26.12.2016 Views

Army - Kicking Tires On Jltv

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FREE TO<br />

AUSA<br />

MEMBERS<br />

Receive AUSA’s<br />

Legislative Newsletter<br />

electronically each<br />

week.<br />

Stay current on<br />

legislative activity that<br />

affects you.<br />

E-mail AUSA at<br />

jrudowski@ausa.org<br />

using the subject line<br />

“Newsletter” to begin<br />

your free subscription.<br />

terrain for effective fields of fire. Understanding<br />

this, the reader should regard<br />

the 3rd Division’s stand on the Marne<br />

River on July 15, 1918, differently, at<br />

least in terms of the criticisms leveled at<br />

French units on the division’s flanks.<br />

Lengel ably shows how U.S. commanders<br />

exaggerated the importance of almost<br />

every battle, claiming their units<br />

fought at the point of main enemy effort,<br />

against overwhelming odds and elite<br />

German units, and without the considerable<br />

support of their Allies, among other<br />

factors. Again, the Champagne-Marne<br />

defensive serves as a great example.<br />

For 100 years, the 3rd Marne Division<br />

proudly claimed to have saved Paris. It<br />

didn’t. Lengel clearly documents that the<br />

German attack on the Marne was a supporting<br />

effort in a secondary area with no<br />

intention of reaching Paris. This does not<br />

denigrate the valor and sacrifice of the<br />

brave men positioned along the Marne in<br />

the middle of July, but it does place the<br />

battle’s importance in proper perspective.<br />

Lengel lays the responsibility for thousands<br />

of needless deaths at the feet of inexperienced<br />

and incompetent commanders<br />

at all levels who failed to prevent<br />

junior leaders and soldiers from using<br />

outdated and fatal linear tactics in the<br />

face of machine guns and massed artillery.<br />

He discusses the age-old problem of<br />

where on the battlefield commanders<br />

should be to decisively affect the fight—<br />

he takes the chain of command of the<br />

2nd Division to task for this failure in<br />

the battle for Belleau Wood, where commanders<br />

made the wrong decision with<br />

incomplete information while far removed<br />

from the fight.<br />

He also excoriates the 2nd Brigade,<br />

1st Division’s commander, Brig. Gen.<br />

Beaumont Buck, for “whizzing about the<br />

battlefields, with no obvious purpose<br />

other than to see what a real war looked<br />

like” while his brigade was being decimated<br />

in the attack south of Soissons,<br />

July 18–22, 1918.<br />

Lengel takes commanders at all levels<br />

to task for not passing on their units’<br />

lessons learned from early combat actions,<br />

with new units repeating the mistakes<br />

made by the “experienced” divisions<br />

because they did not know better.<br />

Brig. Gen. James Harbord, commanding<br />

the 4th Brigade, 2nd Division, appears<br />

to be criminally negligent in his failure to<br />

pass on lessons learned by the Marines in<br />

Belleau Wood to the 7th Infantry Regiment<br />

that replaced them, condemning<br />

that unit to failure and resulting in hundreds<br />

of needless deaths.<br />

This book contains many more critical<br />

observations and new interpretations<br />

that will challenge readers’ understanding<br />

of the American Expeditionary<br />

Forces’ performance in World War I.<br />

Each point is well-argued and well-supported.<br />

Commanders and units are exposed<br />

to criticism, with some looking<br />

better and some looking worse once seen<br />

through Lengel’s lens.<br />

Despite the many critical assessments<br />

made in this book, the American soldiers<br />

and Marines who fought in difficult conditions<br />

under often-incompetent commanders<br />

and with terrible logistic support<br />

are judged to be brave men who<br />

performed their duty as best they knew<br />

how, and with an aggressive spirit and<br />

abiding faith in the superiority of the<br />

American way.<br />

The French poilu and French colonial<br />

troops are given the due they have<br />

been denied by American historians for<br />

nearly a century. The German landser is<br />

shown to be no Superman, but is still<br />

depicted as a brave and determined foe<br />

who continued to fight with discipline<br />

and cunning even as the cause appeared<br />

to be lost.<br />

I heartily recommend Lengel’s excellent<br />

book to anyone interested in the<br />

American Expeditionary Forces in World<br />

War I, and the development of the U.S.<br />

<strong>Army</strong> into a professional fighting force.<br />

Lt. Col. Timothy R. Stoy, USA Ret., is the<br />

historian for the 15th Infantry Regiment<br />

Association and the Society of the 3rd Infantry<br />

Division.<br />

1-855-246-6269<br />

That’s the toll-free number to call<br />

AUSA national headquarters. The AUSA<br />

Action Line is open 8 a.m.–5 p.m. Monday<br />

through Thursday, and 8 a.m.–1:30<br />

p.m. Friday, except holidays. If you have<br />

a question about AUSA, give us a call.<br />

70 ARMY ■ February 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!