of Ehrenberg's world-famed treatise,a considerable number of investigators occupied themselves in the study ofthese minute organisms, but without achieving any very notable results.
1 6 niBLIOGRAPHY.Bonnet, Goezc, Gleichcn,Eichorn, Spallanzani, and Schranck, towards thetermination of the eighteenth, and Treviranus, Oken, Dutrochet, Nitzsch,and Bory de St. Vincent, during the commencement of the present century,are among the more conspicuous of these. Gleichen's name, perhaps,deserves special notice, he being the first to demonstrate, through the admixtureof finely comminuted carmine with the water, the capacity of Infusoriato appropriate this and other solid substances as food. Spallanzani detectedwithin the body-plasma of various species the bubble-like pulsating space orspaces afterwards denominated contractile vesicles, while the presence of aninternal, more solid, gland-like structure, the nucleus or endoplast, and theor transverse subdivision werecapacity of many to increase by longitudinalfamiliar to the majority of these observers. Examplesof these last-namedphenomena were, indeed, figured and described by Miiller, and had, as alreadyintimated, been observed long previously by Trembley in association with theStentors or trumpet-animalcules. Dutrochet, in the year 1812, achieved aprogressive step by the recognitionof the essential distinction of all thespecies referred by O. F. Miiller to the genus Brachionus ; these wereshown to exhibit a much higher organization than the ordinary Infusoria,possessing well-developed internal organs, and a much more complex typeof external contour, and were now distinguished for the first time by thetitle of Rotiferae or wheel-animalcules. This distinction, pointed out byDutrochet, was recognized by Lamarck and Cuvier in their respectiveclassifications of the animal kingdom, the Infusoria as embodied in Cuvicr'sscheme including all of Miiller's types, subdivided into two leading orders,the one including the more complex Rotiferae, and the other the apparentlystructureless and homogeneous animalcules. These latter were,indeed, accepted by Cuvier and all leading authorities up to the year 1830as the simplest forms of animal life, exhibiting a degree of organizationmost appropriately compared with mere specks of animate jelly variouslymodified in external shape.With the last-named date commenced an entirely new era in the historyof the Infusoria. For fourteen years previously Christian GottfriedEhrenberg had been devoting studious attention to the investigation ofthe lowest grades of vegetable and animal life, the matured fruits ofwhich now took the scientific world completely by surprise. He at thistime commenced the publication of his various essays, seeking to demonstratethat the Infusoria, notwithstanding their minute size, possessed adegree of organization as perfect and complex as that of the higheranimals, which culminated in the year 1838 in the production of his'world-famed history of the Infusoria, Die Infusionsthicrchen als VolkommeneOrganismen.' This magnificent folio treatise, embodying no lessthan 532 pages of letterpress and an accompanying atlas of 64 colouredplates, including several hundred specific forms delineated for the mostmemorial of thepart with a life-like exactitude, will ever remain a lastingunflagging industry and talent of this most indefatigable investigator.
- Page 3: aoamoa
- Page 6 and 7: "Our little systems have their day,
- Page 9: TOTHOMAS HENRY HUXLEY, LL.D.,F.R.S.
- Page 12 and 13: viiiPREFACE.experience some disappo
- Page 14 and 15: XPREFACE.ready and valuable assista
- Page 16 and 17: LEEUWENHOEtfS OBSERVATIONS. 3relate
- Page 18 and 19: LEEUWENHOEICS OBSERVATIONS.5spatter
- Page 20 and 21: LEEUWENHOEK'S OBSERVATIONS.Jstopped
- Page 22 and 23: SIfi E. KING, 1693. JOHN HARRIS, 16
- Page 24 and 25: STEPHEN GRA Y, 1696. LEEUWENHOEK, 1
- Page 26 and 27: HENRY BAKER, 1742, 1753.13"Oct. 6th
- Page 30 and 31: EHRENBERG, 1836. 17Notwithstanding
- Page 32 and 33: F. DUJARDIN, 1841. T. VON SIEBOLD,
- Page 34 and 35: FRIEDRICH STEIN, 1849-1854. 21cules
- Page 36 and 37: CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANN, 1858-1860.
- Page 38 and 39: F. STEIN, 1859. R. M. DIES ING, 184
- Page 40 and 41: ANDREW PRITCHARD, 1861. H. JAMES-CL
- Page 42 and 43: DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE, 1873-1875.
- Page 44 and 45: CHAPTER II.THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA
- Page 46 and 47: AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGIDA. 33ordin
- Page 48 and 49: PRIMARY SUBDIVISIONS A UTHOKS S YST
- Page 50 and 51: AUTHORS PHYLOGENETIC SCHEME. 37DIAG
- Page 52 and 53: FLA CELLA TA -PANTOS TOMA TA ; FLA
- Page 54 and 55: CHOANO-FLAGELLATA; MYCETOZOA. 41acc
- Page 56 and 57: MYCETOZOAj LABYRINTHULIDA. 43From t
- Page 58 and 59: GROUPS PROTISTA AND MONERA. 45of th
- Page 60 and 61: DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND PR
- Page 62 and 63: ( 49 )CHAPTER III.NATURE AND ORGANI
- Page 64 and 65: AUTHORS CLASSIFICATORY TABLE.TABULA
- Page 66 and 67: UNICELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 3dissolutio
- Page 68 and 69: UN1CELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 5of the ent
- Page 70 and 71: CUTICULAR ELEMENTS. 57substance the
- Page 72 and 73: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 59by the interca
- Page 74 and 75: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 6 1transparent,
- Page 76 and 77: ENCYSTMENT. 63corresponding type of
- Page 78 and 79:
LOCOMOTIVE AND PREHENSILE APPENDAGE
- Page 80 and 81:
ORAL APERTURE. 67Oral Aperture or C
- Page 82 and 83:
CONTRACTILE VESICLES. 69shadowed. A
- Page 84 and 85:
CONTRACTILE VESICLES.71in the major
- Page 86 and 87:
NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 73to indicate
- Page 88 and 89:
NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 75Spirostomit
- Page 90 and 91:
NUCLEOLUS OR ENDOPLASTULE. 77with t
- Page 92 and 93:
COLOURING SUBSTANCES. 79held to ind
- Page 94 and 95:
TRICHOCYSTS. 8 1crowded together an
- Page 96 and 97:
TRICHOCYSTS. 83follow it,and being
- Page 98 and 99:
BINARY DIVISION. 85that remain, red
- Page 100 and 101:
EXTERNAL GEMMATION. 87entire oblite
- Page 102 and 103:
SPORULAR MULTIPLICATION. 89four, ei
- Page 104 and 105:
GENE TIC REPROD UCTION. 9 1and the
- Page 106 and 107:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 93illustrated
- Page 108 and 109:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 95capsules we
- Page 110 and 111:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 97be essentia
- Page 112 and 113:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.90as known, i
- Page 114 and 115:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.IOIunicellula
- Page 116 and 117:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 103position.
- Page 118 and 119:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 105forming t
- Page 120 and 121:
DIS TRIE UTION. \ O 7plete covering
- Page 122 and 123:
DISTRIBUTION.IOQIn an enumeration o
- Page 124 and 125:
DISTRIBUTION. I Ihunting grounds. A
- Page 126 and 127:
PRESER VA TION. I 13Preservation of
- Page 128 and 129:
ME THODS OF INVES TIGA TION. I I5fo
- Page 130 and 131:
METHODS OF INVESTIGA TION.1 1^only
- Page 132 and 133:
RED I; TUBERVILLE NEEDHAM. 119simil
- Page 134 and 135:
JOHN HARRIS ; SPALLANZANI.l 2 rfor
- Page 136 and 137:
LORENZ OKEN; EHRENBERG. 123moment w
- Page 138 and 139:
POUCHET ; PASTEUR. 125Director of t
- Page 140 and 141:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 127now to be sup
- Page 142 and 143:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. I29needle-dip fr
- Page 144 and 145:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 131tubes, as giv
- Page 146 and 147:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE. 133four day
- Page 148 and 149:
A UTHOKS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 5and D
- Page 150 and 151:
A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 7or le
- Page 152 and 153:
AUTHOR'S INVESTIGATIONS. 139and lai
- Page 154 and 155:
A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 1 4 1clos
- Page 156 and 157:
( 143 )CHAPTER V.NATURE AND AFFINIT
- Page 158 and 159:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 160 and 161:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 162 and 163:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 164 and 165:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 166 and 167:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 168 and 169:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 170 and 171:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 172 and 173:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 174 and 175:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 176 and 177:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 178 and 179:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 180 and 181:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 182 and 183:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 184 and 185:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 186 and 187:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 188 and 189:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 190 and 191:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 192 and 193:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 194 and 195:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 196 and 197:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 198 and 199:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 200 and 201:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 202 and 203:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 204 and 205:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 206 and 207:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 208 and 209:
( 195 )CHAPTER VI.SYSTEMS OF CLASSI
- Page 210 and 211:
CLASSIFICATION OF THE INFUSORIA.197
- Page 212 and 213:
MULLERS CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 214 and 215:
EHRENBERG'S CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM.2
- Page 216 and 217:
CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS OF SIEBOLD A
- Page 218 and 219:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANWS CLASSIFICAT
- Page 220 and 221:
DIESINGS CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM. 207
- Page 222 and 223:
S TEIN'S CLA SSIFICA TOR Y S Ki TEM
- Page 224 and 225:
A UTHOKS CLASSIFICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 226 and 227:
A UTHOR'S CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM
- Page 228 and 229:
A UTHOKS CLASSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 230 and 231:
CLASS FLAGELLA TA. 2 I7more extensi
- Page 232 and 233:
GENUS TRYPANOSOMA. 219Trypanosoma s
- Page 234 and 235:
GENUS MASTIGAMCEBA . 221The some ha
- Page 236 and 237:
;,HAB.GENUS REPTOMONAS. 22$immediat
- Page 238 and 239:
ORDER RA DIO-FLA CELLA TA.225Podost
- Page 240 and 241:
Body subspherical orGENUS ACTINOMON
- Page 242 and 243:
GENUS SPONGASTERISCUS. 229Spongocyc
- Page 244 and 245:
Cladomonas.ipidodendrtSpongomonas.D