06.03.2017 Views

“License to Kill”

nDPE309A46S

nDPE309A46S

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during times of peace if they<br />

are part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. 279 The Rome<br />

Statute defines an “attack against a civilian population” as “a course of conduct involving<br />

the multiple commission of [acts such as murder] against any civilian population, pursuant<br />

<strong>to</strong> or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy <strong>to</strong> commit such attack.” 280<br />

“Widespread” refers <strong>to</strong> the scale of the acts or number of victims. 281 A “systematic” attack<br />

indicates “a pattern or methodical plan.” 282 However, while a plan or policy may be<br />

evidentially relevant in proving that an attack was directed against a civilian population, it is<br />

not a legal element of a crime against humanity. 283<br />

For individuals <strong>to</strong> be found culpable of crimes against humanity, they must have had<br />

knowledge of the crime. That is, perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs must have been aware that their actions<br />

formed part of the widespread or systematic attack against the civilian population. 284<br />

279 The attacks underlying the commission of crimes against humanity must be widespread or systematic, it need not be<br />

both. See ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Duško Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Opinion and Judgment (Trial Chamber), May 7, 1997,<br />

http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/tjug/en/tad-tsj70507JT2-e.pdf, para. 646 (“it is now well established that…the<br />

acts…can…occur on either a widespread basis or in a systematic manner. Either one of these is sufficient <strong>to</strong> exclude isolated<br />

or random acts.”).<br />

280 Rome Statute, art. 7 (2) (a).<br />

281 Widespread is defined as “massive, frequent, large scale action, carried out collectively with considerable seriousness<br />

and directed against a multiplicity of victims.” See, ICTR, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, Judgment<br />

(Trial Chamber I), September 2, 1998, http://unictr.unmict.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-96-4/trialjudgements/en/980902.pdf,<br />

para. 579; see also ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Dario Kordić and Mario Čerkez, Case No. IT-92-14/2, Trial<br />

Chamber III, February 26, 2001, http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kordic_cerkez/tjug/en/kor-tj010226e.pdf, para. 179; ICTR,<br />

Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana, Case No. ICTR-95-1-T, Trial Chamber II, May 21, 1999,<br />

http://unictr.unmict.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-95-1/trial-judgements/en/990521.pdf, para. 123.<br />

282 ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Duško Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Opinion and Judgment (Trial Chamber), May 7, 1997,<br />

http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/tjug/en/tad-tsj70507JT2-e.pdf, para. 648. In Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir<br />

Kovač, and Zoran Voković the Appeals Chamber stated that “patterns of crimes—that is the non-accidental repetition of<br />

similar criminal conduct on a regular basis—are a common expression of [a] systematic occurrence.” ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v.<br />

Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovač, and Zoran Voković, Case No. IT-96-23 and IT-96-23-1A, Judgment (Appeals Chamber),<br />

June 12, 2002, http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/acjug/en/kun-aj020612e.pdf, para. 94.<br />

283 ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Tihomir Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-A, Appeals Chamber, July 29, 2004,<br />

http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/acjug/en/bla-aj040729e.pdf, para. 120.<br />

284 See ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Kupreškić et al., Case No. IT-95-16-T, Trial Chamber, January 14, 2000,<br />

http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kupreskic/tjug/en/kup-tj000114e.pdf, para. 556 (“[T]he requisite mens rea for crimes against<br />

humanity appears <strong>to</strong> be comprised by (1) the intent <strong>to</strong> commit the underlying offence, combined with (2) knowledge of the<br />

broader context in which that offence occurs.”) See also, ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Duško Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A, Judgement<br />

(Appeals Chamber), July 15, 1999, http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acjug/en/tad-aj990715e.pdf, para. 271; ICTR,<br />

Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana, Case No. ICTR-95-1-T, Judgement (Trial Chamber II), May 21, 1999,<br />

http://unictr.unmict.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-95-1/trial-judgements/en/990521.pdf, paras. 133-34.<br />

85 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MARCH 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!