ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 103position. In the same way that the Opalinidae may be said to foreshadowthe Planula type of organization, it might be suggested that the ordinarystomatode Ciliata, and more especially the multinucleate species, anticipatethe next progressive developmental phase of the Metazoic embryo, as"Gastraea" or "Gastrula." The only advancerepresented by the typical in organization exhibited by this last-named type as compared with thePlanula is, that intercommunication between the central cavity and theouter world is now effected through the breaking away of the apical extremityof the primitive closed sac, this apical perforation or " cytostome "constituting the primitive mouth or oral aperture.As a rule, the Ciliate Infusorium develops, in addition to an oral orifice, asecond or anal aperture, but in many it is not distinctly represented in these;the conformity to the Gastraea type is necessarily all the more complete. ByProfessor Haeckel, to whom the scientific world is chiefly indebted forthe discovery of the three several "Morula," "Planula," and "Gastrula"developmental phases of the Metazoic series, it has been suggested that,in accordance with the laws of evolution, these successive transitory phasesdoubtless represent the permanent conditions of as many primitive andpre-existing Metazoic organisms, to which might be attached for conveniencethe hypothetic titles of " Arche-Morula," " Arche-Planula," and "Arche-Gastrula." From the foregoing data it isvery evident, however, that sucharchetypes are even yet in existence, and may be successfully sought foramong the representatives of the Protozoa.Entering now upon an examination of those few instances in whichrepresentatives of the Infusoria appear to pre-typify, not embryonic ortransient, but fully matured conditions of certain lower Metazoa, attentionmay be first directed to those forms, such as Paramecium and Ophryoglena,in which the subcuticular layer abounds with the minute evertile structuresknown as trichocysts. As already pointed out many years previously byKolliker, Oscar Schmidt, and other authorities, the correspondence betweensuch types and certain of the lower Annelida or Turbellaria is, so far asthe general form and the possession and disposition of theirtrichocysts isconcerned, most conspicuous, so that on a simple monocellular scale theseInfusoria may be said to foreshadow or pre-typify these simple Annelids. Ithas been suggested by Louis Agassiz, and also by Diesing, that the typicalVorticellidae, with their closely approximated oral and anal apertures andwell-developed pharyngeal tube, indicate a considerable conformance withthe fundamental organism of the Polyzoa the last-named authority, indeed,transferring this section of the Infusoria to that series. In its originallyimplied sense it is necessarily impossible to maintain such a proposedaffinity, but in a more remote manner, regarding such animalcules asmodifications of unicellular zooids in the direction indicated, it may perhapsbe accepted. While, as already intimated, Paramecium and its allieswould appear to pre-typify the Turbellaria, another more lowly organizedgroup of the Ciliata exhibits an entirely distinct and highly interesting
IO4ORGANIZA TION OF THE INFUSORIA.affinity.The group in question is that of the Opalinidae. The simplermembers of this section have been already compared with embryonicPlanulae, but in certain of the more highly modified representatives of thefamily the homoplastic resemblance to the similarly endoparasitic tapewormsor Cestoidea is most marvellous. Both are distinguished for theentire absence of an oral or anal aperture, and are in this respect imperforatesaccular bodies. Both occasionally develop horny hooklets or an acetabulateappendage at the anterior extremity wherewith to ensure a permanentadhesion to the internal viscera of the host infested. Both, moreover, sharein common a special mode of reproduction, which, while it recurs among thehigher Annelida, is met with nowhere else among the Protozoa. Referenceis here made to that peculiar form of terminal gemmation exhibited by theOpalina (A noplophryci) prolifcra of Claparede and Lachmann, and severalother allied forms, and in which a long series of buds or segments areproduced at the posterior extremity, and become successively liberated,like the segments or " proglottids " of an ordinary tape-worm.The affinities, real or apparent, of one important section of the Infusoria,that of the Tentaculifera, remain to be discussed. At first sight, thisitself andgroup, including Acineta and its allies, would seem to stand by to present no special homoplastic points of agreement with any Metazoictype. It isproposed here, however, to show that in more respects thanone these suctorial animalcules epitomize most conspicuously, though ona simple unicellular scale, the structural plan of the lower Hydrozoa.To illustrate this resemblance, the Hydroid Polypite in its simplestform, as represented by the so-called " "Dactylozooids recently discoveredby Mr. H. N. Moseley,* to play so important a part in the lifeeconomyof Millepora, Stylaster, and other coral-building Hydrozoa, maybe selected. Such a Dactylozooid or Polypite presents the aspect ofa long, slender, sinuous body, provided with numerous simple or knobbedtentacles, but is entirely devoid of any mouth or stomach. The function ofthese Polypites is simply to seize food and convey it to the mouth-bearingpolypes or " gastrozooids." There can be little doubt, however, that theserudimentary or secondary Polypites represent the primary and independentzooids of some more ancient stock, and the question naturally arises howin such a case did they ingest food ? In reply, it may be submitted that allthat is needed is a perforation of the extremity of each separate tentaculum,such as normally exists in many Ccelenterata, combined with the capacity ofincepting food at these orifices. It is this slight modification, furthermore,that is alone required to produce an organism fundamentally correspondingwith that of an ordinary suctorial Acineta, and whose only means of communicationwith the outer world is similarly through perforationsof theextremities of its prehensile tentacles. In one genus of the Acinetidae,Hemiophrya, it is further worthy of remark that certain of the tentacles only,and those the inner ones, are devoted to the ingestive function, while those* II. N. Moseley, "On the Structure of Millepora," 'Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.,' vol. clxvii. (1877).
- Page 3:
aoamoa
- Page 6 and 7:
"Our little systems have their day,
- Page 9:
TOTHOMAS HENRY HUXLEY, LL.D.,F.R.S.
- Page 12 and 13:
viiiPREFACE.experience some disappo
- Page 14 and 15:
XPREFACE.ready and valuable assista
- Page 16 and 17:
LEEUWENHOEtfS OBSERVATIONS. 3relate
- Page 18 and 19:
LEEUWENHOEICS OBSERVATIONS.5spatter
- Page 20 and 21:
LEEUWENHOEK'S OBSERVATIONS.Jstopped
- Page 22 and 23:
SIfi E. KING, 1693. JOHN HARRIS, 16
- Page 24 and 25:
STEPHEN GRA Y, 1696. LEEUWENHOEK, 1
- Page 26 and 27:
HENRY BAKER, 1742, 1753.13"Oct. 6th
- Page 28 and 29:
O. F. MULLER, 1773-1786. 15ledge of
- Page 30 and 31:
EHRENBERG, 1836. 17Notwithstanding
- Page 32 and 33:
F. DUJARDIN, 1841. T. VON SIEBOLD,
- Page 34 and 35:
FRIEDRICH STEIN, 1849-1854. 21cules
- Page 36 and 37:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANN, 1858-1860.
- Page 38 and 39:
F. STEIN, 1859. R. M. DIES ING, 184
- Page 40 and 41:
ANDREW PRITCHARD, 1861. H. JAMES-CL
- Page 42 and 43:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE, 1873-1875.
- Page 44 and 45:
CHAPTER II.THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA
- Page 46 and 47:
AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGIDA. 33ordin
- Page 48 and 49:
PRIMARY SUBDIVISIONS A UTHOKS S YST
- Page 50 and 51:
AUTHORS PHYLOGENETIC SCHEME. 37DIAG
- Page 52 and 53:
FLA CELLA TA -PANTOS TOMA TA ; FLA
- Page 54 and 55:
CHOANO-FLAGELLATA; MYCETOZOA. 41acc
- Page 56 and 57:
MYCETOZOAj LABYRINTHULIDA. 43From t
- Page 58 and 59:
GROUPS PROTISTA AND MONERA. 45of th
- Page 60 and 61:
DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND PR
- Page 62 and 63:
( 49 )CHAPTER III.NATURE AND ORGANI
- Page 64 and 65:
AUTHORS CLASSIFICATORY TABLE.TABULA
- Page 66 and 67: UNICELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 3dissolutio
- Page 68 and 69: UN1CELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 5of the ent
- Page 70 and 71: CUTICULAR ELEMENTS. 57substance the
- Page 72 and 73: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 59by the interca
- Page 74 and 75: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 6 1transparent,
- Page 76 and 77: ENCYSTMENT. 63corresponding type of
- Page 78 and 79: LOCOMOTIVE AND PREHENSILE APPENDAGE
- Page 80 and 81: ORAL APERTURE. 67Oral Aperture or C
- Page 82 and 83: CONTRACTILE VESICLES. 69shadowed. A
- Page 84 and 85: CONTRACTILE VESICLES.71in the major
- Page 86 and 87: NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 73to indicate
- Page 88 and 89: NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 75Spirostomit
- Page 90 and 91: NUCLEOLUS OR ENDOPLASTULE. 77with t
- Page 92 and 93: COLOURING SUBSTANCES. 79held to ind
- Page 94 and 95: TRICHOCYSTS. 8 1crowded together an
- Page 96 and 97: TRICHOCYSTS. 83follow it,and being
- Page 98 and 99: BINARY DIVISION. 85that remain, red
- Page 100 and 101: EXTERNAL GEMMATION. 87entire oblite
- Page 102 and 103: SPORULAR MULTIPLICATION. 89four, ei
- Page 104 and 105: GENE TIC REPROD UCTION. 9 1and the
- Page 106 and 107: GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 93illustrated
- Page 108 and 109: GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 95capsules we
- Page 110 and 111: GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 97be essentia
- Page 112 and 113: ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.90as known, i
- Page 114 and 115: ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.IOIunicellula
- Page 118 and 119: ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 105forming t
- Page 120 and 121: DIS TRIE UTION. \ O 7plete covering
- Page 122 and 123: DISTRIBUTION.IOQIn an enumeration o
- Page 124 and 125: DISTRIBUTION. I Ihunting grounds. A
- Page 126 and 127: PRESER VA TION. I 13Preservation of
- Page 128 and 129: ME THODS OF INVES TIGA TION. I I5fo
- Page 130 and 131: METHODS OF INVESTIGA TION.1 1^only
- Page 132 and 133: RED I; TUBERVILLE NEEDHAM. 119simil
- Page 134 and 135: JOHN HARRIS ; SPALLANZANI.l 2 rfor
- Page 136 and 137: LORENZ OKEN; EHRENBERG. 123moment w
- Page 138 and 139: POUCHET ; PASTEUR. 125Director of t
- Page 140 and 141: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 127now to be sup
- Page 142 and 143: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. I29needle-dip fr
- Page 144 and 145: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 131tubes, as giv
- Page 146 and 147: DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE. 133four day
- Page 148 and 149: A UTHOKS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 5and D
- Page 150 and 151: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 7or le
- Page 152 and 153: AUTHOR'S INVESTIGATIONS. 139and lai
- Page 154 and 155: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 1 4 1clos
- Page 156 and 157: ( 143 )CHAPTER V.NATURE AND AFFINIT
- Page 158 and 159: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 160 and 161: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 162 and 163: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 164 and 165: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 166 and 167:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 168 and 169:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 170 and 171:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 172 and 173:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 174 and 175:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 176 and 177:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 178 and 179:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 180 and 181:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 182 and 183:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 184 and 185:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 186 and 187:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 188 and 189:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 190 and 191:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 192 and 193:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 194 and 195:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 196 and 197:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 198 and 199:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 200 and 201:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 202 and 203:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 204 and 205:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 206 and 207:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 208 and 209:
( 195 )CHAPTER VI.SYSTEMS OF CLASSI
- Page 210 and 211:
CLASSIFICATION OF THE INFUSORIA.197
- Page 212 and 213:
MULLERS CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 214 and 215:
EHRENBERG'S CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM.2
- Page 216 and 217:
CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS OF SIEBOLD A
- Page 218 and 219:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANWS CLASSIFICAT
- Page 220 and 221:
DIESINGS CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM. 207
- Page 222 and 223:
S TEIN'S CLA SSIFICA TOR Y S Ki TEM
- Page 224 and 225:
A UTHOKS CLASSIFICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 226 and 227:
A UTHOR'S CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM
- Page 228 and 229:
A UTHOKS CLASSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 230 and 231:
CLASS FLAGELLA TA. 2 I7more extensi
- Page 232 and 233:
GENUS TRYPANOSOMA. 219Trypanosoma s
- Page 234 and 235:
GENUS MASTIGAMCEBA . 221The some ha
- Page 236 and 237:
;,HAB.GENUS REPTOMONAS. 22$immediat
- Page 238 and 239:
ORDER RA DIO-FLA CELLA TA.225Podost
- Page 240 and 241:
Body subspherical orGENUS ACTINOMON
- Page 242 and 243:
GENUS SPONGASTERISCUS. 229Spongocyc
- Page 244 and 245:
Cladomonas.ipidodendrtSpongomonas.D