Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The step-like behaviour <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g threshold is due to the fact<br />
that several multipactor zones are <strong>in</strong>volved (f · h ≈ 11.5 GHz·mm).<br />
Start<strong>in</strong>g with mode number N = 7 for ’current model a)’, the lower<br />
threshold for the parallel-plate case is found <strong>and</strong> as the h/l-ratio <strong>in</strong>creases,<br />
the zone correspond<strong>in</strong>g to N = 7 shr<strong>in</strong>ks until, with an almost<br />
sudden voltage step, the next threshold, be<strong>in</strong>g determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the N = 5<br />
zone, is reached. F<strong>in</strong>ally the last N = 3 zone determ<strong>in</strong>es the threshold<br />
before it also vanishes.<br />
In addition to the experimental comparison, Fig. 4.5 br<strong>in</strong>gs forward<br />
the importance <strong>of</strong> different parameters <strong>of</strong> the current model as well as <strong>of</strong><br />
the used model for SEY [22]. By <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial velocity (’current<br />
model b)’), the overall threshold decreases as a lower field strength will<br />
be sufficient to reach the same impact velocity (cf. Eq. (2.7)). The effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased thermal spread, WT, is that the electron losses <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
<strong>and</strong> the threshold starts to <strong>in</strong>crease for lower h/l-values (also shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> ’current model b)’). By lower<strong>in</strong>g the first cross-over po<strong>in</strong>t (’current<br />
model c)’), the parallel-plate threshold decreases, s<strong>in</strong>ce an additional<br />
zone, N = 9, comes <strong>in</strong>to play. However, as it shr<strong>in</strong>ks away, the threshold<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a sudden step to the same level as <strong>in</strong> case ’a)’ <strong>and</strong> then it<br />
follows ’a)’ except that the steps occur at higher h/l-values. An <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
first cross-over po<strong>in</strong>t, case ’d)’, shows a change <strong>of</strong> behaviour opposite to<br />
’c)’, except for the parallel-plate threshold as it is still the N = 7 zone<br />
that determ<strong>in</strong>es this threshold.<br />
In the current model a uniform electric field has been used. Due to<br />
the geometry <strong>of</strong> the iris, the actual electric field will tend to be curved<br />
outwards at the edges <strong>of</strong> the slot <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g straight (cf. Fig. 4.1).<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the field amplitude is higher <strong>in</strong> the centre <strong>of</strong> the iris than at the<br />
edges, the Miller force [10], which is proportional to the negative gradient<br />
<strong>of</strong> the square <strong>of</strong> the electric field amplitude, will tend to push the<br />
electrons out <strong>of</strong> the iris. This effect is most important for the higher<br />
order resonances, where several RF-cycles are required to cross the gap.<br />
In addition to the Miller force, the curved electric field will have a component<br />
<strong>in</strong> the z-direction, which, <strong>in</strong> particular for the first order mode,<br />
will drive the electrons toward the iris edges. This means that the electron<br />
losses will be greater than <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a uniform field, which<br />
will lead to an even further <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> the multipactor threshold. This<br />
effect should be more pronounced for th<strong>in</strong> irises <strong>and</strong> could expla<strong>in</strong> why<br />
the current model predicts the existence <strong>of</strong> a discharge beyond a certa<strong>in</strong><br />
h/l-ratio where experiments cannot detect it (cf. Fig. 4.5).<br />
66