04.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

PA00MFK3

PA00MFK3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

evaluability of the evaluation questions, standard scientific methodology, results chain of the TOC<br />

and collaboration or participation of LGUs, various stakeholders and institutional partners.<br />

In view of these objectives, we anchor our basic approaches and methodologies on three (3)<br />

essential factors:<br />

(1) ECOFISH documents and reports, (e.g. contract, work plan, M&E plan, status reports<br />

Baseline/Benchmark, operations plans, MPA related studies of the 8 sites; covenant with<br />

BFAR and partner LGUs, FISH Project documents, etc.);<br />

(2) The Results Chain-TOC framework; and<br />

(3) Development experiences of coastal and fishing communities in the country as<br />

manifested in previous project completion evaluation and assessment studies and<br />

baseline/benchmark surveys undertaken by the ECOFISH Project and the Department of<br />

Agriculture-BFAR in the 8 MKBAs.<br />

Moreover, the following matrix illustrates the conduct of the performance evaluation along the<br />

four axes: relevance (pertinence), process (effectiveness and efficiency), effects (achievement<br />

of the project’s specific objectives), and outcome (achievement of the program’s overall<br />

objective. Incorporating the levels of analysis and evaluation provides a guide to the SDS<br />

approach to the performance evaluation.<br />

Table 13. Matrix Illustrating the Conduct of the Performance Evaluation<br />

Relevance Process Effects Outcome<br />

Pertinence<br />

Design Evaluation<br />

Consistency<br />

Alignment<br />

Effectiveness<br />

Efficiency<br />

Process assessment<br />

Structure assessment<br />

Appropriation and<br />

participation (with<br />

respect to partners<br />

and beneficiaries)<br />

Institutional and<br />

capacity building<br />

Impact<br />

Objectives/results<br />

assessment<br />

Coverage and depth<br />

Institutional and<br />

capacity building<br />

Sustainability<br />

Design evaluation<br />

Objectives/results<br />

assessment<br />

Appropriation and<br />

participation (with<br />

respect to final<br />

beneficiaries)<br />

Exclusion/marginalization, gender equity, social-cultural factors, economic and technological<br />

trends, etc.<br />

3.2 Approach and Methodology<br />

The proposed performance evaluation design and framework embodies the following proven<br />

approaches in attaining the objectives of these consulting engagements.<br />

Consultative Approach. This framework entails the interplay of various stakeholders, thus, calling<br />

for clear understanding and consideration of various stakeholders’ cultures and interests in the<br />

performance evaluation and assessment process. We envision a work plan that leverages on the<br />

Annex 2 - 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!