Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>and</strong>om spread <strong>in</strong> emission velocities was done by Riyopoulos et al. [33].<br />
They found that by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the effects <strong>of</strong> these r<strong>and</strong>om parameters,<br />
the effective secondary electron yield, σ ∗ se, was reduced to a number <strong>in</strong><br />
the range σse/2 < σ ∗ se < σse. This means that the effective secondary<br />
electron yield will be a function not only <strong>of</strong> the impact velocity, but also<br />
<strong>of</strong> the resonant phase as well as the phase spread caused by the spread<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial velocities <strong>and</strong> secondary delay times. Another study, which<br />
supports this result, <strong>in</strong>vestigated the effect on the different resonance<br />
zones for different values <strong>of</strong> the maximum SEY due to <strong>in</strong>itial velocity<br />
spread [46]. It was found that, except for the first order mode, a realistic<br />
thermal spread <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial electrons raised the multipactor SEY<br />
requirement from unity to above unity. For the higher order modes a<br />
SEY greater than approximately 1.5 was necessary to compensate for<br />
the losses <strong>in</strong>curred. In addition, with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g velocity spread, the<br />
multipactor zones started to overlap. The <strong>in</strong>creased SEY requirement<br />
will result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased threshold for the higher order modes <strong>and</strong> can<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> the success with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the first cross-over po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the Hatch<br />
<strong>and</strong> Williams charts when fitt<strong>in</strong>g experimental data (see Fig.2.5).<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial velocities can be seen when<br />
construct<strong>in</strong>g multipactor charts for a constant <strong>in</strong>itial velocity without allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
compensation for electron losses outside the phase stability range.<br />
In Fig. 2.11 zones bounded by solid l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate the region where multipactor<br />
can take place under this assumption. The dashed l<strong>in</strong>es make<br />
up wider zones that encompass the other zones <strong>and</strong> are identical to the<br />
zones shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.3.<br />
By <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a higher secondary electron yield <strong>and</strong> a spread <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
velocities, the multipactor zones will become wider than the solid<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e zones. A σse greater than unity, which will be the case when the<br />
impact velocity is greater than the first cross-over po<strong>in</strong>t, will compensate<br />
for some <strong>of</strong> the losses <strong>in</strong>curred due to phase <strong>in</strong>stability. A spread<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial velocities will widen the range <strong>of</strong> possible resonant phases (cf.<br />
Eq. (2.9)) <strong>and</strong> the left <strong>and</strong> right limits will not be as sharp as <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
by the solid l<strong>in</strong>e multipactor zones <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.11. This widen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />
multipactor zones has been taken <strong>in</strong>to account to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent <strong>in</strong> the<br />
traditional analytical approach, which is <strong>in</strong>dicated by the wider dashed<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e zones <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.11. However, the widen<strong>in</strong>g should not only be towards<br />
the left side, but also towards the right [39]. Furthermore, the<br />
sharp lower left corner <strong>of</strong> each dashed l<strong>in</strong>e zone is mislead<strong>in</strong>g, as that<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate a po<strong>in</strong>t where the secondary electron emission is unity <strong>and</strong> the<br />
24