07.07.2017 Views

atw 2017-06

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 6 ı June<br />

DECOMMISSIONING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 404<br />

| | Fig. 2.<br />

Percentage differences between measured and computed nuclide compositions for Obrigheim NPP (measured at Ispra).<br />

Four samples were analyzed in both<br />

laboratories for cross-checking.<br />

The proposed method was applied<br />

to a total of 728 nuclide composition<br />

or nuclide ratio data for 17 samples<br />

measured at Ispra to identify those<br />

data that deviate significantly from<br />

other data and therefore became<br />

the candidates for detailed analysis.<br />

Various detailed analysis appropriate<br />

to identify the root causes of the<br />

significant deviation from other data<br />

were applied and described below.<br />

3.1 Burnup for GEROBRPWR-9<br />

Figure 2 shows the percentage differences<br />

between the calculated and<br />

measured nuclide composition data for<br />

the samples from Obrigheim NPP measured<br />

at the Ispra laboratory. Relatively<br />

high percentage differences between<br />

the calculated and measured data were<br />

observed for one sample, which<br />

was found to be the GEROBRPWR-9<br />

sample. According to Barbero et al.<br />

[24], the burnup for the GEROBRPWR-9<br />

sample measured at Karlsruhe using<br />

the Nd-148 method (22,700 MWd/<br />

MTU) was abnormally high compared<br />

to the burnup measured at Ispra using<br />

the Nd-148, non-destructive Cs-137,<br />

and destructive Cs-137 methods<br />

(17,130, 16,970, and 17,490 MWd/<br />

MTU, respectively). Because the<br />

burnup in the OECD/NEA SFCOMPO<br />

database was based on the measurement<br />

at Karlsruhe, the code calculation<br />

was performed again using the burnup<br />

measured at Ispra with the Nd-148<br />

method (17,130 MWd/MTU). Figure 3<br />

shows the percentage differences<br />

after the burnup correction for the<br />

GEROBRPWR-9 sample. It can be<br />

seen that the deviations of the<br />

GEROBRPWR-9 sample from other<br />

samples were properly corrected.<br />

Figure 3 also identifies those<br />

nuclide composition or nuclide ratio<br />

data that need to be analyzed in more<br />

detail. The Pu-241/Pu-239 ratio<br />

shows relatively high percentage<br />

differences. The percentage differences<br />

of Cs-137/U-238 ratio are<br />

divided into two groups. A large<br />

uncertainty and a large deviation in<br />

percentage differences are observed<br />

for Am-241 and Am-242, respectively.<br />

Detailed analysis on each of the<br />

identified nuclide composition or<br />

nuclide ratio data are described in the<br />

following sections.<br />

3.2 Cooling time of plutonium<br />

isotopes<br />

As indicated in Fig. 3, the Pu-241/<br />

Pu-239 ratio was found to have<br />

higher percentage differences among<br />

samples than other nuclide ratios.<br />

Barbero et al. [24], the original source<br />

of the measurement data, reported<br />

the nuclide ratios of uranium and<br />

plutonium with the dates of the<br />

measurements. The actual cooling time<br />

of the samples can be calculated from<br />

the date of discharge (August 16, 1974)<br />

and the date of measurement (e.g.,<br />

April 12, 1978 for GEROBRPWR-3).<br />

However, the cooling times of the<br />

data were specified as zero in the<br />

OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database,<br />

which means that the data were<br />

adjusted to the time of discharge. The<br />

code calculations were performed<br />

assuming that the cooling times of<br />

the samples were zero. Because the<br />

half-life of Pu-241 (14.325 years) is<br />

comparable with the cooling time of<br />

the samples, a non-negligible amount<br />

of Pu-241 decayed out; therefore, the<br />

calculated Pu-241/Pu-239 ratios were<br />

higher than the measured ones.<br />

| | Fig. 3.<br />

Percentage differences between measured and computed nuclide compositions for Obrigheim NPP (measured at Ispra) after burnup<br />

correction for GEROBRPWR-9 sample.<br />

3.3 Possible errors during<br />

Cs-137/U-238 ratio calculation<br />

from measured data<br />

As indicated in Fig. 3, the Cs-137/<br />

U-238 ratios were found to fall into<br />

two groups. One group consists of 5<br />

samples with very small percentage<br />

differences, and the other group consists<br />

of 12 samples with percentage<br />

differences of up to −35 %. The existence<br />

of two distinct groups motivated<br />

a detailed analysis considering possible<br />

systematic errors in the data.<br />

Figure 4 shows the amounts of<br />

Cs-137 buildup and the remaining<br />

U-238 in the spent nuclear fuel per<br />

metric ton of final uranium. As a<br />

burnup monitor, the amount of Cs-137<br />

buildup shows a linear relationship<br />

with the burnup. Although the<br />

amount of U-238 remaining shows a<br />

Decommissioning and Waste Management<br />

Validation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Nuclide Composition Data Using Percentage Differences and Detailed Analysis ı Man Cheol Kim

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!