- Page 1 and 2:
1 EVALUATION Midterm Performance Ev
- Page 3 and 4:
MID-TERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLES Table 1: Relationships Betwe
- Page 7 and 8:
ANNEXES Annex I : Evaluation Statem
- Page 9 and 10:
OEECC PO PES PNP PNP-MG PPP SBS SDN
- Page 11 and 12:
B. To document the progress of impl
- Page 13 and 14:
o Fish visual census inside and out
- Page 15 and 16:
(5) Make the following EAFM benchma
- Page 17 and 18:
fish stocks? 3. To what extent and
- Page 19 and 20:
Final Outcomes Build Foundation Imp
- Page 21 and 22:
3. EVALUATION METHODS AND LIMITATIO
- Page 23 and 24:
3.2 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA Four MK
- Page 25 and 26:
3.4 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS The KII a
- Page 27 and 28:
(PNP-MG) and Bantay Dagat groups. D
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 3: Theory of Change and its
- Page 31 and 32:
Balayan Bay in 2014; and (ii) Fiber
- Page 33 and 34:
which has strong implications for f
- Page 35 and 36:
of the management body has temporar
- Page 37 and 38:
Their numbers increased to 19 LGU a
- Page 39 and 40:
about its enforcement for lack of a
- Page 41 and 42:
As noted earlier, the planned pilot
- Page 43 and 44:
these standard procedures, but cons
- Page 45 and 46:
scheme beyond the pilot stage. In s
- Page 47 and 48:
ANNEXES
- Page 49 and 50:
ANNEX I: EVALUATION STATEMENT OF WO
- Page 51 and 52:
EAFM nationwide. This approach to a
- Page 53 and 54: Implement Best Practices Tasks Deli
- Page 55 and 56: The evaluation will be carried out
- Page 57 and 58: IX. Evaluator’s Qualifications an
- Page 59 and 60: - Pictures and other visual materia
- Page 61 and 62: ANNEX II: SUMMARY OF DESK REVIEW AN
- Page 63 and 64: assessment. Tasks Deliverables 6. D
- Page 65 and 66: Name of Staff Virgilio Cabezon Dr.
- Page 67 and 68: Activities LOE Time line and TETRA
- Page 69 and 70: evaluability of the evaluation ques
- Page 71 and 72: • Focusing on operational concern
- Page 73 and 74: Approaches Quantitative Analysis Pa
- Page 75 and 76: organizations; and other implementi
- Page 77 and 78: 2) To what extent and under what co
- Page 79 and 80: FGD participants 2 FGD sessions per
- Page 81 and 82: Documents Reviewed Report (MTR)-02-
- Page 83 and 84: ANNEX II: WORKPLAN 4.0 WORKPLAN The
- Page 85 and 86: 4 Draft debriefing presentation 5 F
- Page 87 and 88: ANNEX III Data Collection Instrumen
- Page 89 and 90: 7. Has there been a decrease in the
- Page 91 and 92: Guide Questions: KII - MAO/Municipa
- Page 93 and 94: 23. Is monitoring system for coasta
- Page 95 and 96: 14. Are there established enterpris
- Page 97 and 98: FGD Guide Questions Informant’s N
- Page 99 and 100: 18. Was there a change in the numbe
- Page 101 and 102: provide in relation to your fishing
- Page 103: elated conflict, how is this resolv
- Page 107 and 108: ANNEX IV: THE 12 EVALUATION QUESTIO
- Page 109 and 110: Tons/km2 w/in MPA available standin
- Page 111 and 112: 2. To what extent and under what co
- Page 113 and 114: Reef fish biomass per MPA (relative
- Page 115 and 116: P/A for MFG Yes. This will monitor
- Page 117 and 118: value of confiscated materials Numb
- Page 119 and 120: Gaps/ Recommendations Ecofish must
- Page 121 and 122: Number in MFG Yes only enumerates t
- Page 123 and 124: TA hours by type Hrs Purchase order
- Page 125 and 126: 5. To what extent and under what co
- Page 127 and 128: many others. These things are part
- Page 129 and 130: 6. To what extent and under what co
- Page 131 and 132: etc.to make a sound conclusion, esp
- Page 133 and 134: 7. To what extent and under what co
- Page 135 and 136: 8. To what extent and under what co
- Page 137 and 138: Result area: LGU & stakeholders ado
- Page 139 and 140: fisheries management plan implement
- Page 141 and 142: management area established P/A Sea
- Page 143 and 144: Number Budget allotment Yes Yes thi
- Page 145 and 146: Supportive external mentors present
- Page 147 and 148: 12. To what extent and under what c
- Page 149 and 150: ANNEX V Findings on the 12 Evaluati
- Page 151 and 152: to EAFM outcomes? Currently there a
- Page 153 and 154: closure for pelagic fish in VIP MBK
- Page 155 and 156:
esources for coastal resources and
- Page 157 and 158:
ANNEX VI Sources of Information
- Page 159 and 160:
Province MKBA MPA/Municipality Grou
- Page 161 and 162:
Lemery San Teodoro, Mabini Sto. Tom
- Page 163 and 164:
Table D. Members of the MPE Team an
- Page 165 and 166:
FGD Results Table E. FGD results Ta
- Page 167 and 168:
Table E8. Was there decrease in the
- Page 169 and 170:
Total 29 100 28 100 23 100 31 100 1
- Page 171 and 172:
ANNEX VII EAFM Benchmark Results
- Page 173 and 174:
Government or NAMRIA Score 1 1 2 1
- Page 175 and 176:
Benchmark Table F3. Fisheries monit
- Page 177 and 178:
Benchmark Table F4. Fisheries law e
- Page 179 and 180:
partner LGUs Score 2 2 2 2 Benchmar
- Page 181 and 182:
egularly funded management activiti
- Page 183 and 184:
leverage financial and services sup
- Page 185 and 186:
Benchmark Table F8. Network of Mari
- Page 187 and 188:
Level 3: MPA network arrangements i
- Page 189 and 190:
Fisheries use zoning plan presented
- Page 191 and 192:
Level 3: Local constituencies for f
- Page 193 and 194:
Level 3: Multi-institutional collab
- Page 195 and 196:
monitored • Species-specific mana
- Page 197 and 198:
Level 2: Gear-specific management m
- Page 199 and 200:
Level 2: Mangrove management plan d
- Page 201 and 202:
(guardhouse, flashlights etc.) -Pub
- Page 203 and 204:
Level 3: Seagrass management sustai
- Page 205 and 206:
Level 2: Revenue-generating measure
- Page 207 and 208:
showing counterparting budget from
- Page 209 and 210:
Level 3: Coastal environment-friend