12.12.2012 Views

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accurately describes the cross-section for the entire measurement range<br />

can be given by (cf. Fig. 3.6)<br />

σiz = q1<br />

ln ɛ/ɛi<br />

�<br />

ɛ/ɛi + 0.1(ɛ/ɛi) 2<br />

[m 2 ] (3.23)<br />

where ɛi is the ionisation threshold <strong>of</strong> argon <strong>and</strong> q1 = 4.8 × 10 −20 m 2 .<br />

Ionisation Cross Section [m 2 ]<br />

10 −19<br />

10 −20<br />

10 −21<br />

10 −22<br />

Ionisation cross section for Argon<br />

10 2<br />

Electron energy [eV]<br />

S.C.Brown<br />

H.C.Straub<br />

Analytical approximation<br />

Figure 3.6: Ionisation cross-section for electron-argon collisions. The circles<br />

<strong>and</strong> stars <strong>in</strong>dicate measurement data by S. C. Brown [58] <strong>and</strong><br />

Straub et al. [59] respectively <strong>and</strong> the solid l<strong>in</strong>e is an analytical<br />

approximation given by Eq. (3.23).<br />

3.2.3 <strong>Multipactor</strong> boundaries<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g section the above model will be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

multipactor boundaries. The best accuracy is atta<strong>in</strong>ed when solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the basic differential equations numerically while us<strong>in</strong>g good approximate<br />

formulas for the different parameters. However, such computation<br />

takes very long time, s<strong>in</strong>ce both the <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>and</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al multipactor<br />

conditions have to be fulfilled. Faster computation can be achieved<br />

by us<strong>in</strong>g different approximations, e.g. constant parameters as shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Eqs. (3.10)-(3.12), Eq. (3.13), <strong>and</strong> Eq. (3.14). Two different implementations<br />

are used <strong>in</strong> paper C, one purely numerical <strong>and</strong> one semi-<br />

10 3<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!