40rupees must, in course of time, fall to their intrinsic worth comparedAvitli the sicca of the nineteenth sun, as they will produceno more in the mint, and to which they will necessarily be broughtto be converted into siccas, as they will be nowhere passable orin demand as coin, from being nowhere a measure of value. Therules by which the gold coin has been regulated have been productiveof evils, similar to those which have prevailed with regardto the silver coin. Under the native administration, and until theyear 1766 the gold mohur was not considered as a legal tender ofpayment in any public or private transaction, nor was the numberof rupees for which it was to pass current ever fixed by theGovernment. It was struck for the convenience of individuals, andthe value of it in the markets fluctuated like other commodities,silver being the metal which was the general measure of valuethroughout the country. <strong>In</strong> the year 1766, the value of the goldcoin with respect to the silver was first fixed, and the former coindeclared a legal tender of payment. A. gold mohur was struck andordered to pass for fourteen sicca rupees. But as this coin1-(calculating according to the relative value of the two metals) was muchbelow the worth of the silver in the number of rupees for which itwas ordered to pass, it was found impossible to render it current,and it was accordingly called in, and a new gold rnohur, beingthat now current, was issued in 1769, which was directed to passas a legal tender of payment for sixteen sicca rupees. The intrinsicworth of this coin was estimated to be equal to the nominalvalue of it, or as nearly so as was deemed necessary to render itcurrent at the prescribed rate. But whether owing to the effectof the orders for the introduction of the over-rated gold coin of1766, the considerable value of the new gold mohur, and the wantof divisions of it, so as to render the coin calculated for the dealingsof the lower orders of the people in the interior part of thecountry, or other causes, the currency of it has been almost entirelyconfined to Calcutta, where it has been received and paid inall public and private payments at the fixed value of sixteen siccarupees. But this partial currency of the gold coin has enabled themoney-changers to practice an abuse upon the public and individualsof a nature similar to that which has prevailed regardingthe silver The means which appear best calculated to renderthe gold mohur generally current are to declare it receivable atall the public treasuries and in all public payments throughoutthe provinces, at the rate of sixteen sicca rupees to make it a ; legaltender ofpayment in private transactions to coin a;great proportionof halves and quarters and; lastly, to impose a duty uponall gold bullion sent to the mint to be coined so as to prevent toolarge a proportion of gold being introduced into circulation, bydiminishing, in some degree, the advantage at present derivedfrom the importation of it in preference to silver."To guard, as far as possible, against the counterfeiting, clipping,drilling, filing, defacing, or debasing the coin, it was enactedoy Section VII of Eegulation XXXV that " the edges of both thegold and silver coin are to be milled, and the dies are to be madeof the same size as the coin, so that the whole of the impressionmay appear upon the surface of it."
41As regards the coins of the nineteenth sun, which are repeatedlylreferred to in the above Regulation, Marsdeu says in the courseof his observations on a gold mohur, bearing on the obverse thedate 1197 (A.D. 1781-2), and on the reverse the inscription" struck at Moorshidabdd in the 19th year of the auspicious reign."" The legend adopted by Shah Alum at his succession is continuedon this mulir and the subsequent coinage in gold and silver,professing to be from the mint of Murshidabad, the moderncapital of the province of Bengal, but which, in fact, were executedat Calcutta, under the immediate authority of the East <strong>In</strong>diaCompany's Government. So early, indeed, as the year 1757, wefind a treaty with the Nabob Scrajdh ed-daula/i, in which it is stipulatedthat sikkas (rupihs) may be coined at Allenagore (AUahnagar?) or Calcutta, in the same manner as at Hurshidabad. Asimilar article appears in a treaty with Jafir Ali Khan in 1763,and with Najim ed-daulah in 1764 but all these were5supersededby the treaty of 1765, negociated by Lord Clive, then Governor ofBengal, in which a grant is made to the Company by Shah Alum,of the Dewani or plenary collection and administration of therevenues of that province. This muhr of 1196, as well as thenearly similar pieces of 1197, 1198, and 12<strong>01</strong> are, in point ofworkmanship, respectable coins, and exceed in weight, by about20 grains, the ancient gold of the empire but present a fresh;instance of that total disregard of the consistency and fidelity ofdates, which has been already noticed as marking the money struckunder European control for ; although actually the coinage ofthe twenty-third, twenty -fourth, and twenty-eighth years of themonarch's reign, as indicated by the corresponding years of thehc/rfi/t, they all express uniformly the nineteenth year. Thisanachronism, repeated through every successive coinage of thesame mint, has confounded the investigations of writers on <strong>In</strong>diannumismatics, and cannot be too strongly reprobated." This" anachronism," or " glaring absurdity," as it is also called byMarsden, is referred to by T. C. Tyschen 2 in the following words:" Mira est in his numis annorum imperil cum annis Hegirsediscordia : etenim cum Schah Alem regnuminierit a 1175, annusejus 19 erat Heg 1193. Contra annus Heg 1202 esset imperii 28a 1203, imp. 29 ....... Videntur Angli typis veteribus avers89partis aliquando uti, de annis miseri imperatoris recte numerandisparum curiosi. Further Mr. Stanley Lane-Poole says in the<strong>In</strong>troduction to the <strong>Coins</strong> of the Sultans of Dehli in the British<strong>Mus</strong>eum 3 ": Daulat Khan Lodi and Khizr Khan, in the generalconfusion which accompanied the invasion of <strong>In</strong>dia by Timur,preferred rather to trade upon the traditional credit of theirpredecessors than to make any demands upon the people's trust intheir personal solvency, and thus issued their coins in the name ofFiroz III or Muhammad III, the mints of which issues cannot beheld to offer a very trustworthy evidence of the extent of theirstriker's dominion, which, however, we know from other sources1Numismat. Orient., 1825, part ii, p. 688.2De Numig <strong>In</strong>dicis Comment, p.192. 1884, p. xviiḞ
- Page 9:
GOVEENMENT CENTEAL MUSEUM,MADRAS.CO
- Page 13:
Pag*PREFACE . . . . . . , . . . . .
- Page 16 and 17:
8 INTRODUCTION'.or restored in the
- Page 18:
10 INTRODUCTION.owu initial for the
- Page 21 and 22:
INTRODUCTION. 13The silver coins st
- Page 23 and 24:
INTRODUCTION. 15His silver coinage
- Page 25 and 26:
TABLE OF THE MYSORE RAJAHS. 17TABLE
- Page 27 and 28:
ItANTEROY FANAM. 19GOLD :PRIOR TO M
- Page 29 and 30:
!toTIPPOO SULTAN : GOLD COIN*.21GOL
- Page 31 and 32:
GOLD :TIPPOO SULTAN: GOLD COINS.MUH
- Page 33 and 34:
TIPPOO SULTAN :SILVER COINS.25SILVE
- Page 35 and 36:
'Muhammad.T1PPOO SULTAN : SILVER CO
- Page 37 and 38:
KRISHNA RAJA WODEYAR : SILVER COINS
- Page 39 and 40:
COPPER COINS WITH CHEQUERED REVERSE
- Page 41 and 42:
TIPPOO SULTAN :COPPER COINS.33COPPE
- Page 43 and 44:
TIPPOO SULTAN : COPPER COINS. 35COP
- Page 45 and 46:
COPPER : MUHAMMADANTIPPOO SULTAN :
- Page 47 and 48:
TIPPOO SULTAN : COPPER COINS. 39COP
- Page 49 and 50:
TIPPOO SULTAN : COPPER COINS.41COPP
- Page 51 and 52:
TIPPOO SULTAN : COPPER COINS.43COPP
- Page 53 and 54:
KRISHNA RAJA WODEYAR :COPPER COINS.
- Page 55 and 56:
KRISHNA RAJA WODEYAR :COPPER COINS.
- Page 57 and 58:
MintDate.KRISHNA RJiJA WODEYAR : CO
- Page 59 and 60:
(51)ADDENDA.No.
- Page 61 and 62:
SUPPLEMENT.NOTE BY MARSDEN ON THE A
- Page 63:
SUPPLEMENT. 55it becomes necessary
- Page 66 and 67:
58 INDEX OF MLN !>Mint.
- Page 68 and 69:
60 INDEX OF MINTS.Mint.
- Page 70 and 71:
62 INDEX OF PLATES.PLATE III.K"ame
- Page 72 and 73:
64 INDEX OF PLATES.PLATE VII.Name o
- Page 74 and 75:
66 INDEX OF PLATES,PLATE XI.Name of
- Page 77:
PL ATE
- Page 81:
T E.)V.~F. S. COIN?
- Page 85:
. .M-E.X;BARHE.N.L!7HOG; MADRAS.CO?
- Page 89:
PLATEVX-. BARRtN .LITHOG,.MA.DRA5,I
- Page 93:
PLATEXilCOPPERCOINS
- Page 97:
GOVERNMENT CENTRAL MUSEUM,MADRAS.CO
- Page 101:
I- -ROMAN COINS.
- Page 104 and 105:
8 ROMAN rorxs.Did Attyitxti Fi/ius
- Page 106 and 107:
10 KOMAN COINS.One of the emperors
- Page 108 and 109:
'12 JIOMA.N COINS.coins, however, s
- Page 110 and 111:
14 ROMAN COINS.Reverse. DIWS. AVGVS
- Page 112 and 113:
16 ROMAN (OINS.24. Obcerse. XKROXI.
- Page 114 and 115:
18 ROMAN COINS.No. IV. Coin of Caiu
- Page 116 and 117:
ROM \.\ < )f\s.No. XX 21 .Coin of N
- Page 118 and 119:
2 ROMAN COINS.CAESAR. AVOVSTVS. Div
- Page 120 and 121:
24 ROMAN COINS.other boars on the o
- Page 122 and 123:
26 ROMAN
- Page 124 and 125:
28 ROMANthe kind to have succeeded
- Page 126 and 127:
{Triumphal30 ROM.A.N COINS.No. Weig
- Page 128 and 129:
ROMAN COINSNo. Weight. Obvcrsi). Re
- Page 130 and 131:
34 TIOMAN COINS.No. Weight. Obverse
- Page 132 and 133:
36 ROMAN COINS.No.
- Page 134 and 135:
'38 ROMAN" COINS.No. Wei -lit. Obve
- Page 136 and 137:
40 ROMAN COINS.No.
- Page 138 and 139:
ROMAN CODsS.No. Weight. Obverse. Re
- Page 140 and 141:
44 ROMAN COINS.Inscription.Remarks.
- Page 142 and 143:
46 ROMAN COINS.ADDENDUM.It isonly s
- Page 145:
PrintedINDOPORTUGUESE COINS.THE his
- Page 148 and 149:
52 PORTUGUESE COINS.No.
- Page 150 and 151:
54 PORTUGUESE COINS.No.
- Page 152 and 153:
56 PORTUGUESE COINS.No.
- Page 154 and 155:
58 PORTUGUESE COINS.No.
- Page 156 and 157:
60 PORTUGUESE COINS.No.
- Page 159:
HI-CEYLON COINS.
- Page 162 and 163:
66 CEYLON COINS.type on the obverse
- Page 165 and 166:
CEYLON COINS. 67possession of the B
- Page 167 and 168:
CEYLON COINS. 69legend VICTORIA. D.
- Page 169 and 170:
No.CEYLON COINS. 71
- Page 171 and 172:
No.CEYLON COINS. 73
- Page 175:
GOVERNMENT CENTRAL MUSEUM,MADRAS.CO
- Page 179 and 180:
No.COINS OF THE SULTANS OF DEHLI.
- Page 181 and 182: No. Thomas. British Museum.
- Page 183 and 184: Thomas. British Museum. fiodgers.NA
- Page 185 and 186: No.11No. Thomas. British Museum. Ro
- Page 187 and 188: No.13
- Page 189: 15Thomas. British Museum. Rodgers.S
- Page 193: PREFACE.IN the preparation of the p
- Page 197 and 198: HISTOEY OF THE COINAGE OF THETEEEIT
- Page 199 and 200: 1-4), though they are now usually c
- Page 201 and 202: 9from thence laden with sondry kind
- Page 203 and 204: 11place, leaving behind only one of
- Page 205 and 206: 13weigh 2 dwt. 4^ grs.M. Tavernier'
- Page 207 and 208: 15form that Moor in his Hindu Panth
- Page 209 and 210: 17rupees, pices, and budgrooks, l a
- Page 211 and 212: 19The following types of Anglo-Indi
- Page 213 and 214: 21a Phirwin iid, giving his authori
- Page 215 and 216: 23title of" The United Company of M
- Page 217 and 218: 25linguist) the memorable Firman or
- Page 219 and 220: 27obtain at Fort St. George. In oth
- Page 221 and 222: 2911. Lead double Pice.Obverse. The
- Page 223 and 224: 31make use of after the first trial
- Page 225 and 226: with33French General Lally and inve
- Page 227 and 228: 35On the 12th of August 1765, the E
- Page 229 and 230: 37The coin of gold of the country i
- Page 231: 39became the established currency o
- Page 235 and 236: 43" (3) The new sikka rupee, struck
- Page 237 and 238: 45" The coinage of rupees, half rup
- Page 239 and 240: 47Venetions or Shanar Cash.Alkoss C
- Page 241 and 242: 49OSverseS ^JlcX.ReverseIn a letter
- Page 243 and 244: 51" the Board have referred particu
- Page 245 and 246: 53" The copper coinage in circulati
- Page 247 and 248: 55ENGLISH EAST INDIA COMPANY, and o
- Page 249 and 250: 57motto AUSP. BEGIS. & s. ANGLiAE,
- Page 251 and 252: 59of 2 per cent, to cover the charg
- Page 253 and 254: 61In section ii of the same regulat
- Page 255 and 256: 63changing the form of the bullion
- Page 257 and 258: 65117. Tliis would doubtless be an
- Page 259 and 260: 67rupee respectively shall be recei
- Page 261 and 262: 69of tenders made to this mint, viz
- Page 263 and 264: 71at a small expense, and been made
- Page 265 and 266: 73struck from matrices engraved by
- Page 267: 75IV. The copper coins so coined sh
- Page 271 and 272: 79ENGLISH EAST INDIA COMPANY.Fo. Da
- Page 273 and 274: 81No. Date. Obverse. Reverse.A. COI
- Page 275 and 276: 83Date. Obverse. Reverse.A. COINS W
- Page 277 and 278: 85No. Date. Obverse. Reverse.A. COI
- Page 279 and 280: 87No.Date.Obverse. Reverse .A. COIN
- Page 281 and 282: 89No. Date. Obverse. Reverse.A. COI
- Page 283 and 284:
No.91
- Page 285 and 286:
93Date. Obverse. Reverse.A. COINS W
- Page 287 and 288:
95No.Date.
- Page 289 and 290:
97Mint : Date. Obverse. Reverse.B.
- Page 291 and 292:
Date.99Mint :Obverse. Reverse.B. CO
- Page 293 and 294:
101Mint : Date. Obverse. Reverse.Su
- Page 295 and 296:
No.103
- Page 297 and 298:
No.105
- Page 299 and 300:
107No. Obverse. Reverse.C. COINS WI
- Page 301 and 302:
109Obverse.Reverse.C. COINS WITHOUT
- Page 303 and 304:
InscriptionIllNo.Obverse.Reverse.C.
- Page 305 and 306:
113No. Obverse. Reverse.C. COINS WI
- Page 307 and 308:
116No. Obverse. Reverse.C. COINS WI
- Page 309 and 310:
1(H7 )INDEX TO PLATES.PLATE I.Fig.
- Page 311 and 312:
INDEX TO PLATES. 119PLATE VII.Fig.
- Page 313 and 314:
INDEX TO PLATES. 121PLATE XIII.Fig.
- Page 315:
INDEX TO PLATES.123PLATE XX.Fig.
- Page 319:
Plate.II.
- Page 323:
Plate. IV
- Page 327:
Plate. VI.
- Page 331:
Plate.VUL
- Page 337:
10Plate .XL
- Page 341:
Plate XUi.
- Page 345:
Plate XV.
- Page 351:
PJateJM.
- Page 355 and 356:
PkteM
- Page 361:
.MAR3 0)971CJ Madras. Government Mu