1GyAp2x

Introduction 19Arjun Appadurai and Carol Breckenridge suggest the term “publicculture” as an alternative to terms such as “popular culture” or “massculture” to link popular-culture engagement to practices of participationin the public sphere. They see public culture studies as a way of understanding“the space between domestic life and the nation-state—wheredifferent social groups (classes, ethnic groups, genders) constitute theiridentities by their experience of mass-culture mediated forms in relationto the practices of everyday life” (Appadurai and Breckenridge 1995, 4–5).We draw from this framing and situate it within this current historicalmoment, where we are seeing public culture, as it is experienced by agrowing number of U.S. teens, migrating to digitally networked forms. Inthis context, youth are participating in publics constituted in part by thenation-state, and also by commercial media environments that are alongthe lines of the “consumer citizenship” that Banet-Weiser (2007) has theorized.We use the term “networked publics” to reference the forms ofparticipation in public culture that is the focus of our work. The growingavailability of digital media-production tools, combined with online networksthat traffic in rich media, is creating convergence between massmedia and online communication (Benkler 2006; Ito 2008a; Jenkins 2006;Shirky 2008; Varnelis 2008). Rather than conceptualize everyday mediaengagement as “consumption” by “audiences,” the term “networkedpublics” foregrounds the active participation of a distributed social networkin the production and circulation of culture and knowledge. The growingsalience of networked publics in young people’s daily lives is part ofim portant changes in what constitutes the relevant social groups andpublics that structure young people’s learning and identity.This book delves into the details of everyday youth participation innetworked publics and into the ways in which parents and educators workto shape these engagements. As danah boyd discusses in her analysis ofparticipation on MySpace, networked publics differ from traditional teenpublics (such as the mall or the school) in some important ways. Unlikeunmediated publics, networked publics are characterized by their persistence,searchability, replicability, and invisible audiences (boyd 2007).With friendship-driven practices, youth online activity largely replicatestheir existing practices of hanging out and communicating with friends,but these characteristics of networked publics do create new kinds ofopportunities for youth to develop their public identities, connect, and