Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Boundary function Method<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the best eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g methods for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the worst case scenario<br />
for equally spaced carriers, the boundary function method, was orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />
designed by Wolk et al. [51]. Unfortunately the used function was<br />
found empirically while study<strong>in</strong>g the worst case scenario with an optimisation<br />
tool, <strong>and</strong> is thus not physically founded. A consequence <strong>of</strong> this is<br />
that under certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, the boundary function produces poor<br />
results. It was also limited to work only for equally spaced carriers. However,<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> the present thesis work, this method has been further<br />
developed, <strong>and</strong> it has been found that the orig<strong>in</strong>al boundary function<br />
approximately describes a function that tries to squeeze all the energy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the multicarrier signal dur<strong>in</strong>g one envelope period <strong>in</strong>to a specified,<br />
shorter, time period. This works just as well <strong>in</strong> both the equally spaced<br />
<strong>and</strong> the non-equally spaced carrier cases <strong>and</strong> can be summarized by the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g formulas:<br />
⎧ �<br />
FV (TX) =<br />
⎪⎨<br />
FV,max = N�<br />
⎪⎩ FV,m<strong>in</strong> =<br />
TH<br />
TX<br />
Ei<br />
i=1<br />
� N�<br />
E<br />
i=1<br />
2 i<br />
N�<br />
E<br />
i=1<br />
2 i<br />
(2.29)<br />
Here TX is the time period <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, which is <strong>of</strong>ten set to T20, i.e.<br />
the time it takes the electrons to traverse the gap 20 times. TH is the<br />
period <strong>of</strong> the envelope <strong>and</strong> Ei is the voltage amplitude <strong>of</strong> each carrier.<br />
FV (TX) is the design voltage <strong>and</strong> is shown as two symmetric curved l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
<strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.15. The design voltage can never exceed the <strong>in</strong>-phase voltage,<br />
given by FV,max, <strong>and</strong> if all power is distributed evenly over the entire<br />
envelope period the voltage amplitude will be FV,m<strong>in</strong>, which is <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
by a dashed l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.15.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage with the boundary function method is its simplicity.<br />
It is also very reliable, although a little conservative <strong>and</strong> this is<br />
especially true for non-equally spaced carriers, where the P20 level can<br />
be much lower than FV . The method has been implemented as an auxiliary<br />
method <strong>in</strong> WCAT, which is a s<strong>of</strong>tware tool orig<strong>in</strong>ally developed by<br />
the present author <strong>and</strong> Genrong Li as part <strong>of</strong> a Master’s Thesis [52] at<br />
32