CORRUPTION
2f8yK1Y
2f8yK1Y
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
International Affairs Forum Fall 2016<br />
Interview with Dr. Julio Bacio Terracino<br />
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)<br />
“Corruption” has been defined in a number of<br />
ways and, ‘on the ground’ the definition may<br />
vary from country to country. How would you<br />
define it?<br />
I would not dare to provide a definition.<br />
Corruption changes between societies and even<br />
within a society in different time periods. I value<br />
the approach taken with the UN Convention<br />
against Corruption, which in fact does not<br />
provide a definition, but lists all the possible acts<br />
that may be considered corruption. It is then<br />
up to countries to define, through their legal<br />
frameworks, what they consider corruption in<br />
their particular contexts.<br />
What roles and influences does the OECD<br />
provide regarding anti-corruption efforts?<br />
The OECD has been playing a major role in anticorruption<br />
efforts for more than two decades.<br />
The data and policy lessons developed by the<br />
OECD regularly inform national anti-corruption<br />
policies and practices. The OECD countries have<br />
developed a wealth of anti-corruption knowledge<br />
that they share among themselves, as well as<br />
with non-members to learn from each other and<br />
avoid reinventing the wheel and making similar<br />
mistakes. Most importantly, the OECD, with its<br />
more than 200 committees, has the capacity of<br />
linking anti-corruption discussions to other policy<br />
issues. This is how corruption takes place in the<br />
real world, not in an isolated way, but always in<br />
connection to a contract, a license, or in a sector<br />
such as health, etc. All this, in addition to the<br />
OECD convention on the bribery of foreign public<br />
officials in which the OECD literally changed the<br />
rules of the game.<br />
Would you briefly explain the correlation<br />
between corruption and human rights?<br />
On this front, there are some interesting<br />
discussions, such as whether there is a right<br />
to a corruption-free society, or whether we<br />
need an international court against so-called,<br />
grand corruption. I would not go this far, but the<br />
correlation between corruption and human rights<br />
is there and straightforward. Plain and simple,<br />
corruption has a detrimental impact on human<br />
rights. When funds for health or education<br />
disappear due to corrupt deals, the human right<br />
to health and education may be impaired. The<br />
same can be applied potentially to all human<br />
When funds for health or education disappear due to corrupt<br />
deals, the human right to health and education may be impaired.<br />
The same can be applied potentially to all human rights if<br />
countries do not ensure peoples’ enjoyment of human rights due<br />
to corruption.<br />
Fall 2016<br />
29