12.12.2012 Views

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>and</strong>om spread <strong>in</strong> emission velocities was done by Riyopoulos et al. [33].<br />

They found that by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the effects <strong>of</strong> these r<strong>and</strong>om parameters,<br />

the effective secondary electron yield, σ ∗ se, was reduced to a number <strong>in</strong><br />

the range σse/2 < σ ∗ se < σse. This means that the effective secondary<br />

electron yield will be a function not only <strong>of</strong> the impact velocity, but also<br />

<strong>of</strong> the resonant phase as well as the phase spread caused by the spread<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial velocities <strong>and</strong> secondary delay times. Another study, which<br />

supports this result, <strong>in</strong>vestigated the effect on the different resonance<br />

zones for different values <strong>of</strong> the maximum SEY due to <strong>in</strong>itial velocity<br />

spread [46]. It was found that, except for the first order mode, a realistic<br />

thermal spread <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial electrons raised the multipactor SEY<br />

requirement from unity to above unity. For the higher order modes a<br />

SEY greater than approximately 1.5 was necessary to compensate for<br />

the losses <strong>in</strong>curred. In addition, with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g velocity spread, the<br />

multipactor zones started to overlap. The <strong>in</strong>creased SEY requirement<br />

will result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased threshold for the higher order modes <strong>and</strong> can<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> the success with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the first cross-over po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the Hatch<br />

<strong>and</strong> Williams charts when fitt<strong>in</strong>g experimental data (see Fig.2.5).<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial velocities can be seen when<br />

construct<strong>in</strong>g multipactor charts for a constant <strong>in</strong>itial velocity without allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

compensation for electron losses outside the phase stability range.<br />

In Fig. 2.11 zones bounded by solid l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate the region where multipactor<br />

can take place under this assumption. The dashed l<strong>in</strong>es make<br />

up wider zones that encompass the other zones <strong>and</strong> are identical to the<br />

zones shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.3.<br />

By <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a higher secondary electron yield <strong>and</strong> a spread <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

velocities, the multipactor zones will become wider than the solid<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e zones. A σse greater than unity, which will be the case when the<br />

impact velocity is greater than the first cross-over po<strong>in</strong>t, will compensate<br />

for some <strong>of</strong> the losses <strong>in</strong>curred due to phase <strong>in</strong>stability. A spread<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial velocities will widen the range <strong>of</strong> possible resonant phases (cf.<br />

Eq. (2.9)) <strong>and</strong> the left <strong>and</strong> right limits will not be as sharp as <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

by the solid l<strong>in</strong>e multipactor zones <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.11. This widen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

multipactor zones has been taken <strong>in</strong>to account to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent <strong>in</strong> the<br />

traditional analytical approach, which is <strong>in</strong>dicated by the wider dashed<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e zones <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.11. However, the widen<strong>in</strong>g should not only be towards<br />

the left side, but also towards the right [39]. Furthermore, the<br />

sharp lower left corner <strong>of</strong> each dashed l<strong>in</strong>e zone is mislead<strong>in</strong>g, as that<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate a po<strong>in</strong>t where the secondary electron emission is unity <strong>and</strong> the<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!