10.01.2016 Views

Deliver High Quality High Performance HEVC via Intel® Media Server Studio

1mz2mWD

1mz2mWD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Quality</strong> Evaluation Results for 4:2:0 10-bit Content<br />

Before discussing detailed BD rate differences of each <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU mode wrt HM14, we first<br />

establish the quality/bitrate tradeoff of HM 14 that will be used as reference.<br />

UHD1600p Test<br />

Sequence<br />

First, each video sequence of each test set (such as UHD1600p, HD1080p) is encoded using MPEG <strong>HEVC</strong><br />

HM14 Reference Encoder with each of 4 quantizers as specified in Tables 7A-7B. The overall PSNR<br />

(averaged over frames) for each test sequence for each Qp for each of luma (Y), and associated chroma<br />

components (U and V) is collected along with the generated coding bitrate. For instance, Tables 8A-8B<br />

show the luma PSNR (chroma PSNR is also collected but is not shown to keep tables manageable in size)<br />

and total bitrate for each test sequence for each of 4 Qps is collected and is used in curve fitting to<br />

generate a continuous RD curve for HM14 encoding of that test sequence.<br />

Next, <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> Software Encoder in each of its 3 main modes: TU1, TU4, and TU7 is<br />

utilized to perform encoding of each test sequence with each of 4 quantizers (of Table 7A-7B) used in HM<br />

14 encoding, and PSNRs of Y, U, and V, and total bitrates are collected for each test.<br />

Table 8A PSNR Y, and Total Bitrate for each of 4 QPs by HM 14 Codec on 4:2:0 10-bit UHD1600p Test set<br />

Qp1 PSNR, Bitrate, Qp2 PSNR, Bitrate, Qp3 PSNR, Bitrate, Qp4 PSNR, Bitrate,<br />

dB Y kbps dB Y kbps dB Y kbps dB Y kbps<br />

1 Nebuta_Festival 30.77 48676.1 28.96 19640.4 28.11 8011.4 27.55 3678.2<br />

2 SteamLocomotive 41.53 22431.0 40.04 5523.4 38.84 2232.8 37.07 1066.4<br />

3 ReadySetGo 41.78 24443.7 40.04 11730.2 37.80 6343.4 35.31 3663.6<br />

HD1080p Test<br />

Sequence<br />

Table 8B PSNR Y, and Total Bitrate for each of 4 QPs by HM 14 Codec on 4:2:0 10-bit HD1080p Test set<br />

Qp1 PSNR, Bitrate, Qp2 PSNR, Bitrate, Qp3 PSNR, Bitrate, Qp4 PSNR, Bitrate,<br />

dB Y kbps dB Y kbps dB, Y kbps dB, Y kbps<br />

1 CrowdRun 35.13 25614.2 32.62 13979.3 30.24 7652.9 28.13 4301.7<br />

2 ParkScene 39.59 6432.6 37.98 3467.1 36.37 2064.3 34.73 1195.5<br />

3 Seeking 37.29 40340.7 34.92 12963.8 32.60 5528.0 30.20 2556.7<br />

For <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> codec in each encoding mode, the 4 collected bitrates and corresponding 4<br />

PSNRs (each corresponding to one Qp) are used in curve fitting to generate a continuous RD curve for<br />

each encoding mode. Further, for each test sequence and for each <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU mode, the<br />

corresponding <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> RD curve is compared to HM14 RD curve and a BD rate percentage is<br />

computed that reflects the difference in quality between specific <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU mode with<br />

respect to HM14 reference. The BD rate provides a measure of departure of <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU<br />

mode’s quality in percentage bits with respect to the HM14 reference.<br />

<strong>Deliver</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>Quality</strong>, <strong>High</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> <strong>via</strong> <strong>Intel®</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong><br />

Table 8A-8B show the measured BD rate percentage bitrate for each of luma and chroma components for<br />

each test sequence of each test set of Table 7A-7B for each of 3 TU modes being evaluated. Fig. 14A1-14B2<br />

compares the RD characteristics of two codecs for each test set for TU1 and TU4 modes where the<br />

difference in quality is the highest and the lowest wrt HM14 reference.<br />

43<br />

*Other names and brands may be claimed as property of others.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!