Army - Kicking Tires On Jltv
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Birth Era<br />
May Factor<br />
In Risk<br />
Of Suicide<br />
By Col. James Griffith, <strong>Army</strong> National Guard retired,<br />
and Craig Bryan<br />
The U.S. military has seen a marked increase in the<br />
number of suicides among personnel. For example,<br />
the suicide rate rose from 10.3 suicides per 100,000<br />
service members in 2001 to 15.8 suicides per 100,000<br />
service members in 2008. This 50 percent increase across all<br />
the armed services was largely due to the suicide rate in the<br />
U.S. <strong>Army</strong>, which doubled during the same time period.<br />
Because the <strong>Army</strong> contributed substantially to ground<br />
forces in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom,<br />
many have speculated that the increased prevalence of suicide<br />
was related to military personnel who were deployed, participated<br />
in combat, or experienced an overall high operating<br />
tempo. We argue that these factors do not necessarily explain<br />
the rise in suicides in the U.S. military. Rather, the increase<br />
indicates a broader trend of increased vulnerability among<br />
more recent generations of young adults.<br />
We elaborated on this argument in a paper we wrote for the<br />
journal Armed Services and Society, and we presented it last fall<br />
to the Inter-University on Armed Forces and Society, an international<br />
organization that studies social and behavioral issues<br />
involving the military. The following is a summary of our<br />
findings.<br />
Birth Cohort and Suicide<br />
Sociologists Jean Stockard and Robert O’Brien suggested in<br />
a 2002 article for the peer-reviewed academic journal Social<br />
Forces that increased suicide rates among young adults in the<br />
general population reflected generational declines in social integration<br />
and behavioral regulation. Social integration entails<br />
having access to predictable, stable and enduring social ties<br />
that can provide support and relief to individuals during times<br />
of stress. Behavioral regulation refers to the strength of norms<br />
that determine the acceptability of certain behaviors. These<br />
two processes formed the cornerstone of Emile Durkheim’s<br />
analyses of suicides among Protestants and Catholics in Europe<br />
during the late 19th century, documented in his 1897<br />
treatise, Le Suicide.<br />
Both social integration and behavioral regulation are influenced<br />
by demographic trends. Increases in birth rates and single<br />
parenthood may strain social institutions that promote social<br />
integration and behavioral norms such as families, schools,<br />
recreational clubs and religious organizations. There are more<br />
children to care for, but fewer adults are involved. Children in<br />
these generations have less attention and supervision while<br />
growing up, and social integration and behavioral regulation<br />
may be lessened.<br />
Stockard and O’Brien found that people from generations<br />
with these characteristics had relatively higher suicide rates<br />
throughout their lives. Their first finding was that among more<br />
recent birth cohorts, suicide rates in the U.S. population have<br />
increased among teenagers and young adults. They studied the<br />
distribution of suicides for age intervals in three time periods:<br />
1930, 1965 and 2000. In 1930, the total U.S. population<br />
showed progressively increased suicide rates from younger to<br />
older age intervals. In 1960, a similar pattern of rates occurred<br />
until ages 55 to 59, where the increase was less evident. In<br />
2000, this pattern of increase was even less apparent.<br />
U.S. <strong>Army</strong>/Pfc. William Hatton<br />
February 2016 ■ ARMY 53