EVALUATION

9. To what extent and under what conditions did LGUs move from fisheries management to EAFM?
Evaluability: YES
Result area: LGU moving from early fisheries management
Indicator/unit Appropriateness Data Availability Data Quality Analyses Overall Remarks
Other indicators not reported by Ecofish for this result area: NONE
Result area: LGUs implement EAFM as a result of ECOFISH facilitation (Benchmark levels achieved by LGUs)
Indicator/unit Appropriateness Data Availability Data Quality Analyses Overall Remarks
Ecosystem
boundaries
established
Yes
Yes. All records are
with the LGU/PLGU
and Ecofish.
Benchmarking is the
best approach for this
kind of evaluation.
P/A
Coastal marine
habitat monitoring
and management
planning
established
P/A
Fisheries
monitoring and
early fisheries
management
planning
established
P/A
Fisheries law
enforcement team
and program
established
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes. All of the indicators
presented are criteria to
establish/determine the
benchmark for the EAFM
status of each LGU. The
data has not been
verified if the claims of
the LGUs are correct
(e.g. presence of the
documents.
The analysis will be
based on the
established benchmark
made by Ecofish. To be
EAFM, each LGU
under the MKBA must
attain level 2 of at least
7 out of the 11 criteria.
Comprehensive Yes Yes. All records are Yes. All of the indicators The analysis will be Benchmarking is the
Annex 4 - 32