Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
40 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONE<br />
the centuries old search for a responsible way to deal with<br />
unavoidable violence. Is it still appropriate to present the “traditional”<br />
doctrine of the just war, 4 in the public forum, as a moral<br />
framework within which we may answer questions concerning<br />
the legitimacy of a war and the morality of the conduct of that<br />
war?<br />
In its present form, the JWD is usually taken to mean an ethical<br />
and/or legal doctrine which, while adopting a presumption<br />
against war, holds that it may be justified, according to a set of<br />
criteria. A first group of these criteria refers to the decision to go<br />
to war, and requires legitimate authority, just cause, right intention,<br />
while the second concerns the conduct of war, and requires<br />
discrimination, proportionality, last resort, and reasonable hope<br />
of success. The criteria of proportionality refer both to the decision<br />
to go to war— the foreseen harms which inevitably accompany<br />
war ought be proportionate to the good being sought—<br />
and to the use of violence for particular objectives, which ought<br />
to be proportionate to the importance of this objective for<br />
achieving the purpose of the war.<br />
Critics, have long seen the doctrine as a corruption of the<br />
genuine Christian tradition. 5 It is further charged that it has not<br />
fostered peace, but has simply opened the way to the justification<br />
of violence, which has resulted in the murder of millions. 6<br />
As a response to the first criticism, this article will offer an interpretation<br />
of how the change in the tradition, from the early<br />
Church’s rejection of violence, to the acceptance of just war,<br />
came about. In respect to the second charge, historical studies<br />
have claimed that the doctrine was invoked to legitimize wars,<br />
or at least that authorities twisted the doctrine to provide pretexts<br />
for their wars. 7 According to one author, even St. Francis of<br />
4 Henceforth, the JWD.<br />
5<br />
ROLAND H. BAINTON, Christian Attitudes to War and Peace (Nashville:<br />
Abingdon, 1960) 236.<br />
6<br />
JOHN DEAR, The God of Peace:Towards a Theology of Nonviolence<br />
(Maryknoll N.Y: Orbis Books, 1994) 126.<br />
7<br />
JAMES TURNER JOHNSON, Ideology, Reason, and the Limitations of War<br />
(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975) 19.