07.07.2017 Views

atw 2017-06

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 6 ı June<br />

cooled, irradiated fuel assemblies. Per<br />

the initial cooling time defined in<br />

plant procedures (typically 4.5 years<br />

or three fuel cycles), the most recently<br />

cooled, irradiated fuel assemblies are<br />

transferred from the Region 1 racks to<br />

the Region 2 racks.<br />

6 Experimental determination<br />

of spray nozzle<br />

coverage and distribution<br />

A specific flow density and a uniform<br />

coverage of cooling water over a large<br />

rectangular area are required to cool<br />

fuel assemblies in the unlikely event<br />

that they become uncovered during a<br />

beyond design basis accident. The<br />

experimental testing used to determine<br />

the optimal coverage area, spray<br />

flow density and distribution of the<br />

spent fuel pool spray nozzles for cooling<br />

uncovered fuel assemblies in case<br />

of Design Condition Extensions A and<br />

B include testing different types of<br />

nozzles with different volume flow<br />

rates as the decay heat decreases with<br />

cooling time (see Region 1 and Region<br />

2 in Fig. 4). The measurement setup<br />

of the experimental testing at the<br />

Lechler GmbH Technology Center<br />

Metzingen is shown in Figure 5.<br />

• Volume Flow:<br />

variable adjustable, depending on<br />

spray nozzle type and pressure<br />

The coverage area measurements<br />

were performed by using adequate<br />

collecting canisters with the same<br />

dimensions as the rack cell canisters<br />

at specified positions (see Fig. 5).<br />

Pictures and video recording documented<br />

the testing process and resulting<br />

water distribution. An example of<br />

the measurement setup is shown in<br />

Figure 6.<br />

| | Fig. 6.<br />

Example of water distribution from a spray<br />

nozzle [4].<br />

7 Managed challenges<br />

Retrofitting the AP1000® spent fuel<br />

pool spray system to Krško Nuclear<br />

Power Plant’s existing systems and<br />

structures posed a few challenges.<br />

These included:<br />

• Planning the pipe routing and<br />

meeting the space requirements<br />

for pipe supports (see Figure 7),<br />

• Assuring pipe routing had minimal<br />

impact to equipment already existing<br />

inside of the Fuel Handling<br />

Building,<br />

• Planning the installation process<br />

for the system to meet the space<br />

requirements in the Fuel Handling<br />

Building,<br />

• Assuring the number of fuel assembly<br />

racks that cannot be used for<br />

spent fuel storage due to nozzles<br />

and/or supports which protrude<br />

into the pool are as low as possible,<br />

• Designing the retrofit system with<br />

consideration of the fuel assembly<br />

loading pattern at Krško Nuclear<br />

Power Plant to assure that the<br />

spray nozzles provide the required<br />

water spray amount, coverage and<br />

distribution to cool the spent<br />

fuel pool during Design Extension<br />

Conditions A and B.<br />

Each of these challenges was successfully<br />

resolved.<br />

8 Summary<br />

Due to requirements for nuclear<br />

power plants to withstand beyond<br />

design basis accidents, including<br />

events such as happened in 2011 in<br />

the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power<br />

Plant in Japan, alternative cooling of<br />

spent fuel is needed. Alternative spent<br />

fuel cooling can be provided by a<br />

retrofitted spent fuel pool spray<br />

system based on the AP1000® plant<br />

design. As part of Krško Nuclear Power<br />

Plant’s Safety Upgrade Program,<br />

Krško Nuclear Power Plant decided<br />

on, and Westinghouse successfully<br />

designed a retrofit of the AP1000®<br />

plant spent fuel pool spray system to<br />

provide alternative spent fuel cooling.<br />

The spent fuel pool spray system<br />

will be installed inside and outside the<br />

Fuel Handling Building. For diverse<br />

water supply, sources such as the fire<br />

protection system and river water<br />

were considered and chosen by Krško<br />

Nuclear Power Plant. The system has a<br />

robust design that employs local<br />

measurements and indicators and<br />

ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY 395<br />

| | Fig. 5.<br />

Exemplary measurement setup for experimental<br />

testing of spray nozzle coverage and<br />

distribution [4].<br />

The following conditions were<br />

applied to determine the flow density<br />

and the coverage area:<br />

• Spray height:<br />

variable adjustable, depending on<br />

local conditions around the spent<br />

fuel pool<br />

• Setting angle horizontal:<br />

variable adjustable, depending on<br />

local conditions around spent fuel<br />

pool and spray nozzle type<br />

• Pressure:<br />

variable adjustable, depending<br />

on spray nozzle type and hydraulic<br />

design of spent fuel pool spray<br />

system<br />

| | Fig. 7.<br />

Depiction of the local conditions around the Krško nuclear power plant spent fuel pool.<br />

Environment and Safety<br />

Retrofitting a Spent Fuel Pool Spray System for Alternative Cooling as a Strategy for Beyond Design Basis Events ı Christoph Hartmann and Zoran Vujic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!