12.12.2012 Views

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

Multipactor in Low Pressure Gas and in ... - of Richard Udiljak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

est achievable radial position for an electron emitted from the outer<br />

conductor, provided that the oscillations are not too large. The expression<br />

for the m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> R(t) will be a function <strong>of</strong> the field amplitude,<br />

the frequency, the <strong>in</strong>itial electron velocity as well as the <strong>in</strong>itial phase,<br />

α = ωt0:<br />

Rm<strong>in</strong> = ΛRo(Λ 2 + 2Λ 2 cos α 2 + 4Λcos αv0ωRo + 2v 2 0ω 2 R 2 o) −1/2<br />

(5.6)<br />

However, for v0 = 0 a much more compact expression, which is <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

<strong>of</strong> field amplitude <strong>and</strong> frequency, is obta<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />

Rm<strong>in</strong> ≈<br />

Ro<br />

� 1 + 2(cos α) 2<br />

≥ Ro<br />

√3 . (5.7)<br />

This means that if the radius <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner conductor, Ri, is smaller than<br />

58% <strong>of</strong> the outer radius, Ro, then two sided multipactor is not possible<br />

when the <strong>in</strong>itial velocity is low <strong>and</strong> the oscillations are small.<br />

5.1.2 <strong>Multipactor</strong> resonance theory<br />

In a coaxial l<strong>in</strong>e, both double-sided <strong>and</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle-sided multipactor (on the<br />

outer conductor) are possible. First, double-sided discharge will be considered<br />

<strong>and</strong> typical for this is that the one way transit time corresponds<br />

to an odd <strong>in</strong>teger <strong>of</strong> half RF field periods. However, <strong>in</strong> a coaxial l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

the transit time is normally longer for electrons emitted from the outer<br />

conductor than for electrons emitted from the <strong>in</strong>ner conductor. Thus,<br />

the sum <strong>of</strong> two transits must be considered <strong>and</strong> the condition for this is<br />

that it should be an <strong>in</strong>teger number <strong>of</strong> RF periods. This is the resonance<br />

criterion <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> addition to this the phase-focus<strong>in</strong>g effect should be active,<br />

which for the parallel-plate case is given by Eqs. (2.18)- (2.21). It<br />

is <strong>in</strong>structive to compare the coaxial case with the parallel-plate case,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> the limit when the Ri ≈ Ro the coaxial <strong>and</strong> parallel-plate models<br />

should give the same results. For the parallel-plate case, when the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial velocity is neglected (v0 = 0), the phase stability range is given<br />

by the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>equalities [39],<br />

πk < λ < � (πk) 2 + 4, (5.8)<br />

where k is an odd positive <strong>in</strong>teger. The normalised gap width, λ, is<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

λ = ωd/Vω = m(ωd) 2 /eU, (5.9)<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!