13.07.2015 Views

Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times - Conscious Evolution TV

Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times - Conscious Evolution TV

Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126robin-bobin <strong>Rapture</strong>, <strong>Revelation</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>End</strong> <strong>Times</strong>to <strong>the</strong> blessedness that <strong>the</strong> dead in Christ enjoy as disembodiedsouls during <strong>the</strong> thous<strong>and</strong> years, in eternity <strong>the</strong> righteous willreign in <strong>the</strong>ir resurrected bodies forever. Proponents believe that<strong>the</strong>ir case is streng<strong>the</strong>ned by <strong>the</strong> precise verb form that John <strong>the</strong>Seer uses in <strong>the</strong> text. Both verbs in verse 4 (“lived” <strong>and</strong> “reigned”)are in what is known in <strong>the</strong> Greek language in which <strong>the</strong> NewTestament was written as <strong>the</strong> aorist tense. Because both verbsare in <strong>the</strong> same tense, both must be translated in a parallel manner.And because <strong>the</strong>y are aorist, a verb form that rarely refersto <strong>the</strong> inception of an action, <strong>the</strong>y do not speak of an action thatoccurs at <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> thous<strong>and</strong> years. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> entireperiod is in view. Consequently, it is incorrect to interpret <strong>the</strong>first verb as indicating an event occurring at <strong>the</strong> beginning of<strong>the</strong> millennium <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> second as a state of being throughout<strong>the</strong> era, as dem<strong>and</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> premillennial eschatology. The besttranslation of <strong>the</strong> text, proponents conclude, is simply “<strong>the</strong>ylived <strong>and</strong> reigned with Christ a thous<strong>and</strong> years.” 28The principle that <strong>Revelation</strong> 20 must be understood inaccordance with <strong>the</strong> plain teaching of <strong>the</strong> New Testament is evidentas well in <strong>the</strong> amillennial interpretation of <strong>the</strong> symbol of<strong>the</strong> binding of Satan. The proper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong> visionof <strong>the</strong> thous<strong>and</strong> years, amillennialists claim, dem<strong>and</strong>s a returnto <strong>the</strong> declaration found elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> New Testament thatin his ministry Jesus bound his enemy. The Lord himself indicatedthat such an act was necessary for him to release Satan’s captives(Matt. 12:24–29). This claim, in turn, forms <strong>the</strong> basisfor <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me found repeatedly in <strong>the</strong> New Testament that in hislife, death, <strong>and</strong> resurrection Jesus has triumphed over <strong>the</strong> powerof evil (e.g., Matt. 4:1–11; Luke 9:1, 10:17–20; John 12:31–33;Col. 2:14–15; Heb. 2:14; 1 John 4:8). Even <strong>the</strong> book of<strong>Revelation</strong> gives evidence to <strong>the</strong> correctness of this interpretation,adherents assert, for <strong>the</strong> twelfth chapter, which forms <strong>the</strong>center of <strong>the</strong> book, depicts Christ’s coronation as bringingabout <strong>the</strong> ejection of Satan from heaven.Premillennialists argue that <strong>the</strong> binding of Satan must befuture because <strong>the</strong> devil is obviously active in <strong>the</strong> world (e.g.,1 Pet. 5:8). In response, amillennialists join postmillennialists inrobin-bobin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!