12.12.2012 Views

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where 〈vt 2 〉 represents the average <strong>of</strong> the square <strong>of</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

the thermal velocity. In paper C, a differential equation for the thermal<br />

velocity is derived, viz.<br />

d〈vt 2 〉<br />

dt + (νcδ + νiz)〈vt 2 〉 = u 2 (νc(2 − δ) + νiz) (3.16)<br />

where δ is the energy loss coefficient. By assum<strong>in</strong>g that νc, νiz <strong>and</strong> δ are<br />

constants, like before, Eq. (3.16) can be solved explicitly <strong>and</strong> with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial condition 〈vt 2 (t = α/ω)〉 = 0, the thermal impact velocity, when<br />

ωt = Nπ + α, can be found <strong>and</strong> thus the total impact velocity can be<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed. However, the expression is very complicated <strong>and</strong> will not<br />

be reproduced here.<br />

The total impact velocity will determ<strong>in</strong>e the secondary electron emission<br />

yield. For vacuum multipactor as well as <strong>in</strong> the previous simple<br />

model for low pressure multipactor, the impact velocity was perpendicular<br />

to the electrodes. In such a case, the secondary yield depends only<br />

on the impact velocity. However, for angular <strong>in</strong>cidence, which will be<br />

the case now with the r<strong>and</strong>om three dimensional thermal velocity component,<br />

the yield will be a function not only <strong>of</strong> the impact energy but<br />

also <strong>of</strong> the angle <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence. To account for the angular <strong>in</strong>cidence the<br />

expressions given <strong>in</strong> Ref. [22] have been used <strong>and</strong> for ease <strong>of</strong> reference<br />

they are reproduced here,<br />

ɛmax(θ) = ɛmax(0)(1 + θ 2 /π) (3.17)<br />

σse,max(θ) = σse,max(0)(1 + θ 2 /2π) (3.18)<br />

η = ɛimpact − ɛ0<br />

ɛmax(θ) − ɛ0<br />

σse = σse,max(θ)(η exp 1 − η) k<br />

(3.19)<br />

(3.20)<br />

where θ is the impact angle with respect to the surface normal. ɛmax is<br />

the impact energy when the secondary emission reaches its maximum,<br />

σse,max. ɛimpact is the total impact energy <strong>and</strong> ɛ0 is the energy limit<br />

for non-zero σse. The formulas are valid for “a typical dull surface”,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ref. [22]. The coefficient k is given by k = 0.62 for η < 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> k = 0.25 for η > 1.<br />

In vacuum multipactor, the only source <strong>of</strong> new electrons is secondary<br />

yield from each impact. When the phenomenon takes place <strong>in</strong> a gas,<br />

another potential source <strong>of</strong> new electrons is impact ionisation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

gas molecules. The ionisation threshold <strong>of</strong> most gases <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest is<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!