EVALUATION

Result area: better employment
Indicator/unit Appropriateness Data Availability Data Quality Analyses Overall Remarks
Number of
households (HHs)
with better
employment
resulting from the
monitoring
surveys of 5000
HH across all 8
MKBAs.
* Better =
PMP/baseline
report indicators;
** HH = are lower
income fishing
HHs using
municipal fishing
grounds; track
same HH
Yes. A household is
the very basic unit
to measure for this
indicator
Yes. The assessment for
“better employment”
covers the fishing HH
income by source:
marine based and land
based. Also included the
HH fishing profile in
terms of fishing gears,
top most species caught
and expenditures. The
quality of data was
enhanced such that the
protocol for data
collection for B,M,F will
be the same HHs.
With the presence of
high number of HH
surveys collected at
different time intervals,
the approach would be
using Propensity
Matching scores
between before and
after and with and
without program
intervention.
A good analysis can be
done for this indicator
considering that it can
track % of household
with better income due
to Ecofish intervention
at the EOP.
Number of HHs
meeting criteria
for better
employment
Yes. A household is
the very basic unit
to measure for this
indicator.
Yes. Available in the
baseline assessment
report and the recently
concluded midterm
monitoring report that
was/will be submitted
to USAID. The data
gathering is scheduled
to be monitored as
baseline, at midterm
and EOP. Close to
5,000 HH was reported
during the baseline
assessment report and
the same number
was/will be surveyed for
the midterm and EOP.
At the minimum, HH
surveys covered 3
municipalities per
MKBA where the MPAs
are located and at least
more than 100 HHs
were surveyed per
municipality except one
LGU (Rosario) in
Lingayen Gulf.
Other indicators not reported by Ecofish for this result area: Poverty threshold information.
Annex 4 - 4