Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
where 〈vt 2 〉 represents the average <strong>of</strong> the square <strong>of</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />
the thermal velocity. In paper C, a differential equation for the thermal<br />
velocity is derived, viz.<br />
d〈vt 2 〉<br />
dt + (νcδ + νiz)〈vt 2 〉 = u 2 (νc(2 − δ) + νiz) (3.16)<br />
where δ is the energy loss coefficient. By assum<strong>in</strong>g that νc, νiz <strong>and</strong> δ are<br />
constants, like before, Eq. (3.16) can be solved explicitly <strong>and</strong> with the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial condition 〈vt 2 (t = α/ω)〉 = 0, the thermal impact velocity, when<br />
ωt = Nπ + α, can be found <strong>and</strong> thus the total impact velocity can be<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed. However, the expression is very complicated <strong>and</strong> will not<br />
be reproduced here.<br />
The total impact velocity will determ<strong>in</strong>e the secondary electron emission<br />
yield. For vacuum multipactor as well as <strong>in</strong> the previous simple<br />
model for low pressure multipactor, the impact velocity was perpendicular<br />
to the electrodes. In such a case, the secondary yield depends only<br />
on the impact velocity. However, for angular <strong>in</strong>cidence, which will be<br />
the case now with the r<strong>and</strong>om three dimensional thermal velocity component,<br />
the yield will be a function not only <strong>of</strong> the impact energy but<br />
also <strong>of</strong> the angle <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence. To account for the angular <strong>in</strong>cidence the<br />
expressions given <strong>in</strong> Ref. [22] have been used <strong>and</strong> for ease <strong>of</strong> reference<br />
they are reproduced here,<br />
ɛmax(θ) = ɛmax(0)(1 + θ 2 /π) (3.17)<br />
σse,max(θ) = σse,max(0)(1 + θ 2 /2π) (3.18)<br />
η = ɛimpact − ɛ0<br />
ɛmax(θ) − ɛ0<br />
σse = σse,max(θ)(η exp 1 − η) k<br />
(3.19)<br />
(3.20)<br />
where θ is the impact angle with respect to the surface normal. ɛmax is<br />
the impact energy when the secondary emission reaches its maximum,<br />
σse,max. ɛimpact is the total impact energy <strong>and</strong> ɛ0 is the energy limit<br />
for non-zero σse. The formulas are valid for “a typical dull surface”,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ref. [22]. The coefficient k is given by k = 0.62 for η < 1<br />
<strong>and</strong> k = 0.25 for η > 1.<br />
In vacuum multipactor, the only source <strong>of</strong> new electrons is secondary<br />
yield from each impact. When the phenomenon takes place <strong>in</strong> a gas,<br />
another potential source <strong>of</strong> new electrons is impact ionisation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
gas molecules. The ionisation threshold <strong>of</strong> most gases <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest is<br />
46