EVALUATION

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 EVALUATION PURPOSE AND QUESTIONS ..................................................................................................... 1 EVALUATION METHODS AND LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................. 2 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 3 1. EVALUATION PURPOSE AND QUESTIONS ................................................................................................. 7 1.1 EVALUATION PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 EVALUATION QUESTIONS .................................................................................................................. 7 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND SITES ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2 PROJECT KEY RESULTS AND DELIVERABLES ..................................................................................... 10 2.3 ALIGNMENT OF THE PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES TO GPH-US PRIORITIES ................... 11 3. EVALUATION METHODS AND LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................... 12 3.1 EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................. 12 3.2 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA ................................................................................................................ 14 3.3 DATA COLLECTION METHODS........................................................................................................ 14 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS .............................................................................................................. 16 3.5 LIMITATIONS OF THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................ 16 4. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 16 4.1 FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 33 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 35 ANNEXES........................................................................................................................................................... 38 ANNEX I: Statement of Work ......................................................................................................................... 39 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ABOUT THE MID-TERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ......................................................................... 1 2.1 Objectives of the Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Evaluation Deliverables .................................................................................................................... 2 2.4 Evaluation Team Assignments and Coordination Arrangements ............................................... 3 2.5 Period of Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 APPROACH TO THE FINAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 7 3.1 Evaluation Framework ...................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Approach and Methodology ......................................................................................................... 9
TABLES Table 1: Relationships Between Project Tasks, Deliverables and Key Results ..................................................................... 10 Table 2: Four MKBAs and the Municipalities and Barangays with MPAs Included in the MPE ......................................... 14 Table 3: Evaluability of the 12 Evaluation Questions ................................................................................................................... 17 Table 4: Achievement of Key Result A at Midterm ..................................................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Achievement of Key Result B at Midterm ...................................................................................................................... 22 Table 6: Achievement of Key Result C at Midterm ..................................................................................................................... 23 Table 7: Achievement of Key Result D at Midterm ..................................................................................................................... 25 Table 8: Achievement of Key Result E at Midterm ...................................................................................................................... 26 Table 9: Achievement of Key Result F at Midterm ...................................................................................................................... 26
Page 1 and 2: 1 EVALUATION Midterm Performance Ev
Page 3: MID-TERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF
Page 7 and 8: ANNEXES Annex I : Evaluation Statem
Page 9 and 10: OEECC PO PES PNP PNP-MG PPP SBS SDN
Page 11 and 12: B. To document the progress of impl
Page 13 and 14: o Fish visual census inside and out
Page 15 and 16: (5) Make the following EAFM benchma
Page 17 and 18: fish stocks? 3. To what extent and
Page 19 and 20: Final Outcomes Build Foundation Imp
Page 21 and 22: 3. EVALUATION METHODS AND LIMITATIO
Page 23 and 24: 3.2 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA Four MK
Page 25 and 26: 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS The KII a
Page 27 and 28: (PNP-MG) and Bantay Dagat groups. D
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3: Theory of Change and its
Page 31 and 32: Balayan Bay in 2014; and (ii) Fiber
Page 33 and 34: which has strong implications for f
Page 35 and 36: of the management body has temporar
Page 37 and 38: Their numbers increased to 19 LGU a
Page 39 and 40: about its enforcement for lack of a
Page 41 and 42: As noted earlier, the planned pilot
Page 43 and 44: these standard procedures, but cons
Page 45 and 46: scheme beyond the pilot stage. In s
Page 47 and 48: ANNEXES
Page 49 and 50: ANNEX I: EVALUATION STATEMENT OF WO
Page 51 and 52: EAFM nationwide. This approach to a
Page 53 and 54: Implement Best Practices Tasks Deli
Page 55 and 56:
The evaluation will be carried out
Page 57 and 58:
IX. Evaluator’s Qualifications an
Page 59 and 60:
- Pictures and other visual materia
Page 61 and 62:
ANNEX II: SUMMARY OF DESK REVIEW AN
Page 63 and 64:
assessment. Tasks Deliverables 6. D
Page 65 and 66:
Name of Staff Virgilio Cabezon Dr.
Page 67 and 68:
Activities LOE Time line and TETRA
Page 69 and 70:
evaluability of the evaluation ques
Page 71 and 72:
• Focusing on operational concern
Page 73 and 74:
Approaches Quantitative Analysis Pa
Page 75 and 76:
organizations; and other implementi
Page 77 and 78:
2) To what extent and under what co
Page 79 and 80:
FGD participants 2 FGD sessions per
Page 81 and 82:
Documents Reviewed Report (MTR)-02-
Page 83 and 84:
ANNEX II: WORKPLAN 4.0 WORKPLAN The
Page 85 and 86:
4 Draft debriefing presentation 5 F
Page 87 and 88:
ANNEX III Data Collection Instrumen
Page 89 and 90:
7. Has there been a decrease in the
Page 91 and 92:
Guide Questions: KII - MAO/Municipa
Page 93 and 94:
23. Is monitoring system for coasta
Page 95 and 96:
14. Are there established enterpris
Page 97 and 98:
FGD Guide Questions Informant’s N
Page 99 and 100:
18. Was there a change in the numbe
Page 101 and 102:
provide in relation to your fishing
Page 103 and 104:
elated conflict, how is this resolv
Page 105 and 106:
7. Draft/Legitimized Biophysical Mo
Page 107 and 108:
ANNEX IV: THE 12 EVALUATION QUESTIO
Page 109 and 110:
Tons/km2 w/in MPA available standin
Page 111 and 112:
2. To what extent and under what co
Page 113 and 114:
Reef fish biomass per MPA (relative
Page 115 and 116:
P/A for MFG Yes. This will monitor
Page 117 and 118:
value of confiscated materials Numb
Page 119 and 120:
Gaps/ Recommendations Ecofish must
Page 121 and 122:
Number in MFG Yes only enumerates t
Page 123 and 124:
TA hours by type Hrs Purchase order
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
many others. These things are part
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
etc.to make a sound conclusion, esp
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Result area: LGU & stakeholders ado
Page 139 and 140:
fisheries management plan implement
Page 141 and 142:
management area established P/A Sea
Page 143 and 144:
Number Budget allotment Yes Yes thi
Page 145 and 146:
Supportive external mentors present
Page 147 and 148:
12. To what extent and under what c
Page 149 and 150:
ANNEX V Findings on the 12 Evaluati
Page 151 and 152:
to EAFM outcomes? Currently there a
Page 153 and 154:
closure for pelagic fish in VIP MBK
Page 155 and 156:
esources for coastal resources and
Page 157 and 158:
ANNEX VI Sources of Information
Page 159 and 160:
Province MKBA MPA/Municipality Grou
Page 161 and 162:
Lemery San Teodoro, Mabini Sto. Tom
Page 163 and 164:
Table D. Members of the MPE Team an
Page 165 and 166:
FGD Results Table E. FGD results Ta
Page 167 and 168:
Table E8. Was there decrease in the
Page 169 and 170:
Total 29 100 28 100 23 100 31 100 1
Page 171 and 172:
ANNEX VII EAFM Benchmark Results
Page 173 and 174:
Government or NAMRIA Score 1 1 2 1
Page 175 and 176:
Benchmark Table F3. Fisheries monit
Page 177 and 178:
Benchmark Table F4. Fisheries law e
Page 179 and 180:
partner LGUs Score 2 2 2 2 Benchmar
Page 181 and 182:
egularly funded management activiti
Page 183 and 184:
leverage financial and services sup
Page 185 and 186:
Benchmark Table F8. Network of Mari
Page 187 and 188:
Level 3: MPA network arrangements i
Page 189 and 190:
Fisheries use zoning plan presented
Page 191 and 192:
Level 3: Local constituencies for f
Page 193 and 194:
Level 3: Multi-institutional collab
Page 195 and 196:
monitored • Species-specific mana
Page 197 and 198:
Level 2: Gear-specific management m
Page 199 and 200:
Level 2: Mangrove management plan d
Page 201 and 202:
(guardhouse, flashlights etc.) -Pub
Page 203 and 204:
Level 3: Seagrass management sustai
Page 205 and 206:
Level 2: Revenue-generating measure
Page 207 and 208:
showing counterparting budget from
Page 209 and 210:
Level 3: Coastal environment-friend
show all

EVALUATION

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?