26.02.2016 Views

NATIONAL

1OzYqKR

1OzYqKR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEALTH BEHAVIOUR IN SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN:<br />

WHO COLLABORATIVE CROSS-<strong>NATIONAL</strong> STUDY (HBSC)<br />

2014 SURVEY IN SCOTLAND <strong>NATIONAL</strong> REPORT<br />

RESULTS<br />

PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS<br />

This chapter, the first of 15, gives a broad introduction and background to the study. Chapters 2 to 5 give a descriptive<br />

summary of social factors which are known to be associated with the health behaviour of young people: family life, the<br />

school environment, peer relations and neighbourhood environment. The following chapters focus on health and wellbeing<br />

indicators and health and risk behaviours. They present prevalence by age and gender and over time, where data<br />

are available. Most of the findings presented in this report are based on collapsing response options to questionnaire<br />

items.<br />

SAMPLE SIZE AND PRECISION OF ESTIMATES<br />

The basic national sample size within each age group was set at around 2000 students (before addition of boost areas), to<br />

allow more scope in subgroup analyses. The sample was selected using cluster sampling by school class, rather than simple<br />

random sampling. If cluster sampling methods are not accounted for in analysis, this can result in underestimation of<br />

standard errors, meaning that differences in prevalence may falsely be considered statistically significant. For example, for<br />

a prevalence of 19%, the standard error under the assumption of random sampling is 0.8%. The true complex standard error<br />

for this proportion, which takes account of the sample design (including clustering), is 1.2%, resulting in 95% confidence<br />

intervals of 16.4%-21.0%. This compares with a falsely narrow confidence interval of 17.0%-20.3% under the assumption of<br />

random sampling. All analyses in the report take account of sample design.<br />

DATA ANALYSES<br />

Design adjusted chi-square tests were carried out to assess statistical significance of differences between genders and age<br />

groups. All differences or changes reported are statistically significant unless otherwise stated. In this report, a 99% level of<br />

significance was used in the comparison of proportions. This more conservative measure was used in preference to 95%,<br />

as many tests of proportions were carried out. Analyses for age and gender took account of the effect of the survey design<br />

– stratification, clustering and weighting – on the precision of the estimates presented. The statistical package SPSS v21<br />

(IBM) was used for all design-adjusted analyses.<br />

Many of the items were collected over a number of surveys in Scotland and trends are reported for these. Where, for<br />

example, differences ‘between 1990 and 2014’ are described, the statistical test carried out was between the proportion<br />

in 1990 and the proportion in 2014. In some cases, comparisons were drawn between intervening years and these are<br />

highlighted in the text.<br />

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS<br />

Where in some cases, reported data appear not to add up to 100%, this is due to rounding error.<br />

NOTES:<br />

i http://www.cahru.org<br />

ii http://www.hbsc.org/<br />

iii Perth and Kinross Local Authority<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!