11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONE<br />

the centuries old search for a responsible way to deal with<br />

unavoidable violence. Is it still appropriate to present the “traditional”<br />

doctrine of the just war, 4 in the public forum, as a moral<br />

framework within which we may answer questions concerning<br />

the legitimacy of a war and the morality of the conduct of that<br />

war?<br />

In its present form, the JWD is usually taken to mean an ethical<br />

and/or legal doctrine which, while adopting a presumption<br />

against war, holds that it may be justified, according to a set of<br />

criteria. A first group of these criteria refers to the decision to go<br />

to war, and requires legitimate authority, just cause, right intention,<br />

while the second concerns the conduct of war, and requires<br />

discrimination, proportionality, last resort, and reasonable hope<br />

of success. The criteria of proportionality refer both to the decision<br />

to go to war— the foreseen harms which inevitably accompany<br />

war ought be proportionate to the good being sought—<br />

and to the use of violence for particular objectives, which ought<br />

to be proportionate to the importance of this objective for<br />

achieving the purpose of the war.<br />

Critics, have long seen the doctrine as a corruption of the<br />

genuine Christian tradition. 5 It is further charged that it has not<br />

fostered peace, but has simply opened the way to the justification<br />

of violence, which has resulted in the murder of millions. 6<br />

As a response to the first criticism, this article will offer an interpretation<br />

of how the change in the tradition, from the early<br />

Church’s rejection of violence, to the acceptance of just war,<br />

came about. In respect to the second charge, historical studies<br />

have claimed that the doctrine was invoked to legitimize wars,<br />

or at least that authorities twisted the doctrine to provide pretexts<br />

for their wars. 7 According to one author, even St. Francis of<br />

4 Henceforth, the JWD.<br />

5<br />

ROLAND H. BAINTON, Christian Attitudes to War and Peace (Nashville:<br />

Abingdon, 1960) 236.<br />

6<br />

JOHN DEAR, The God of Peace:Towards a Theology of Nonviolence<br />

(Maryknoll N.Y: Orbis Books, 1994) 126.<br />

7<br />

JAMES TURNER JOHNSON, Ideology, Reason, and the Limitations of War<br />

(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975) 19.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!