NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGES. 185exhibits various phases of unevenness which may be thus explained. In allthree, the posterior half has developed considerably in advance of theanterior one, but exhibits in the first figure its typical composition of collarbearingmonads;in the other two, on the other hand, the posterior basalelements have passed from the collar-bearing to the amoeboid state, andcoalesced more or less extensively with each other. In a like manner, theelements of the anterior half in both of the Figs. 26 and 27 represent theimmature and simply flagellate phases of the collared zooids, but which inFig. 28 have acquired their characteristic adult form. The life-history andvarious developmental phases of the free-swimming ciliated sponge-gemmulesare, in fact, epitomizations only of the phenomena already describedof the collared zooids of the adult sponge-stock. Here, as there, theessential constituents, or collared zooids, of the colonial aggregation, commencelife as simple flagellate units, which, after attaining their typicaladult form, assume successively an amoeboid and quiescent state, and giverise by minute sporular subdivision to a further progeny of collared zooids.As a clear indication of the common origin and significance of both themoruloid and amphiblastuloid sponge-gemmules, with their various modifications,it needs only to be recorded that every one of these seeminglydistinct structures has been met with by the author in a single spongestockof Grantia compressa, and also in Leucosolenia botryoides and Grantia(Sycori) ciliatum, as obtained both in the Channel Islands in the years1877-8, and on the South Devon and Cornish coast in 1879. Fromthe last examined examples, furthermore, sections containing thesegemmules in abundance, treated with osmic acid, have been successfullypreserved for permanent reference and comparison. It is, moreover,in connection with the first-named sponge-form (Grantia compressa}that Barrois has reported the occurrence of that variety of the amphiblastuloidgemmule, in which a ring of intermediate non-flagellate cellsare developed equatorially between the typical flagellate and amoeboidseries. The latter elements, as shown at PI. IX. Fig. 30, are of somewhatabnormal size, and, as in many other of the examples figured, are far toolarge to have represented individually a primarily single collared zooid.This phenomenon, as also that of the presence of the equatorial girdle ofsmaller cells in the example cited, admits of simultaneous explanation.The equatorial girdle, in fact, may be interpreted as representing an anteriorring of amoeboid cells metamorphosed from the typical collared units at aslightly later date than those of the posterior area, and which latter havebecome still more obscurely transformed and increased in size, thoughlessened in number, by coalescence. It is by a similar process of retrogressionto an amoeboid type, and the more or less extensive union orcoalescence of amoeboid zooids that the ciliated gemmules themselvesoriginate.In addition to the various symmetricallyconstructed moruloid andamphiblastuloid modifications of the ciliated sponge-gemmule already
1 86 NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGES.enumerated, it has yet to be recorded that it very commonly happens thatthese structures present an altogether irregular and asymmetrical contour.Illustrations of such irregular formations, as figured by Oscar Schmidt, ofGrantia (Sycandrd) compressa, and as observed by the author, willbe foundreproduced at PI. IX. Figs. 32 and 35. Such asymmetrically developedgemmules may retain fundamentally the moruloid or amphiblastuloidstructural type, being in the one case composed entirely of similar and inthe other case of dissimilar constituents. The fact that these variousirregularly formed gemmules are by no means of rare occurrence, maybe accepted as furnishing supplementary evidence in demonstration of thenon-correspondence of these sponge-gemmules, or so-called ciliated larvae,with the embryos of the typical Metazoa, and in which latter organicseries the production of asymmetrical germs is quite exceptional. One ofthe strongest arguments furnished in support of the essentially Protozoicsignificance of these reproductive bodies is, undoubtedly, afforded by theindependently contributed testimony of Oscar Schmidt and Metschnikoff,by both of whom it is shown that in the case of Ascetta primordialis,the component flagellate elements of the moruloid gemmule assumequite independently an amoeboid condition, and retiring separately intothe central segmentation cavity, undergo their further metamorphoses.Ultimately, these separately retreating amoebiform units completely fillup the central cavity, and burst through the posterior region of theciliated body, project at this extremity, and so produce in a roundaboutmanner a pseudo-amphiblastula. It will be at once recognized thatwhile this peculiar developmental phenomenon of the sponge-gemmuleexhibited by Ascetta primordialis, is altogether opposed to anything thatobtains among the Metazoic series, it is at once reconcilable with aProtozoic interpretation. With their near allies the simple flagellate orcollared monads, e.g. Phalansterhim,Spongomonas, and Protospongia, parallelphenomena, including the assumption by the adult zooids of an amoeboidstate, and their retreat within the common gelatinous cytoblastema-likematrix, or zoocytium, represents the normal reproductive process.The highly important evidence that demonstrates the thoroughgoingProtozoic affinities of the sponge with relation to the primary origin anddevelopment within the parent sponge-stock of the free-swimming ciliatedgemmules, has yet to be submitted. The initial condition of these reproductivestructures, as conceded unanimously by the independent testimonyof every investigator, takes the form of an amcebiform body, varying in sizefrom the i-3OOOth to the i-2OOth of an English inch, and presents a considerablelikeness to the primary condition of an ordinary ovum. With,however, the interpretation of the significance and subsequent evolution ofthis amcebiform structure that is most generally advocated, the author hasto declare himself entirely at issue. In accordance with this more widelyaccepted view, the amcebiform body is a true ovum, developed separatelyand independently in the interstitial substance of the sponge, and after-
- Page 3:
aoamoa
- Page 6 and 7:
"Our little systems have their day,
- Page 9:
TOTHOMAS HENRY HUXLEY, LL.D.,F.R.S.
- Page 12 and 13:
viiiPREFACE.experience some disappo
- Page 14 and 15:
XPREFACE.ready and valuable assista
- Page 16 and 17:
LEEUWENHOEtfS OBSERVATIONS. 3relate
- Page 18 and 19:
LEEUWENHOEICS OBSERVATIONS.5spatter
- Page 20 and 21:
LEEUWENHOEK'S OBSERVATIONS.Jstopped
- Page 22 and 23:
SIfi E. KING, 1693. JOHN HARRIS, 16
- Page 24 and 25:
STEPHEN GRA Y, 1696. LEEUWENHOEK, 1
- Page 26 and 27:
HENRY BAKER, 1742, 1753.13"Oct. 6th
- Page 28 and 29:
O. F. MULLER, 1773-1786. 15ledge of
- Page 30 and 31:
EHRENBERG, 1836. 17Notwithstanding
- Page 32 and 33:
F. DUJARDIN, 1841. T. VON SIEBOLD,
- Page 34 and 35:
FRIEDRICH STEIN, 1849-1854. 21cules
- Page 36 and 37:
CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANN, 1858-1860.
- Page 38 and 39:
F. STEIN, 1859. R. M. DIES ING, 184
- Page 40 and 41:
ANDREW PRITCHARD, 1861. H. JAMES-CL
- Page 42 and 43:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE, 1873-1875.
- Page 44 and 45:
CHAPTER II.THE SUB-KINGDOM PROTOZOA
- Page 46 and 47:
AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGIDA. 33ordin
- Page 48 and 49:
PRIMARY SUBDIVISIONS A UTHOKS S YST
- Page 50 and 51:
AUTHORS PHYLOGENETIC SCHEME. 37DIAG
- Page 52 and 53:
FLA CELLA TA -PANTOS TOMA TA ; FLA
- Page 54 and 55:
CHOANO-FLAGELLATA; MYCETOZOA. 41acc
- Page 56 and 57:
MYCETOZOAj LABYRINTHULIDA. 43From t
- Page 58 and 59:
GROUPS PROTISTA AND MONERA. 45of th
- Page 60 and 61:
DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND PR
- Page 62 and 63:
( 49 )CHAPTER III.NATURE AND ORGANI
- Page 64 and 65:
AUTHORS CLASSIFICATORY TABLE.TABULA
- Page 66 and 67:
UNICELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 3dissolutio
- Page 68 and 69:
UN1CELL ULAR NA TURE. 5 5of the ent
- Page 70 and 71:
CUTICULAR ELEMENTS. 57substance the
- Page 72 and 73:
EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 59by the interca
- Page 74 and 75:
EXCRETED ELEMENTS. 6 1transparent,
- Page 76 and 77:
ENCYSTMENT. 63corresponding type of
- Page 78 and 79:
LOCOMOTIVE AND PREHENSILE APPENDAGE
- Page 80 and 81:
ORAL APERTURE. 67Oral Aperture or C
- Page 82 and 83:
CONTRACTILE VESICLES. 69shadowed. A
- Page 84 and 85:
CONTRACTILE VESICLES.71in the major
- Page 86 and 87:
NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 73to indicate
- Page 88 and 89:
NUCLEUS OR ENDOPLAST. 75Spirostomit
- Page 90 and 91:
NUCLEOLUS OR ENDOPLASTULE. 77with t
- Page 92 and 93:
COLOURING SUBSTANCES. 79held to ind
- Page 94 and 95:
TRICHOCYSTS. 8 1crowded together an
- Page 96 and 97:
TRICHOCYSTS. 83follow it,and being
- Page 98 and 99:
BINARY DIVISION. 85that remain, red
- Page 100 and 101:
EXTERNAL GEMMATION. 87entire oblite
- Page 102 and 103:
SPORULAR MULTIPLICATION. 89four, ei
- Page 104 and 105:
GENE TIC REPROD UCTION. 9 1and the
- Page 106 and 107:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 93illustrated
- Page 108 and 109:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 95capsules we
- Page 110 and 111:
GENETIC REPRODUCTION. 97be essentia
- Page 112 and 113:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.90as known, i
- Page 114 and 115:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES.IOIunicellula
- Page 116 and 117:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 103position.
- Page 118 and 119:
ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES. 105forming t
- Page 120 and 121:
DIS TRIE UTION. \ O 7plete covering
- Page 122 and 123:
DISTRIBUTION.IOQIn an enumeration o
- Page 124 and 125:
DISTRIBUTION. I Ihunting grounds. A
- Page 126 and 127:
PRESER VA TION. I 13Preservation of
- Page 128 and 129:
ME THODS OF INVES TIGA TION. I I5fo
- Page 130 and 131:
METHODS OF INVESTIGA TION.1 1^only
- Page 132 and 133:
RED I; TUBERVILLE NEEDHAM. 119simil
- Page 134 and 135:
JOHN HARRIS ; SPALLANZANI.l 2 rfor
- Page 136 and 137:
LORENZ OKEN; EHRENBERG. 123moment w
- Page 138 and 139:
POUCHET ; PASTEUR. 125Director of t
- Page 140 and 141:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 127now to be sup
- Page 142 and 143:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. I29needle-dip fr
- Page 144 and 145:
PROFESSOR TYNDALL. 131tubes, as giv
- Page 146 and 147:
DALLINGER AND DRYSDALE. 133four day
- Page 148 and 149: A UTHOKS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 5and D
- Page 150 and 151: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 13 7or le
- Page 152 and 153: AUTHOR'S INVESTIGATIONS. 139and lai
- Page 154 and 155: A UTHORS INVESTIGA TIONS. 1 4 1clos
- Page 156 and 157: ( 143 )CHAPTER V.NATURE AND AFFINIT
- Page 158 and 159: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 160 and 161: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 162 and 163: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 164 and 165: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 166 and 167: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 168 and 169: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 170 and 171: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 172 and 173: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 174 and 175: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 176 and 177: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 178 and 179: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 180 and 181: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 182 and 183: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 184 and 185: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 186 and 187: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 188 and 189: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 190 and 191: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 192 and 193: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 194 and 195: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 196 and 197: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 200 and 201: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 202 and 203: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 204 and 205: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 206 and 207: NATURE AND AFFINITIES OF THE SPONGE
- Page 208 and 209: ( 195 )CHAPTER VI.SYSTEMS OF CLASSI
- Page 210 and 211: CLASSIFICATION OF THE INFUSORIA.197
- Page 212 and 213: MULLERS CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 214 and 215: EHRENBERG'S CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM.2
- Page 216 and 217: CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEMS OF SIEBOLD A
- Page 218 and 219: CLAPAREDE AND LACHMANWS CLASSIFICAT
- Page 220 and 221: DIESINGS CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM. 207
- Page 222 and 223: S TEIN'S CLA SSIFICA TOR Y S Ki TEM
- Page 224 and 225: A UTHOKS CLASSIFICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 226 and 227: A UTHOR'S CLA SSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM
- Page 228 and 229: A UTHOKS CLASSIPICA TOR Y S YSTEM.
- Page 230 and 231: CLASS FLAGELLA TA. 2 I7more extensi
- Page 232 and 233: GENUS TRYPANOSOMA. 219Trypanosoma s
- Page 234 and 235: GENUS MASTIGAMCEBA . 221The some ha
- Page 236 and 237: ;,HAB.GENUS REPTOMONAS. 22$immediat
- Page 238 and 239: ORDER RA DIO-FLA CELLA TA.225Podost
- Page 240 and 241: Body subspherical orGENUS ACTINOMON
- Page 242 and 243: GENUS SPONGASTERISCUS. 229Spongocyc
- Page 244 and 245: Cladomonas.ipidodendrtSpongomonas.D