10.01.2016 Views

Deliver High Quality High Performance HEVC via Intel® Media Server Studio

1mz2mWD

1mz2mWD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deliver</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>Quality</strong>, <strong>High</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> <strong>via</strong> <strong>Intel®</strong> <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong><br />

PSNR (dB)<br />

Figure 17B1 RD results of 4:2:2 8-bit HD720p scenes with the biggest and the smallest quality difference<br />

wrt HM14 for <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU1 mode<br />

Table 13B also shows that on 4:2:2 8-bit 720p test set, <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> Codec in TU4 mode with<br />

respect to HM14 reference, results in the biggest luma BD rate percentage difference on CrowdRun<br />

sequence and the smallest BD rate percentage difference for luma on Ducks_take_off sequence; the<br />

corresponding comparison curves for TU4 for the two cases are shown in Fig. 17B2.<br />

PSNR (dB)<br />

35<br />

34<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

35<br />

34<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

park_joy Y<br />

<strong>HEVC</strong> HM14.0<br />

<strong>Media</strong><strong>Server</strong><strong>Studio</strong> TU1<br />

0 10000 20000 30000<br />

BitRate (kbps)<br />

CrowdRun Y<br />

<strong>HEVC</strong> HM14.0<br />

<strong>Media</strong><strong>Server</strong><strong>Studio</strong> TU4<br />

0 5000 10000 15000 20000<br />

BitRate (kbps)<br />

PSNR (dB)<br />

PSNR (dB)<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

ducks_Take_off Y<br />

<strong>HEVC</strong> HM14.0<br />

<strong>Media</strong><strong>Server</strong><strong>Studio</strong> TU1<br />

0 5000 10000 15000 20000<br />

BitRate (kbps)<br />

ducks_Take_off Y<br />

<strong>HEVC</strong> HM14.0<br />

<strong>Media</strong><strong>Server</strong><strong>Studio</strong> TU4<br />

0 5000 10000 15000 20000<br />

BitRate (kbps)<br />

Figure 17B2 RD results of 4:2:2 8-bit 720p scenes with the biggest and the smallest quality difference wrt<br />

HM14 for <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong> TU4 mode<br />

To summarize, for 4:2:2 8-bit content the luma BD rate percentage bitrate difference of the <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong><br />

<strong>Studio</strong> <strong>HEVC</strong> in various modes with respect to an ideal (but slow) HM14 reference is as follows.<br />

56<br />

<br />

<br />

TU1 mode is only around 5% worse in BD rate as compared to HM14 on all test sets. This is highest<br />

quality mode in <strong>Media</strong> <strong>Server</strong> <strong>Studio</strong>.<br />

TU4 mode is 14.5 - 17% worse in BD rate as compared to HM14. As shown later, this mode provides an<br />

excellent tradeoff of quality vs speed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!