You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 6 ı June<br />
cooled, irradiated fuel assemblies. Per<br />
the initial cooling time defined in<br />
plant procedures (typically 4.5 years<br />
or three fuel cycles), the most recently<br />
cooled, irradiated fuel assemblies are<br />
transferred from the Region 1 racks to<br />
the Region 2 racks.<br />
6 Experimental determination<br />
of spray nozzle<br />
coverage and distribution<br />
A specific flow density and a uniform<br />
coverage of cooling water over a large<br />
rectangular area are required to cool<br />
fuel assemblies in the unlikely event<br />
that they become uncovered during a<br />
beyond design basis accident. The<br />
experimental testing used to determine<br />
the optimal coverage area, spray<br />
flow density and distribution of the<br />
spent fuel pool spray nozzles for cooling<br />
uncovered fuel assemblies in case<br />
of Design Condition Extensions A and<br />
B include testing different types of<br />
nozzles with different volume flow<br />
rates as the decay heat decreases with<br />
cooling time (see Region 1 and Region<br />
2 in Fig. 4). The measurement setup<br />
of the experimental testing at the<br />
Lechler GmbH Technology Center<br />
Metzingen is shown in Figure 5.<br />
• Volume Flow:<br />
variable adjustable, depending on<br />
spray nozzle type and pressure<br />
The coverage area measurements<br />
were performed by using adequate<br />
collecting canisters with the same<br />
dimensions as the rack cell canisters<br />
at specified positions (see Fig. 5).<br />
Pictures and video recording documented<br />
the testing process and resulting<br />
water distribution. An example of<br />
the measurement setup is shown in<br />
Figure 6.<br />
| | Fig. 6.<br />
Example of water distribution from a spray<br />
nozzle [4].<br />
7 Managed challenges<br />
Retrofitting the AP1000® spent fuel<br />
pool spray system to Krško Nuclear<br />
Power Plant’s existing systems and<br />
structures posed a few challenges.<br />
These included:<br />
• Planning the pipe routing and<br />
meeting the space requirements<br />
for pipe supports (see Figure 7),<br />
• Assuring pipe routing had minimal<br />
impact to equipment already existing<br />
inside of the Fuel Handling<br />
Building,<br />
• Planning the installation process<br />
for the system to meet the space<br />
requirements in the Fuel Handling<br />
Building,<br />
• Assuring the number of fuel assembly<br />
racks that cannot be used for<br />
spent fuel storage due to nozzles<br />
and/or supports which protrude<br />
into the pool are as low as possible,<br />
• Designing the retrofit system with<br />
consideration of the fuel assembly<br />
loading pattern at Krško Nuclear<br />
Power Plant to assure that the<br />
spray nozzles provide the required<br />
water spray amount, coverage and<br />
distribution to cool the spent<br />
fuel pool during Design Extension<br />
Conditions A and B.<br />
Each of these challenges was successfully<br />
resolved.<br />
8 Summary<br />
Due to requirements for nuclear<br />
power plants to withstand beyond<br />
design basis accidents, including<br />
events such as happened in 2011 in<br />
the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power<br />
Plant in Japan, alternative cooling of<br />
spent fuel is needed. Alternative spent<br />
fuel cooling can be provided by a<br />
retrofitted spent fuel pool spray<br />
system based on the AP1000® plant<br />
design. As part of Krško Nuclear Power<br />
Plant’s Safety Upgrade Program,<br />
Krško Nuclear Power Plant decided<br />
on, and Westinghouse successfully<br />
designed a retrofit of the AP1000®<br />
plant spent fuel pool spray system to<br />
provide alternative spent fuel cooling.<br />
The spent fuel pool spray system<br />
will be installed inside and outside the<br />
Fuel Handling Building. For diverse<br />
water supply, sources such as the fire<br />
protection system and river water<br />
were considered and chosen by Krško<br />
Nuclear Power Plant. The system has a<br />
robust design that employs local<br />
measurements and indicators and<br />
ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY 395<br />
| | Fig. 5.<br />
Exemplary measurement setup for experimental<br />
testing of spray nozzle coverage and<br />
distribution [4].<br />
The following conditions were<br />
applied to determine the flow density<br />
and the coverage area:<br />
• Spray height:<br />
variable adjustable, depending on<br />
local conditions around the spent<br />
fuel pool<br />
• Setting angle horizontal:<br />
variable adjustable, depending on<br />
local conditions around spent fuel<br />
pool and spray nozzle type<br />
• Pressure:<br />
variable adjustable, depending<br />
on spray nozzle type and hydraulic<br />
design of spent fuel pool spray<br />
system<br />
| | Fig. 7.<br />
Depiction of the local conditions around the Krško nuclear power plant spent fuel pool.<br />
Environment and Safety<br />
Retrofitting a Spent Fuel Pool Spray System for Alternative Cooling as a Strategy for Beyond Design Basis Events ı Christoph Hartmann and Zoran Vujic