EVALUATION
PA00MFK3
PA00MFK3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
these standard procedures, but considers the need to train all field staff involved in data<br />
gathering to have a common understanding of these procedures for accurate and consistent<br />
application.<br />
Objective B: Progress in Implementation<br />
As noted above, ECOFISH is on track in delivering its six key results. The achievement rates of<br />
these key results at midterm are significant, and most targets are likely to be achieved during<br />
the project life. Substantive works in the areas of livelihood and economic development to<br />
reduce fishing pressure and provide alternative income to fishing households are still in<br />
progress, such as, operating profitable enterprises, and revenue and sustainable financing<br />
schemes for LGUs, which the project needs to pay priority attention to in the remaining period<br />
of implementation.<br />
FishR and BoatR: ECOFISH Project catalyzed the national implementation of FishR and BoatR,<br />
which is now being continued under BFAR’s leadership. More importantly, FishR facilitates<br />
accounting of total fishery force of the country in relation to fish harvest, which has direct<br />
implications to a national support program for fishers and for policy making purposes. In<br />
support of FishR, the project has successfully introduced the TV White Space technology in<br />
partnership with DOST-ICT Office, BFAR, Bohol Provincial LGU, and Microsoft Philippines,<br />
leading to the prestigious P3 award received by ECOFISH Project in 2015.<br />
EAFM Benchmark Data: The benchmark data on EAFM verified by the project based on<br />
LGUs’ self-assessments showed a total of 19 of LOP target of 30 LGUs that achieved EAFM<br />
Level 2 status. However, field verifications showed that not all benchmark criteria were met to<br />
support some claims for scoring Level 2 status, such as, multi-institutional collaboration, gearspecific<br />
management, and revenue measures established, to cite a few. A more acceptable set of<br />
data qualifiers needs to be developed to apply the scoring system in a more consistent manner<br />
in support of LGUs’ claims of their achievements towards EAFM Level 2 status.<br />
Right Sizing: These 19 LGUs are on track to demonstrate the right sizing of fishing effort in<br />
line with the results chain indicated in the TOC. “Right sizing” was a coined by the project to<br />
promote the concept of finding the balance between the ecological capacities of MKBAs and<br />
fishing activities in the area. Presently, the project is developing a strategy to incorporate this<br />
concept as the core of the fisheries management plan for the inter-LGU collaboration. This<br />
particular work is in progress, as the project has just started this during the first two quarters<br />
in Year 3 of implementation. Furthermore, the project also needs to focus on the remaining 11<br />
LGUs to reach EAFM Level 2 status in order to meet its LOP target.<br />
Objective C: Challenges in Implementation<br />
While the basic assumptions regarding the extent and conditions under which ECOFISH<br />
Project interventions will achieve the key results related to the 10 percent increase in fish<br />
biomass are empirically feasible and practically oriented, the assumptions related to the 10%<br />
increase in the number of people with new or better employment are not definitive because<br />
substantial interventions are still underway at midterm. One of the remaining bottlenecks for<br />
34