FLA CELLA TA -PANTOS TOMA TA ; FLA CELLA TA-EUS TOMA TA. 39Lembtis, Condylostoma, and Spirochona, among the Ciliate class of theProtozoa. Furthermore, as recorded by the author in the systematicportion of this treatise, the characteristic adoral fringe of certain higherCiliata, such as Stentor and Euplotes, is developed through the splittingup of a similar primary undulating membrane.In the next cycle of advance, as exemplified in the order of the Rhizo-Flagellata, the several genera, Mastigamceba, Rhizomonas, and Podostoma,while retaining the general characteristics of repent or floating Amoeba,have superadded a distinct flagellum, and undoubtedly constitute the rootformsof several leading sections of the Protozoa hereafter referred to.The retraction of the pseudopodic processes of the Rhizo-Flagellata, withthe retention of the flagellum and capacity to incept food at any pointof the periphery,is alone required to perfect the passage to the nextsucceeding order, that of Flagellata-Pantostomata. In this group we finda considerable diversity in the number and character of the flagellateappendages, this organ being single in such simple types as Monas andBodo, double in Spumella and A nthophysa, while in others such as Tetramitus,Hexamita, and Lophomonas, the number isvery considerably increased. Itisamong the Polymastigous section of this order, somewhere near Lophomonas,that the remarkable compound marine type Magosphtzra planula,PI. I. Figs. 12-17, upon which Professor Haeckel has proposed to found anew class group entitled the Catallacta, should apparently be placed. Aspecial feature of Magospkcera, as described by Haeckel, is exhibited byits tendency to revert to a repent amoeboid phase pending the processof encystment and reproduction. A similar disposition is, however, ashereafter shown, shared by the majority of the Pantostomata.In proceeding to the next group or order in the direct line of evolution,the boundary line that circumscribes the class of the Pantostomata isnecessarily traversed, and the associated forms, while still characterizedby the possession of one or more flagellate appendages, exhibit theirhigher grade of organization through the development of a well-definedoral aperture. This order, upon which is here conferred the title of theFlagellata-Eustomata, embraces among its more familiar genera the typesEuglena, Astasia, Noctiluca, and Anisonema. The interesting order of theCilio-Flagellata, including chiefly the Peridiniidae and a few aberrantforms such as Heteromastix and Mallomonas, are alone wanting to makethe phylogenetic line from Amoeba to the most highly specialized classof the Protozoa, that of the typical Ciliata, entirety complete. Arrivingat the termination of this evolutionary line or phylum, it is requisiteto make a passing reference only to the group of the Opalinidae, which,although possessing no oral aperture, are plainly retrograde forms ofHolotrichous Ciliata, exhibiting, by reason of their endoparasitic habits, a.similar loss of this otherwise essential organof nutrition as obtains inthe corresponding parasitic Cestoidea among the Annelidous, or theRhizocephala among the Crustaceous sections of the Invertebrata.Returning once more to the Amcebina, and following out the line that
40 THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA.terminates in the Tentaculifera, the first important divergence from thepreceding track is encountered on arriving at the newly instituted order ofthe Radio-Flagellata. This small group, to which at present are referredthe four genera, Actinomonas, Spongocyclia, Spongasteriscus, and Euchitonia,may be said to retain the same relationship with respect to the ordinaryRadiolaria as subsists between the Rhizo-Flagellata and various otherorders of the Pantostomata. In the form Actinomonas, figured anddescribed for the first time in this volume, PI. I. Figs. 7, 8, and 18, thepermanent possession of a terminal vibratile flagellum alone distinguishesit from a stalked Heliozoidal Radiolarian such as Actinolophus in its nakedto be identical.phase, and with which typeit was presumed at first sightInversely, it needs only the withdrawal of the radiating pseudopodia, withthe retention of the flagellum, to produce the Pantostomatous Flagellategenus Oikomonas. The primary derivation of the entire Radiolarian orderfrom the Flagelliferous section of the Pantostomata is clearly indicated inassociation with the embryonic conditions of its representatives, and all ofwhich, so far as at present known, exhibit a Pantostomatous Flagellatestructure. The direct metamorphosis of such a simple flagellate zooidinto the Radiolarian type Actinophrys, as recently observed by the author,will be found recorded in the systematic description of the Radio-Flagellata,and is illustrated at PI. I. Figs. 9-11.The passage from the extensive group of the Radiolaria with its subsectionsof the Heliozoa, Monocyttaria, and Polycyttaria, onward to theTentaculifera, appears at first sight to be somewhat obscure. As shown,however, in the chapter devoted specially to their description, the Tentaculifera,as now known, form among themselves two natural subordinategroups or orders the :one, that of the Suctoria, being distinguished by thesucker-like form and function of the radiating tentacles ;while in the other,that of the Actinaria, these appendages closely resemble ordinary pseudopodia,being simply adhesive, and in some instances, e. g. Ephelota, invertile.The transition from the Radiolaria to the Tentaculifera isapparentlyaccomplished through this last-named group, such types as Zooteiraand Actinolophus on the one hand, and Ephelota and ActinocyatJnison the other, representing the most conspicuous connecting forms. TheTentaculifera, in their highest phase of development, exhibit several noteworthypeculiarities. The embryos do not, as with most Radiolaria, take aflagelliferous or monadiform contour, but are, while mouthless, more or lessthickly ciliate. The ciliation in the different genera and species, moreover,varies considerably, the several more important deviations in this respectexhibiting a remarkable conformity with the three types of ciliation thatcharacterize the three leading orders of the ordinary Ciliata, as distinguishedby the respective titles of the Holotricha, Hypotricha, and Peritricha. Onaccount of this last-named circumstance, it may be reasonably inferred thatsome genetic relationship subsists between the two sections of the Polystomataand Eustomata, this probable affinity being indicated in the
- Page 3: aoamoa
- Page 6 and 7: "Our little systems have their day,
- Page 9: TOTHOMAS HENRY HUXLEY, LL.D.,F.R.S.
- Page 12 and 13: viiiPREFACE.experience some disappo
- Page 14 and 15: XPREFACE.ready and valuable assista
- Page 16 and 17: LEEUWENHOEtfS OBSERVATIONS. 3relate
- Page 18 and 19: LEEUWENHOEICS OBSERVATIONS.5spatter
- Page 20 and 21: LEEUWENHOEK'S OBSERVATIONS.Jstopped
- Page 22 and 23: SIfi E. KING, 1693. JOHN HARRIS, 16
- Page 24 and 25: STEPHEN GRA Y, 1696. LEEUWENHOEK, 1
- Page 26 and 27: HENRY BAKER, 1742, 1753.13"Oct. 6th
- Page 28 and 29: O. F. MULLER, 1773-1786. 15ledge of
- Page 30 and 31: EHRENBERG, 1836. 17Notwithstanding
- Page 32 and 33: F. DUJARDIN, 1841. T. VON SIEBOLD,
- Page 34 and 35: FRIEDRICH STEIN, 1849-1854. 21cules
- Page 36 and 37: CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANN, 1858-1860.
- Page 38 and 39: F. STEIN, 1859. R. M. DIES ING, 184
- Page 40 and 41: ANDREW PRITCHARD, 1861. H. JAMES-CL
- Page 42 and 43: DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE, 1873-1875.
- Page 44 and 45: CHAPTER II.THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA
- Page 46 and 47: AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGIDA. 33ordin
- Page 48 and 49: PRIMARY SUBDIVISIONS A UTHOKS S YST
- Page 50 and 51: AUTHORS PHYLOGENETIC SCHEME. 37DIAG
- Page 54 and 55: CHOANO-FLAGELLATA; MYCETOZOA. 41acc
- Page 56 and 57: MYCETOZOAj LABYRINTHULIDA. 43From t
- Page 58 and 59: GROUPS PROTISTA AND MONERA. 45of th
- Page 60 and 61: DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND PR
- Page 62 and 63: ( 49 )CHAPTER III.NATURE AND ORGANI
- Page 64 and 65: AUTHORS CLASSIFICATORY TABLE.TABULA
- Page 66 and 67: UNICELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 3dissolutio
- Page 68 and 69: UN1CELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 5of the ent
- Page 70 and 71: CUTICULAR ELEMENTS. 57substance the
- Page 72 and 73: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 59by the interca
- Page 74 and 75: EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 6 1transparent,
- Page 76 and 77: ENCYSTMENT. 63corresponding type of
- Page 78 and 79: LOCOMOTIVE AND PREHENSILE APPENDAGE
- Page 80 and 81: ORAL APERTURE. 67Oral Aperture or C
- Page 82 and 83: CONTRACTILE VESICLES. 69shadowed. A
- Page 84 and 85: CONTRACTILE VESICLES.71in the major
- Page 86 and 87: NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 73to indicate
- Page 88 and 89: NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 75Spirostomit
- Page 90 and 91: NUCLEOLUS OR ENDOPLASTULE. 77with t
- Page 92 and 93: COLOURING SUBSTANCES. 79held to ind
- Page 94 and 95: TRICHOCYSTS. 8 1crowded together an
- Page 96 and 97: TRICHOCYSTS. 83follow it,and being
- Page 98 and 99: BINARY DIVISION. 85that remain, red
- Page 100 and 101: EXTERNAL GEMMATION. 87entire oblite
- Page 102 and 103:
SPORULAR MULTIPLICATION. 89four, ei
- Page 104 and 105:
GENE TIC REPROD UCTION. 9 1and the
- Page 106 and 107:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 93illustrated
- Page 108 and 109:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 95capsules we
- Page 110 and 111:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 97be essentia
- Page 112 and 113:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.90as known, i
- Page 114 and 115:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.IOIunicellula
- Page 116 and 117:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 103position.
- Page 118 and 119:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 105forming t
- Page 120 and 121:
DIS TRIE UTION. \ O 7plete covering
- Page 122 and 123:
DISTRIBUTION.IOQIn an enumeration o
- Page 124 and 125:
DISTRIBUTION. I Ihunting grounds. A
- Page 126 and 127:
PRESER VA TION. I 13Preservation of
- Page 128 and 129:
ME THODS OF INVES TIGA TION. I I5fo
- Page 130 and 131:
METHODS OF INVESTIGA TION.1 1^only
- Page 132 and 133:
RED I; TUBERVILLE NEEDHAM. 119simil
- Page 134 and 135:
JOHN HARRIS ; SPALLANZANI.l 2 rfor
- Page 136 and 137:
LORENZ OKEN; EHRENBERG. 123moment w
- Page 138 and 139:
POUCHET ; PASTEUR. 125Director of t
- Page 140 and 141:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 127now to be sup
- Page 142 and 143:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. I29needle-dip fr
- Page 144 and 145:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 131tubes, as giv
- Page 146 and 147:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE. 133four day
- Page 148 and 149:
A UTHOKS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 5and D
- Page 150 and 151:
A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 7or le
- Page 152 and 153:
AUTHOR'S INVESTIGATIONS. 139and lai
- Page 154 and 155:
A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 1 4 1clos
- Page 156 and 157:
( 143 )CHAPTER V.NATURE AND AFFINIT
- Page 158 and 159:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 160 and 161:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 162 and 163:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 164 and 165:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 166 and 167:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 168 and 169:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 170 and 171:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 172 and 173:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 174 and 175:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 176 and 177:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 178 and 179:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 180 and 181:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 182 and 183:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 184 and 185:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 186 and 187:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 188 and 189:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 190 and 191:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 192 and 193:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 194 and 195:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 196 and 197:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 198 and 199:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 200 and 201:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 202 and 203:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 204 and 205:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 206 and 207:
NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 208 and 209:
( 195 )CHAPTER VI.SYSTEMS OF CLASSI
- Page 210 and 211:
CLASSIFICATION OF THE INFUSORIA.197
- Page 212 and 213:
MULLERS CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 214 and 215:
EHRENBERG'S CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM.2
- Page 216 and 217:
CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS OF SIEBOLD A
- Page 218 and 219:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANWS CLASSIFICAT
- Page 220 and 221:
DIESINGS CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM. 207
- Page 222 and 223:
S TEIN'S CLA SSIFICA TOR Y S Ki TEM
- Page 224 and 225:
A UTHOKS CLASSIFICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 226 and 227:
A UTHOR'S CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM
- Page 228 and 229:
A UTHOKS CLASSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 230 and 231:
CLASS FLAGELLA TA. 2 I7more extensi
- Page 232 and 233:
GENUS TRYPANOSOMA. 219Trypanosoma s
- Page 234 and 235:
GENUS MASTIGAMCEBA . 221The some ha
- Page 236 and 237:
;,HAB.GENUS REPTOMONAS. 22$immediat
- Page 238 and 239:
ORDER RA DIO-FLA CELLA TA.225Podost
- Page 240 and 241:
Body subspherical orGENUS ACTINOMON
- Page 242 and 243:
GENUS SPONGASTERISCUS. 229Spongocyc
- Page 244 and 245:
Cladomonas.ipidodendrtSpongomonas.D