EVALUATION

Fisheries use
zoning plan
implemented (with
corresponding
legal or policy
instrument) and
monitored
P/A
Local
constituencies for
fisheries
management
organized and
actively involved
P/A
Multi-institutional
collaboration on
coastal and
fisheries resources
management
(CFRM)
P/A
Species-specific
management
measures
established
P/A
Gear-specific
management
measures
established
P/A
Mangrove
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes. All records are
with the LGU/PLGU
and Ecofish.
verified if the claims of
the LGUs are correct
(e.g. presence of the
documents.
Yes. All of the indicators
presented are criteria to
establish/determine the
benchmark for the EAFM
status of each LGU. The
data has not been
verified if the claims of
the LGUs are correct
(e.g. presence of the
documents.
attain level 2 of at least
7 out of the 11 criteria.
The analysis will be
based on the
established benchmark
made by Ecofish. To be
EAFM, each LGU
under the MKBA must
attain level 2 of at least
7 out of the 11 criteria.
Benchmarking is the
best approach for this
kind of evaluation.
Annex 4 - 34