06.03.2017 Views

“License to Kill”

nDPE309A46S

nDPE309A46S

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International law specifies that governments have a duty <strong>to</strong> investigate and prosecute<br />

serious violations of physical integrity, including violations of the right <strong>to</strong> life. The<br />

Human Rights Committee has frequently reminded government of their obligation <strong>to</strong><br />

ensure effective remedies for violations of the right <strong>to</strong> life, including extrajudicial<br />

executions. Governments are obligated <strong>to</strong> conduct prompt, thorough and effective<br />

investigations through independent and impartial judicial bodies; bring <strong>to</strong> justice those<br />

responsible for criminal offenses; provide prompt and full reparations <strong>to</strong> victims; and<br />

prevent future violations. 260<br />

The UN Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary,<br />

and Summary Executions affirm that “extra-legal, arbitrary, and summary executions”<br />

cannot be carried out “under any circumstances” and that “[g]overnments shall prohibit<br />

by law all extra-legal, arbitrary and summary executions and shall ensure that any such<br />

executions are recognized as offences under their criminal laws.” 261 According <strong>to</strong> the<br />

principles, governments “shall prohibit orders from superior officers or public authorities<br />

authorizing or inciting other persons <strong>to</strong> carry out any such extralegal, arbitrary or summary<br />

executions. All persons shall have the right and the duty <strong>to</strong> defy such orders” (emphasis<br />

added). The principles also affirm that training of law enforcement officials shall<br />

emphasize these duties and prohibitions. 262<br />

Rights Council Resolution 26/12, Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions,<br />

A/HRC/26/L.23, para. 3.<br />

260 UN Human Rights Committee has stated that the ICCPR “requires that States Parties make reparation <strong>to</strong> individuals<br />

whose Covenant rights have been violated. Without reparation <strong>to</strong> individuals whose Covenant rights have been violated, the<br />

obligation <strong>to</strong> provide an effective remedy which is central <strong>to</strong> the efficacy of [enforcing the ICCPR] is not discharged. … [T]he<br />

Covenant generally entails appropriate compensation.” Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, International<br />

covenant on civil and political rights, para. 16. Compensation covers material losses, such as medical expenses and the loss<br />

of earnings, as well as economically assessable moral damage, such as pain and suffering. Basic Principles and Guidelines<br />

on the Right <strong>to</strong> a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious<br />

Violations of International Humanitarian Law, adopted on December 16, 2005, U.N. Doc. A/Res/60/147, principle 20.<br />

261 UN Economic and Social Council, Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary and<br />

Summary Executions, Resolution 1989/65 (1989), U.N. Doc. E/1989/89 (1989), principle 1.<br />

262 Ibid., paras. 1, 3.<br />

LICENSE TO KILL 80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!