10.01.2016 Views

Deliver High Quality High Performance HEVC via Intel® Media Server Studio

1mz2mWD

1mz2mWD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5B Relative <strong>Quality</strong> Evaluation Results on HD1080p test set for <strong>Intel®</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> Software Codec<br />

in TU1, TU4, and TU7 modes with respect to MPEG <strong>HEVC</strong> HM14 Codec<br />

HD1080p Test<br />

Sequence<br />

TU1 BD rate, %age TU4 BD rate, %age TU7 BD rate, %age<br />

Y U V Y U V Y U V<br />

1 Park_joy 1.13 5.41 1.63 13.42 16.96 27.48 26.40 32.88 42.50<br />

2 Ducks_take_off 0.55 2.78 7.08 10.49 -3.20 21.87 20.40 11.05 38.23<br />

3 CrowdRun 1.03 3.32 2.83 16.51 22.24 23.07 35.12 48.29 50.21<br />

4 TouchDownPass 0.83 -5.35 -4.83 19.31 17.53 17.80 38.34 53.74 50.80<br />

5 BQTerrace 4.06 -14.83 -22.44 26.64 24.92 31.83 49.85 41.01 61.06<br />

6 ParkScene 2.69 -6.04 -7.99 17.45 21.24 19.67 33.31 40.70 36.60<br />

Average 1.71 -2.45 -3.96 17.30 16.61 23.62 33.90 37.94 46.57<br />

From Table 5A and 5B we can see that results on encoding server configuration used for E5 for all three TU’s<br />

provide identical high video quality to the configuration tested earlier for i7 processor 4770K, 4-core used for<br />

all other tests in this white paper.<br />

Encoder <strong>Quality</strong> vs <strong>Performance</strong> Tradeoff for TU Modes for Computational<br />

Scalability Tests for 4:2:0 8-bit<br />

Next, we perform performance analysis tests on the aforementioned E5 server configuration. Fig. 11A shows<br />

results of this measurement which when compared to earlier tests on i7 4770k configuration for TU1 quality<br />

demonstrates a speedup factor of 3.5x for UHD content and 2.1x for HD content. This also shows the<br />

benefits of high throughput server configuration for higher resolution (UHD) content. The E5 server<br />

configuration also shows much reduced load on the cores, allowing additional similar encodes to run on the<br />

server - this item is discussed further a little later <strong>via</strong> Figure 12.<br />

Encoding Speed (fps)<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Comparison of <strong>Media</strong><strong>Server</strong><strong>Studio</strong> TU1 Mode and HM14.0<br />

4.34 (289x)<br />

HD1080p<br />

1.39 (347x)<br />

0.015 0.004<br />

Resolution<br />

<strong>Media</strong><strong>Server</strong><strong>Studio</strong> TU1<br />

<strong>HEVC</strong> HM14.0<br />

UHD4K<br />

Figure 11A Average encoding speed comparison of <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU1 mode with HM14<br />

<strong>Deliver</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>Quality</strong>, <strong>High</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> <strong>via</strong> <strong>Intel®</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong><br />

37<br />

Next, Table 6A and 6B show encoding speed measurements for each sequence of UHD4K and HD1080p test sets.<br />

*Other names and brands may be claimed as property of others.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!