NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGES. 167is presented. The component sarcode of the monad's bodyin this lattercase isapparently of thinner or more fluid consistence, permitting of rapidand protean changes of form on the slightest irritation or other stimulus.Thus, when a dissection is made of any living sponge,such as Grantiacompressa, it is found requisite to examine rapidly with the microscopein order to witness the constituent monads with their collars and flagellain the normal condition of extension ; otherwise, within the space of a fewminutes, these organs are, one or both, more or less completely retracted,and their former possessors creeping about the field, or remaining congregatedin clusters under conditions that render them indistinguishable fromordinary Flagellate monads, or simple amoebae. In this latter instance,they are, indeed, identical in all respects with the amcebiform zooids orcytoblasts scattered throughout the common gelatinous central matrix orcytoblastema of the sponge-body. The more conspicuous modificationsof form assumed at will by the collared sponge-monads, either with thecollar and flagellum extended with the former organ alone, or with bothof these two retracted, will be found abundantly illustrated in Figs. 2-38of PI. VIIL, devoted especially to the histology of the Spongida.them two or three examples occur which deserve particular notice.AmongThus,at Fig. 17 of the plate quoted,isrepresented an individual monad which,after the retraction of the collar and flagellum, has thrown out innumerablelong slender pseudopodia, which convey to it an appearance highlysuggestive of that of the Radiolarian type Actinophrys. Other examples,exhibiting in a less degree the same plan of metamorphosis, are alsodelineated in connection with the groups or isolated examples numberedrespectively 12, 14, 15, 16, 20, and 24. In Figs. 29, 30, 31, a modification inan entirely different direction is shown. Here, with the collars and flagellaentirely withdrawn, as before, slender pseudopodia are emitted from the periphery,terminating in distinctly capitatespecialized suctorial tentacles of the Acinetidae. Recoveringextremities which recall to mind thefrom the disturbinginfluence which has brought about any of the various metamorphosesabove enumerated, the emitted pseudopodia or lobate sarcode extensionsare, after a while, drawn in, and the normal form with the extended collarand flagellum again assumed. At Fig. 18 of PL VIII. will be foundexamples of such sponge-monads, which after a short tenure of a vagrantamoeboid condition, have reattached themselves to a minute spiculum of theparent sponge, and resumed the customary aspect of the typical Spongozoa.Were it not explained that these readherent collared monads belongedto a sponge-stock,it would be impossible to distinguish them from therepresentatives of such independent collared animalcules as MonosigaSteinii, represented at PI. IV. Fig. 12. The collared sponge-monads, thusreattached, soon throw out around them a thin investing film of hyalinecytoblastema, as shown at Figs. 19, 21, and 22, and are thus capable,without any other extraneous assistance, of either repairing a mutilatedsponge-stock, or of building up an entirely new one. With reference to
1 68 NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGES.the feeding capacities of the sponge-monads, it may be here noted, thatthe phenomena of nutrition are preciselyidentical with those exhibitedby the independent collared species, the selected pabulum being arrested bythe hyaline collar and carried with its circulating current into the bodyof the animalcule. Examples are given at PI. VIII. Figs. 9 and 19, inwhich the bodies of the neighbouring sponge-monads are rilled with ingestedand artificially administered carmine particles. Such functions of nutritionare, however, not confined to the collared zooids ;the amoebiform unitsor cytoblasts being equally capable, as shown at Fig. 41 of the same plate,of ingesting solid pabulum.Examining the matter more closely, it has now to be shown that eventhe special differences already cited as indicating a distinction between theSpongida, independent collared monads, and ordinary Infusoria, are scarcelymore substantial than those found to exist between the more conspicuouslydivergent representatives of the same groups or orders of the lastnamedsection. Taking, in illustration of this analogy, the very familiargroup of the Vorticellidae, we find in Vorticella, or more correctly, in thestiff-stalked form Rhabdostyla and in the compound type Epistylis, theprecise analogues of the solitary collared type Monosiga and the socialgenus Codosiga. Proceeding yet a step further, the slime- immersed colonialtype Ophrydium is beyond doubt comparable in a like manner to thecolonial slime-immersed genus Phalansterium. Beyond this it is notpossible, as yet, to institute a direct comparison, but, supposing that agenus of colonial slime-immersed Vorticellidae should be discovered inwhich the animalcules, instead of projecting directly into the surroundingwater through the peripheral surface of their common matrix, as obtains inOphrydium, were enclosed within chambers which communicated with eachother, and with the outer water, by a system of interconnecting canals ;supposing also that all the spores, germs, encystments, or other reproductiveproducts remained embedded and developed to maturity withinthe common matrix, a type of the Vorticellidae would be produced presentinga parallel to Ophrydium precisely identical with what actuallyexists between the most simple known sponge and Phalansterium*With the assistance of Plates VII. to X. it is now proposed to draw* At the eleventh hour, while going to press, the author has had the good fortune to light upona new and highly interesting representative of the independent collared series, that illustrates ina yet more decisive manner the close relationship of this group to the Spongida. The type inquestion, represented at PI. X. Figs. 20-30, and hereafter described under the title of ProtospongiaHaeckeli, agrees with Phalansterium, so far as the zooids are immersed within a common gelatinousmatrix or zoocytium. The characteristic collars are, however, fully developed in place of beingrudimentary as in the last-named genus, while the inhabited gelatinous matrix is perfectly transparentand homogeneous instead of densely granular. Within their matrix the zooids were observedto assume various metamorphic amoeboid conditions, to multiply both by the process of binarysubdivision and by the partition of their entire mass into sporular elements. The resultants ofthe last reproductive process commence their active existence as simple, minute, uniflagellatemonads, which project, as shown at Fig. 22 b b, from the periphery of the zoocytium side byside with the adult collared units. This interesting species which, in its mature condition, correspondsin a most remarkable and significant manner with a fragment of cytoblastema, with itsenclosed collared zooids, amcebiform cytoblasts, and sporular elements, of any typical spongeform,was obtained by the author in July 1 880, in water brought from the lake in Kew Gardens.
- Page 3:
aoamoa
- Page 6 and 7:
"Our little systems have their day,
- Page 9:
TOTHOMAS HENRY HUXLEY, LL.D.,F.R.S.
- Page 12 and 13:
viiiPREFACE.experience some disappo
- Page 14 and 15:
XPREFACE.ready and valuable assista
- Page 16 and 17:
LEEUWENHOEtfS OBSERVATIONS. 3relate
- Page 18 and 19:
LEEUWENHOEICS OBSERVATIONS.5spatter
- Page 20 and 21:
LEEUWENHOEK'S OBSERVATIONS.Jstopped
- Page 22 and 23:
SIfi E. KING, 1693. JOHN HARRIS, 16
- Page 24 and 25:
STEPHEN GRA Y, 1696. LEEUWENHOEK, 1
- Page 26 and 27:
HENRY BAKER, 1742, 1753.13"Oct. 6th
- Page 28 and 29:
O. F. MULLER, 1773-1786. 15ledge of
- Page 30 and 31:
EHRENBERG, 1836. 17Notwithstanding
- Page 32 and 33:
F. DUJARDIN, 1841. T. VON SIEBOLD,
- Page 34 and 35:
FRIEDRICH STEIN, 1849-1854. 21cules
- Page 36 and 37:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANN, 1858-1860.
- Page 38 and 39:
F. STEIN, 1859. R. M. DIES ING, 184
- Page 40 and 41:
ANDREW PRITCHARD, 1861. H. JAMES-CL
- Page 42 and 43:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE, 1873-1875.
- Page 44 and 45:
CHAPTER II.THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA
- Page 46 and 47:
AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGIDA. 33ordin
- Page 48 and 49:
PRIMARY SUBDIVISIONS A UTHOKS S YST
- Page 50 and 51:
AUTHORS PHYLOGENETIC SCHEME. 37DIAG
- Page 52 and 53:
FLA CELLA TA -PANTOS TOMA TA ; FLA
- Page 54 and 55:
CHOANO-FLAGELLATA; MYCETOZOA. 41acc
- Page 56 and 57:
MYCETOZOAj LABYRINTHULIDA. 43From t
- Page 58 and 59:
GROUPS PROTISTA AND MONERA. 45of th
- Page 60 and 61:
DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND PR
- Page 62 and 63:
( 49 )CHAPTER III.NATURE AND ORGANI
- Page 64 and 65:
AUTHORS CLASSIFICATORY TABLE.TABULA
- Page 66 and 67:
UNICELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 3dissolutio
- Page 68 and 69:
UN1CELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 5of the ent
- Page 70 and 71:
CUTICULAR ELEMENTS. 57substance the
- Page 72 and 73:
EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 59by the interca
- Page 74 and 75:
EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 6 1transparent,
- Page 76 and 77:
ENCYSTMENT. 63corresponding type of
- Page 78 and 79:
LOCOMOTIVE AND PREHENSILE APPENDAGE
- Page 80 and 81:
ORAL APERTURE. 67Oral Aperture or C
- Page 82 and 83:
CONTRACTILE VESICLES. 69shadowed. A
- Page 84 and 85:
CONTRACTILE VESICLES.71in the major
- Page 86 and 87:
NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 73to indicate
- Page 88 and 89:
NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 75Spirostomit
- Page 90 and 91:
NUCLEOLUS OR ENDOPLASTULE. 77with t
- Page 92 and 93:
COLOURING SUBSTANCES. 79held to ind
- Page 94 and 95:
TRICHOCYSTS. 8 1crowded together an
- Page 96 and 97:
TRICHOCYSTS. 83follow it,and being
- Page 98 and 99:
BINARY DIVISION. 85that remain, red
- Page 100 and 101:
EXTERNAL GEMMATION. 87entire oblite
- Page 102 and 103:
SPORULAR MULTIPLICATION. 89four, ei
- Page 104 and 105:
GENE TIC REPROD UCTION. 9 1and the
- Page 106 and 107:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 93illustrated
- Page 108 and 109:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 95capsules we
- Page 110 and 111:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 97be essentia
- Page 112 and 113:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.90as known, i
- Page 114 and 115:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.IOIunicellula
- Page 116 and 117:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 103position.
- Page 118 and 119:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 105forming t
- Page 120 and 121:
DIS TRIE UTION. \ O 7plete covering
- Page 122 and 123:
DISTRIBUTION.IOQIn an enumeration o
- Page 124 and 125:
DISTRIBUTION. I Ihunting grounds. A
- Page 126 and 127:
PRESER VA TION. I 13Preservation of
- Page 128 and 129:
ME THODS OF INVES TIGA TION. I I5fo
- Page 130 and 131: METHODS OF INVESTIGA TION.1 1^only
- Page 132 and 133: RED I; TUBERVILLE NEEDHAM. 119simil
- Page 134 and 135: JOHN HARRIS ; SPALLANZANI.l 2 rfor
- Page 136 and 137: LORENZ OKEN; EHRENBERG. 123moment w
- Page 138 and 139: POUCHET ; PASTEUR. 125Director of t
- Page 140 and 141: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 127now to be sup
- Page 142 and 143: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. I29needle-dip fr
- Page 144 and 145: PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 131tubes, as giv
- Page 146 and 147: DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE. 133four day
- Page 148 and 149: A UTHOKS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 5and D
- Page 150 and 151: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 7or le
- Page 152 and 153: AUTHOR'S INVESTIGATIONS. 139and lai
- Page 154 and 155: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 1 4 1clos
- Page 156 and 157: ( 143 )CHAPTER V.NATURE AND AFFINIT
- Page 158 and 159: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 160 and 161: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 162 and 163: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 164 and 165: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 166 and 167: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 168 and 169: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 170 and 171: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 172 and 173: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 174 and 175: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 176 and 177: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 178 and 179: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 182 and 183: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 184 and 185: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 186 and 187: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 188 and 189: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 190 and 191: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 192 and 193: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 194 and 195: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 196 and 197: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 198 and 199: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 200 and 201: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 202 and 203: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 204 and 205: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 206 and 207: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 208 and 209: ( 195 )CHAPTER VI.SYSTEMS OF CLASSI
- Page 210 and 211: CLASSIFICATION OF THE INFUSORIA.197
- Page 212 and 213: MULLERS CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 214 and 215: EHRENBERG'S CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM.2
- Page 216 and 217: CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS OF SIEBOLD A
- Page 218 and 219: CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANWS CLASSIFICAT
- Page 220 and 221: DIESINGS CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM. 207
- Page 222 and 223: S TEIN'S CLA SSIFICA TOR Y S Ki TEM
- Page 224 and 225: A UTHOKS CLASSIFICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 226 and 227: A UTHOR'S CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM
- Page 228 and 229: A UTHOKS CLASSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 230 and 231:
CLASS FLAGELLA TA. 2 I7more extensi
- Page 232 and 233:
GENUS TRYPANOSOMA. 219Trypanosoma s
- Page 234 and 235:
GENUS MASTIGAMCEBA . 221The some ha
- Page 236 and 237:
;,HAB.GENUS REPTOMONAS. 22$immediat
- Page 238 and 239:
ORDER RA DIO-FLA CELLA TA.225Podost
- Page 240 and 241:
Body subspherical orGENUS ACTINOMON
- Page 242 and 243:
GENUS SPONGASTERISCUS. 229Spongocyc
- Page 244 and 245:
Cladomonas.ipidodendrtSpongomonas.D