13.07.2015 Views

Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times - Conscious Evolution TV

Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times - Conscious Evolution TV

Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82robin-bobin <strong>Rapture</strong>, <strong>Revelation</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>End</strong> <strong>Times</strong>when Christ returns, but is that <strong>the</strong> same as people mysteriouslydisappearing while o<strong>the</strong>rs continue <strong>the</strong>ir normal lives?”Premillennial dispensationalists (including LaHaye <strong>and</strong> Jenkins)believe in a chronology such as: (1) a rapture, in which trueChristians are taken up to heaven; (2) a seven-year period of difficultiescalled <strong>the</strong> “tribulation” for all of <strong>the</strong> people whoremain on earth; <strong>and</strong> (3) <strong>the</strong> glorious appearing of Jesus todefeat evil <strong>and</strong> initiate a thous<strong>and</strong>-year reign on earth called <strong>the</strong>“millennium.” As discussed elsewhere in this book, some o<strong>the</strong>rpersons who believe in a rapture place it in <strong>the</strong> middle or at <strong>the</strong>end of a period of tribulation, instead of before it. The questionis, do <strong>the</strong> “three main <strong>Rapture</strong> passages” (LaHaye’s phrase)really teach that kind of complicated scenario? 14 Don’t <strong>the</strong>y simplydescribe a resurrection at <strong>the</strong> time of Jesus’ second coming?For example, <strong>the</strong> noted biblical scholar N. T. Wright, a memberof <strong>the</strong> evangelical wing of <strong>the</strong> Anglican church <strong>and</strong> nowbishop of Durham, discusses <strong>the</strong> description of Christ’s comingthat Paul provides in 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17. He argues thatPaul was using a mixed metaphor when describing Jesus’ returnto earth, adding: “Few in <strong>the</strong> U.K. hold <strong>the</strong> belief . . . that <strong>the</strong>rewill be a literal ‘rapture” in which believers will be snatched upto heaven, leaving empty cars crashing on freeways.” 15 Hisremark illustrates that widespread acceptance of a rapture maybe culturally limited to North America.Gary DeMar, author of an extensive biblical critique of TimLaHaye’s <strong>the</strong>ology, also is convinced that <strong>the</strong>re is no rapture in<strong>the</strong> Bible. He asserts: “LaHaye takes Bible passages that refer to<strong>the</strong> general resurrection <strong>and</strong> applies <strong>the</strong>m to a pretrib [pretribulation]rapture of <strong>the</strong> church. The resurrection of <strong>the</strong> dead, not<strong>the</strong> rapture of <strong>the</strong> church, is <strong>the</strong> hope of <strong>the</strong> church.” 16 Referringfur<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> issue of biblical support, Demar says: “There is nosingle verse or group of verses that specifically describes any of<strong>the</strong>se . . . <strong>Rapture</strong> positions. In terms of pretribulationsim, sincethat’s <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rapture</strong> position advocated by LaHaye, we shouldexpect to find at least one verse that describes Jesus coming forHis church to take Christians to heaven prior to a seven-yearperiod of tribulation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n Jesus returning with His churchrobin-bobin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!