06.03.2017 Views

“License to Kill”

nDPE309A46S

nDPE309A46S

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y the physical perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs needs <strong>to</strong> be<br />

“<br />

shown, including where the instigation<br />

Here is Congress and here is the<br />

Supreme Court drawn in<strong>to</strong> a<br />

arises from public utterances. 268<br />

stalemate just <strong>to</strong> have the safety<br />

nets of an abusive despot or<br />

While international law says little about<br />

dicta<strong>to</strong>r. Where will I go then?<br />

incitement outside the context of<br />

So if the Supreme Court decides<br />

incitement <strong>to</strong> genocide, it does set out<br />

otherwise and here is Congress,<br />

basic requirements. In common law<br />

what will I do now? There is no<br />

more control. The three great<br />

jurisdictions, incitement <strong>to</strong> commit a<br />

branches of government, two<br />

crime is defined as encouraging or<br />

are against one another so I, as<br />

persuading another <strong>to</strong> commit a crime,<br />

President, will decide.”<br />

whether or not the crime is actually ―Rodrigo Duterte, January 14, 2017<br />

committed. Civil law systems punish<br />

direct and public incitement assuming<br />

the form of provocation, which is defined as an act intended directly <strong>to</strong> provoke another<br />

<strong>to</strong> commit a crime or a misdemeanor through speeches, shouting, or threats, or any other<br />

means of audiovisual communication. 269 The “direct” element involves specifically<br />

urging another individual <strong>to</strong> take immediate criminal action rather than merely making a<br />

vague or indirect suggestion. 270<br />

The prosecu<strong>to</strong>r of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Fa<strong>to</strong>u Bensouda, issued a<br />

statement <strong>to</strong> President Duterte in Oc<strong>to</strong>ber, warning him that: “Any person in the<br />

Philippines who incites or engages in acts of mass violence including by ordering,<br />

requesting, encouraging or contributing, in any other manner, <strong>to</strong> the commission of crimes<br />

within the jurisdiction of the ICC is potentially liable for prosecution before the court.” 271<br />

268 See, ICTY, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Radoslav Brđanin, Case No. IT-99-36-T, Trial Chamber II, September 1, 2004,<br />

http://www.icty.org/x/cases/brdanin/tjug/en/brd-tj040901e.pdf, para. 359.<br />

269 See, ICTR, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Juvénal Kajelijeli, Case No. ICTR-98-44A-T, Trial Chamber II, December 1, 2003,<br />

http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/ICTR/KAJELIJELI_ICTR-98-44A/KAJELIJELI_ICTR-98-44A-T.pdf, para. 850.<br />

270 See, ICTR, Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v. Tharcisse Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-2000-55A-T, Trial Chamber II, September 12, 2006,<br />

http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/ICTR/MUVUNYI_ICTR-00-55/MUVUNYI_ICTR-2000-55A-T.pdf, para. 502.<br />

271 “Statement of the Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r of the International Criminal Court, Fa<strong>to</strong>u Bensouda concerning the situation in the Republic of<br />

the Philippines,” ICC news release, Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 13, 2016, https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/item.aspx?name=161013-otp-stat-php.<br />

83 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MARCH 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!