10.10.2015 Views

Carbohydrates and Health

1OqQDo3

1OqQDo3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cellulose<br />

Faecal weight <strong>and</strong> intestinal transit time<br />

A5.13 Three r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trials were identified that presented evidence on<br />

cellulose in relation to faecal weight <strong>and</strong> intestinal transit times (Spiller et al.,<br />

1980; Hillman et al., 1983; Behall et al., 1987). The transit time methodologies were<br />

insufficiently comparable to allow a meta-analysis to be performed. No further<br />

trials were identified in the update search (Colo-rectal health review).<br />

A5.14 An effect of cellulose (14-23g/day) is demonstrated on increasing faecal weight<br />

in all trials. Two trials report an effect of cellulose on reducing intestinal transit<br />

time, but one trial reports no significant effect in subjects with a relatively fast<br />

initial intestinal transit time (Behall et al., 1987). The effect sizes are comparable<br />

to wheat fibre.<br />

Cellulose <strong>and</strong> faecal weight <strong>and</strong> intestinal transit time<br />

• Effect<br />

• Moderate evidence<br />

• The direction of the effect demonstrates consumption of cellulose is potentially<br />

beneficial to health<br />

• The effect is potentially biologically relevant, but demonstrated at concentration of<br />

intake achieved through supplementation<br />

Mixed isolated fibres<br />

Isolated gums <strong>and</strong> gelling agents<br />

Blood Pressure<br />

A5.15 Seven r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trials were identified that presented evidence on<br />

isolated gums <strong>and</strong> gelling agents in relation to blood pressure (Bell et al., 1990;<br />

L<strong>and</strong>in et al., 1992; Pasman et al., 1997a; Marett & Slavin, 2004; Lehtimaki et al.,<br />

2005; Schwab et al., 2006; Wood et al., 2007). Two trials could not be included<br />

in a meta-analysis as they did not report the necessary data (Pasman et al., 1997a;<br />

Marett & Slavin, 2004) (Cardio-metabolic review, incident hypertension <strong>and</strong> blood<br />

pressure chapter). The trials included in the analysis supplemented subjects’ diets<br />

with either pectin, guar gum, chitosan, or konjac mannan.<br />

A5.16 No significant effect is demonstrated for various isolated gums <strong>and</strong> gelling agent<br />

supplements on systolic blood pressure (-0.82mmHg, 95% CI -5.2, 3.6; p=0.72).<br />

A5.17 No consistent effect is demonstrated for various isolated gums <strong>and</strong> gelling agent<br />

supplements on diastolic blood pressure on the forest plot. Furthermore the<br />

heterogeneity was above the pre-specified cut-off of 75% (I 2 =81%) therefore, the<br />

pooled estimate has not been reported.<br />

A5.18 The two trials that are not included in the meta-analysis report no significant<br />

effect of either guar gum or arabino-galactans on blood pressure (Pasman et al.,<br />

1997a; Marett & Slavin, 2004).<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!