NATIONAL
1OzYqKR
1OzYqKR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HEALTH BEHAVIOUR IN SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN:<br />
WHO COLLABORATIVE CROSS-<strong>NATIONAL</strong> STUDY (HBSC)<br />
2014 SURVEY IN SCOTLAND <strong>NATIONAL</strong> REPORT<br />
RESULTS<br />
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS<br />
This chapter, the first of 15, gives a broad introduction and background to the study. Chapters 2 to 5 give a descriptive<br />
summary of social factors which are known to be associated with the health behaviour of young people: family life, the<br />
school environment, peer relations and neighbourhood environment. The following chapters focus on health and wellbeing<br />
indicators and health and risk behaviours. They present prevalence by age and gender and over time, where data<br />
are available. Most of the findings presented in this report are based on collapsing response options to questionnaire<br />
items.<br />
SAMPLE SIZE AND PRECISION OF ESTIMATES<br />
The basic national sample size within each age group was set at around 2000 students (before addition of boost areas), to<br />
allow more scope in subgroup analyses. The sample was selected using cluster sampling by school class, rather than simple<br />
random sampling. If cluster sampling methods are not accounted for in analysis, this can result in underestimation of<br />
standard errors, meaning that differences in prevalence may falsely be considered statistically significant. For example, for<br />
a prevalence of 19%, the standard error under the assumption of random sampling is 0.8%. The true complex standard error<br />
for this proportion, which takes account of the sample design (including clustering), is 1.2%, resulting in 95% confidence<br />
intervals of 16.4%-21.0%. This compares with a falsely narrow confidence interval of 17.0%-20.3% under the assumption of<br />
random sampling. All analyses in the report take account of sample design.<br />
DATA ANALYSES<br />
Design adjusted chi-square tests were carried out to assess statistical significance of differences between genders and age<br />
groups. All differences or changes reported are statistically significant unless otherwise stated. In this report, a 99% level of<br />
significance was used in the comparison of proportions. This more conservative measure was used in preference to 95%,<br />
as many tests of proportions were carried out. Analyses for age and gender took account of the effect of the survey design<br />
– stratification, clustering and weighting – on the precision of the estimates presented. The statistical package SPSS v21<br />
(IBM) was used for all design-adjusted analyses.<br />
Many of the items were collected over a number of surveys in Scotland and trends are reported for these. Where, for<br />
example, differences ‘between 1990 and 2014’ are described, the statistical test carried out was between the proportion<br />
in 1990 and the proportion in 2014. In some cases, comparisons were drawn between intervening years and these are<br />
highlighted in the text.<br />
INTRODUCTION AND METHODS<br />
Where in some cases, reported data appear not to add up to 100%, this is due to rounding error.<br />
NOTES:<br />
i http://www.cahru.org<br />
ii http://www.hbsc.org/<br />
iii Perth and Kinross Local Authority<br />
7