12.12.2012 Views

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Boundary function Method<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the best eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g methods for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the worst case scenario<br />

for equally spaced carriers, the boundary function method, was orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

designed by Wolk et al. [51]. Unfortunately the used function was<br />

found empirically while study<strong>in</strong>g the worst case scenario with an optimisation<br />

tool, <strong>and</strong> is thus not physically founded. A consequence <strong>of</strong> this is<br />

that under certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, the boundary function produces poor<br />

results. It was also limited to work only for equally spaced carriers. However,<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> the present thesis work, this method has been further<br />

developed, <strong>and</strong> it has been found that the orig<strong>in</strong>al boundary function<br />

approximately describes a function that tries to squeeze all the energy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the multicarrier signal dur<strong>in</strong>g one envelope period <strong>in</strong>to a specified,<br />

shorter, time period. This works just as well <strong>in</strong> both the equally spaced<br />

<strong>and</strong> the non-equally spaced carrier cases <strong>and</strong> can be summarized by the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g formulas:<br />

⎧ �<br />

FV (TX) =<br />

⎪⎨<br />

FV,max = N�<br />

⎪⎩ FV,m<strong>in</strong> =<br />

TH<br />

TX<br />

Ei<br />

i=1<br />

� N�<br />

E<br />

i=1<br />

2 i<br />

N�<br />

E<br />

i=1<br />

2 i<br />

(2.29)<br />

Here TX is the time period <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, which is <strong>of</strong>ten set to T20, i.e.<br />

the time it takes the electrons to traverse the gap 20 times. TH is the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> the envelope <strong>and</strong> Ei is the voltage amplitude <strong>of</strong> each carrier.<br />

FV (TX) is the design voltage <strong>and</strong> is shown as two symmetric curved l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

<strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.15. The design voltage can never exceed the <strong>in</strong>-phase voltage,<br />

given by FV,max, <strong>and</strong> if all power is distributed evenly over the entire<br />

envelope period the voltage amplitude will be FV,m<strong>in</strong>, which is <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

by a dashed l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.15.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage with the boundary function method is its simplicity.<br />

It is also very reliable, although a little conservative <strong>and</strong> this is<br />

especially true for non-equally spaced carriers, where the P20 level can<br />

be much lower than FV . The method has been implemented as an auxiliary<br />

method <strong>in</strong> WCAT, which is a s<strong>of</strong>tware tool orig<strong>in</strong>ally developed by<br />

the present author <strong>and</strong> Genrong Li as part <strong>of</strong> a Master’s Thesis [52] at<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!