EVALUATION
PA00MFK3
PA00MFK3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
evaluability of the evaluation questions, standard scientific methodology, results chain of the TOC<br />
and collaboration or participation of LGUs, various stakeholders and institutional partners.<br />
In view of these objectives, we anchor our basic approaches and methodologies on three (3)<br />
essential factors:<br />
(1) ECOFISH documents and reports, (e.g. contract, work plan, M&E plan, status reports<br />
Baseline/Benchmark, operations plans, MPA related studies of the 8 sites; covenant with<br />
BFAR and partner LGUs, FISH Project documents, etc.);<br />
(2) The Results Chain-TOC framework; and<br />
(3) Development experiences of coastal and fishing communities in the country as<br />
manifested in previous project completion evaluation and assessment studies and<br />
baseline/benchmark surveys undertaken by the ECOFISH Project and the Department of<br />
Agriculture-BFAR in the 8 MKBAs.<br />
Moreover, the following matrix illustrates the conduct of the performance evaluation along the<br />
four axes: relevance (pertinence), process (effectiveness and efficiency), effects (achievement<br />
of the project’s specific objectives), and outcome (achievement of the program’s overall<br />
objective. Incorporating the levels of analysis and evaluation provides a guide to the SDS<br />
approach to the performance evaluation.<br />
Table 13. Matrix Illustrating the Conduct of the Performance Evaluation<br />
Relevance Process Effects Outcome<br />
Pertinence<br />
Design Evaluation<br />
Consistency<br />
Alignment<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Efficiency<br />
Process assessment<br />
Structure assessment<br />
Appropriation and<br />
participation (with<br />
respect to partners<br />
and beneficiaries)<br />
Institutional and<br />
capacity building<br />
Impact<br />
Objectives/results<br />
assessment<br />
Coverage and depth<br />
Institutional and<br />
capacity building<br />
Sustainability<br />
Design evaluation<br />
Objectives/results<br />
assessment<br />
Appropriation and<br />
participation (with<br />
respect to final<br />
beneficiaries)<br />
Exclusion/marginalization, gender equity, social-cultural factors, economic and technological<br />
trends, etc.<br />
3.2 Approach and Methodology<br />
The proposed performance evaluation design and framework embodies the following proven<br />
approaches in attaining the objectives of these consulting engagements.<br />
Consultative Approach. This framework entails the interplay of various stakeholders, thus, calling<br />
for clear understanding and consideration of various stakeholders’ cultures and interests in the<br />
performance evaluation and assessment process. We envision a work plan that leverages on the<br />
Annex 2 - 9