02.11.2016 Views

CORRUPTION

2f8yK1Y

2f8yK1Y

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interview with Dr. Robert Lawson<br />

Interview with Dr. Robert Lawson<br />

Southern Methodist University<br />

International Affairs Forum<br />

What drew you to a career in the study of<br />

economics?<br />

I toyed with the idea of studying political<br />

science with an eye toward politics or law, but<br />

the analytical rigor of the field drew me toward<br />

economics. Policy-making is frequently driven by<br />

emotions and serious mistakes happen often as<br />

a result. For example, the natural desire to help<br />

people who lose jobs to foreign competition leads<br />

to protectionist policies that make the nation<br />

poorer. The serious, cold-hearted calculus of<br />

costs and benefits embedded within economics<br />

offers a useful counterbalance to such policies.<br />

How have you applied your study of<br />

economics to the topic of human trafficking?<br />

This is a relatively new area of interest for me.<br />

I have published one study on the topic: “Is<br />

Human Trafficking the Dark Side of Economic<br />

Freedom?” in Defence and Peace Economics,<br />

coauthored with Lauren Heller (Berry College),<br />

Ryan Murphy (SMU), and Claudia Williamson<br />

(Mississippi State). The paper uses data on<br />

human trafficking at the country level to examine<br />

whether freer markets exacerbate or attenuate<br />

the incidence of human trafficking.<br />

What are some examples of economic<br />

phenomena that could result in problems like<br />

human trafficking?<br />

One argument is that developed countries<br />

demand cheap labor in order to produce<br />

the quantity and variety of goods wealthier<br />

consumers desire. In addition, developed nations<br />

tend to have more open borders, increasing<br />

the flow of goods and people, which may<br />

lower the costs to traffic. These arguments<br />

place the emphasis on the demand side of the<br />

market, blaming human trafficking on first-world<br />

consumers’ thirst for cheap goods. For some<br />

commentators, human trafficking is just another<br />

example of the exploitation associated with<br />

“neoliberal” markets everywhere.<br />

I am skeptical of this argument myself.<br />

An open market economy will certainly expand<br />

opportunities for exchange, increasing the overall<br />

scale of economic transactions. However, a more<br />

free economy with fewer labor market restrictions<br />

should decrease the incentive to traffic labor, as<br />

voluntary labor is readily available for purchase<br />

on the open market at a variety of prices.<br />

It is also well established that economically<br />

freer societies have greater potential for growth.<br />

Hence, economic freedom may decrease the<br />

quantity of human trafficking victims supplied.<br />

Does human trafficking occur more often<br />

in nations with underdeveloped or corrupt<br />

economies? If so, why do you think this<br />

happens?<br />

One of the purposes of our work was to<br />

distinguish the impact of development from<br />

economic freedom on human trafficking. This<br />

is difficult to do because more economically<br />

free countries also tend to be more developed.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!