Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 6 ı June<br />
DECOMMISSIONING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 404<br />
| | Fig. 2.<br />
Percentage differences between measured and computed nuclide compositions for Obrigheim NPP (measured at Ispra).<br />
Four samples were analyzed in both<br />
laboratories for cross-checking.<br />
The proposed method was applied<br />
to a total of 728 nuclide composition<br />
or nuclide ratio data for 17 samples<br />
measured at Ispra to identify those<br />
data that deviate significantly from<br />
other data and therefore became<br />
the candidates for detailed analysis.<br />
Various detailed analysis appropriate<br />
to identify the root causes of the<br />
significant deviation from other data<br />
were applied and described below.<br />
3.1 Burnup for GEROBRPWR-9<br />
Figure 2 shows the percentage differences<br />
between the calculated and<br />
measured nuclide composition data for<br />
the samples from Obrigheim NPP measured<br />
at the Ispra laboratory. Relatively<br />
high percentage differences between<br />
the calculated and measured data were<br />
observed for one sample, which<br />
was found to be the GEROBRPWR-9<br />
sample. According to Barbero et al.<br />
[24], the burnup for the GEROBRPWR-9<br />
sample measured at Karlsruhe using<br />
the Nd-148 method (22,700 MWd/<br />
MTU) was abnormally high compared<br />
to the burnup measured at Ispra using<br />
the Nd-148, non-destructive Cs-137,<br />
and destructive Cs-137 methods<br />
(17,130, 16,970, and 17,490 MWd/<br />
MTU, respectively). Because the<br />
burnup in the OECD/NEA SFCOMPO<br />
database was based on the measurement<br />
at Karlsruhe, the code calculation<br />
was performed again using the burnup<br />
measured at Ispra with the Nd-148<br />
method (17,130 MWd/MTU). Figure 3<br />
shows the percentage differences<br />
after the burnup correction for the<br />
GEROBRPWR-9 sample. It can be<br />
seen that the deviations of the<br />
GEROBRPWR-9 sample from other<br />
samples were properly corrected.<br />
Figure 3 also identifies those<br />
nuclide composition or nuclide ratio<br />
data that need to be analyzed in more<br />
detail. The Pu-241/Pu-239 ratio<br />
shows relatively high percentage<br />
differences. The percentage differences<br />
of Cs-137/U-238 ratio are<br />
divided into two groups. A large<br />
uncertainty and a large deviation in<br />
percentage differences are observed<br />
for Am-241 and Am-242, respectively.<br />
Detailed analysis on each of the<br />
identified nuclide composition or<br />
nuclide ratio data are described in the<br />
following sections.<br />
3.2 Cooling time of plutonium<br />
isotopes<br />
As indicated in Fig. 3, the Pu-241/<br />
Pu-239 ratio was found to have<br />
higher percentage differences among<br />
samples than other nuclide ratios.<br />
Barbero et al. [24], the original source<br />
of the measurement data, reported<br />
the nuclide ratios of uranium and<br />
plutonium with the dates of the<br />
measurements. The actual cooling time<br />
of the samples can be calculated from<br />
the date of discharge (August 16, 1974)<br />
and the date of measurement (e.g.,<br />
April 12, 1978 for GEROBRPWR-3).<br />
However, the cooling times of the<br />
data were specified as zero in the<br />
OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database,<br />
which means that the data were<br />
adjusted to the time of discharge. The<br />
code calculations were performed<br />
assuming that the cooling times of<br />
the samples were zero. Because the<br />
half-life of Pu-241 (14.325 years) is<br />
comparable with the cooling time of<br />
the samples, a non-negligible amount<br />
of Pu-241 decayed out; therefore, the<br />
calculated Pu-241/Pu-239 ratios were<br />
higher than the measured ones.<br />
| | Fig. 3.<br />
Percentage differences between measured and computed nuclide compositions for Obrigheim NPP (measured at Ispra) after burnup<br />
correction for GEROBRPWR-9 sample.<br />
3.3 Possible errors during<br />
Cs-137/U-238 ratio calculation<br />
from measured data<br />
As indicated in Fig. 3, the Cs-137/<br />
U-238 ratios were found to fall into<br />
two groups. One group consists of 5<br />
samples with very small percentage<br />
differences, and the other group consists<br />
of 12 samples with percentage<br />
differences of up to −35 %. The existence<br />
of two distinct groups motivated<br />
a detailed analysis considering possible<br />
systematic errors in the data.<br />
Figure 4 shows the amounts of<br />
Cs-137 buildup and the remaining<br />
U-238 in the spent nuclear fuel per<br />
metric ton of final uranium. As a<br />
burnup monitor, the amount of Cs-137<br />
buildup shows a linear relationship<br />
with the burnup. Although the<br />
amount of U-238 remaining shows a<br />
Decommissioning and Waste Management<br />
Validation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Nuclide Composition Data Using Percentage Differences and Detailed Analysis ı Man Cheol Kim