10.10.2015 Views

Carbohydrates and Health

1OqQDo3

1OqQDo3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 9.2: Inconsistent evidence - r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trials<br />

Measure<br />

Eating motivation<br />

Exposure<br />

non-digestible oligosaccharides<br />

Summary <strong>and</strong> Conclusions<br />

9.80 This assessment is based on r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trials investigating the<br />

relationship between supplements of resistant starch, oligosaccharide or inulin<br />

<strong>and</strong> cardio-metabolic <strong>and</strong> colo-rectal outcomes. There were no prospective<br />

cohort studies investigating the relationship between oligosaccharides <strong>and</strong> the<br />

relevant health/disease outcomes. There was no relevant evidence, which met<br />

the inclusion criteria for this report, identified on non-digestible oligosaccharides,<br />

inulin or resistant starch intake in relation to oral health outcomes.<br />

9.81 Nearly all the trials investigating non-digestible oligosaccharides supplemented<br />

subjects’ diets with arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide, fructo-oligosaccharide, galactooligosaccharide<br />

or inulin. The data are too limited to draw conclusions on other<br />

non-digestible oligosaccharides that may be found naturally in foods or are<br />

produced using industrial processes. The non-digestible oligosaccharides <strong>and</strong> inulin<br />

used in trials often differ in their degree of polymerisation, but it is unclear from<br />

the data whether these differences have an impact on the outcomes investigated.<br />

The doses required for some of the observed effects may vary depending on the<br />

specific oligosaccharide preparation. Different enzymatic preparations can result<br />

in different molecular structures which may affect functionality.<br />

9.82 R<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trials that supplemented subjects’ diets with nondigestible<br />

oligosaccharides or inulin indicate a beneficial effect on fasting LDLcholesterol<br />

concentration, but no effect is indicated on fasting total cholesterol,<br />

HDL-cholesterol or triacylglycerol concentration. Trials indicate no effect of<br />

non-digestible oligosaccharide supplementation on fasting glucose, fasting<br />

insulin concentration or energy intake. The trials do indicate that non-digestible<br />

oligosaccharides cause an increase in faecal weight <strong>and</strong> effect faecal bacterial<br />

content, including increases in the content of Bifidobacterium spp., but have no<br />

effect on faecal short chain fatty acid content. Trials indicate that non-digestible<br />

oligosaccharides or inulin supplementation increases the fractional absorption of<br />

calcium in children <strong>and</strong> adolescents, but not in adults.<br />

9.83 R<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trials that supplemented subjects’ diets with resistant<br />

starch indicate no effect of resistant starch on energy intake. Resistant starch<br />

supplementation (types 1, 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 analysed together) is shown to cause an<br />

increase in faecal weight, has no effect on faecal bacterial content, but modifies<br />

faecal short chain fatty acid content, with an increase in the concentration or<br />

proportion of butyrate <strong>and</strong> a lowering of pH. A limited number of trials indicate<br />

little effect of resistant starch type 4 on these faecal parameters.<br />

9.84 The supplement doses of resistant starch, non-digestible oligosaccharide or inulin<br />

at which the effects described above become apparent is above levels currently<br />

consumed in typical diets in the UK, but recent <strong>and</strong> future developments of novel<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!