04.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

PA00MFK3

PA00MFK3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oats/gears to determine the appropriate right sizing of fishing effort<br />

according to the carrying capacity of fishing grounds in MKBAs. This<br />

information has also guided LGUs to enact and enforce fishing closure and<br />

zoning ordinances, tract and prevent fisheries law violators, and conserve<br />

fish resources. All LGUs in four MKBAs have also enacted ordinances that<br />

prohibited the use of destructive/illegal fishing gears, mostly within specific<br />

municipal boundaries. The establishment of MPAs by some LGUs also<br />

served as closed areas for fishing. Effective enforcement of right sizing,<br />

however, requires neighboring LGUs in each MKBA to jointly support this<br />

policy through the inter-LGU collaboration. At midterm, only LGUs in VIP<br />

MKBA have enacted and enforced species-specific management policy (i.e.,<br />

seasonal closure for pelagic fish) in Balayan Bay beyond politicoadministrative<br />

boundaries, which was made possible by the active inter-<br />

LGU collaboration. Essentially, the current approaches to regulate fishing<br />

effort in four MKBAs consisted of: monetary measures (fines or penalties),<br />

gear-regulating measures, closed areas and, to a certain extent, closed<br />

seasons.<br />

11. Did social capital and<br />

leadership<br />

catalyze/create<br />

movement of LGUs<br />

from startup fisheries<br />

management to EAFM?<br />

The few Municipal Mayors who were interviewed through KII have<br />

expressed the importance of right sizing policy and the potential for<br />

enacting the policy. However, they are also cautious about its enforcement<br />

for lack of additional knowledge and information, such as; the methods of<br />

reducing opportunism by segregating friendly and destructive fishing gears,<br />

encouraging all fishers to ensure compliance, and motivating sustained<br />

enforcement to reduce speculative fishing. All these information could be<br />

provided by the project’s ongoing studies if completed as scheduled.<br />

The project has measured social capital in terms of the presence of<br />

leaders/political will, local champions, and the ability to resolve conflicts<br />

among inter-LGUs. ECOFISH Project partnered with League of<br />

Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP) to support the training of newly<br />

elected Mayors (also called ONE-M Program) in eight MKBA sites. It<br />

supported the participation of five (5) current and past “champion” Mayors<br />

to mentor newly elected Mayor on environmental governance, particularly<br />

in coastal resources and fisheries management. ONE-M Program has aimed<br />

to bring together all concerned Municipal Mayors to build a network of<br />

cooperation and resource sharing in the form of a social capital that<br />

produces improved foundations for EAFM for the common good of all<br />

fishing households and communities. This program has been successful in<br />

producing “champion” Mayors involved in ECOFISH and/or FISH Project,<br />

or part of MOREFISH champions formed by FISH Project and LMP in the<br />

past. In supporting ONE-M Program, the project was able to reach out to<br />

other LGUs outside of eight MKBAs to share and promote best practices.<br />

Apart from training, these LGUs have gained additional knowledge and<br />

information through site-specific case studies that could enhance local<br />

policies and plans for EAFM.<br />

This social capital formation has shown initial positive effects. The inter-<br />

LGU collaboration in SN MKBA exhibited the best example of how joint<br />

action can lead to evolution of stronger strategic alliances and additional<br />

Annex 5 - 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!