You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 6 ı June<br />
| | Fig. 1.<br />
Distribution of U-235 initial enrichment and burnup of 246 samples in OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database.<br />
constant power history, comparison of<br />
the measured data and code calculation<br />
results, and detailed analysis of<br />
those data that deviate significantly<br />
from other data to identify the causes<br />
of the deviations. During such a crosscheck<br />
process, many, if not all, of the<br />
errors in either the measured data<br />
or the code calculations could be<br />
identified. The proposed method is<br />
described in Section 2. The application<br />
of the proposed method to<br />
nuclide composition data of spent<br />
nuclear fuels from Obrigheim NPP is<br />
described in Section 3, and the identified<br />
data and associated findings are<br />
analyzed in detail. Section 4 presents<br />
the conclusion of this paper.<br />
2 Approach to validation<br />
of nuclide composition<br />
data<br />
2.1 Overview of the data in<br />
the SFCOMPO database<br />
The OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database<br />
provides 10,282 measurement data<br />
from 246 samples of nuclear fuels<br />
irradiated in 14 reactors. Figure 1<br />
shows the distribution of the U-235<br />
initial enrichment and burnup of 246<br />
samples in the SFCOMPO database.<br />
The initial enrichment ranges from<br />
1.45 wt % for the samples from<br />
Fukushima-Daiichi-3 and Monticello<br />
to 4.11 wt % for those from<br />
Takahama-3, and is concentrated<br />
in the range from 2.5 to 3.5 wt %.<br />
The burnup ranges from 2.21 to<br />
71.84 GWd/MTU. Note, however, that<br />
the samples from Monticello show<br />
exceptionally high burnup (exceeding<br />
40 MWd/MTU) despite the low initial<br />
U-235 enrichment. Owing to this<br />
abnormal overburn of low-enriched<br />
fuels, Hermann et al. [15] rated<br />
the data from Monticello as ‘not<br />
recommended.’ If the samples from<br />
Monticello are excluded, the burnup<br />
ranges from 2.21 to 47.3 GWd/MTU.<br />
2.2 Approach to validation<br />
Nuclide composition data of spent<br />
nuclear fuels such as those in the<br />
OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database can<br />
be validated using the percentage<br />
differences between the computed<br />
and measured compositions of each<br />
isotope in each sample. Here, the<br />
percentage difference is defined as the<br />
calculated value minus the measured<br />
value, divided by the measured<br />
quantities or ratios, as follows:<br />
(1)<br />
The percentage difference has been<br />
used in many code validation studies<br />
such as those of Hermann et al. [16],<br />
DeHart and Hermann [17], and Jang<br />
et al. [18]. By reviewing the percentage<br />
differences of nuclide compositions<br />
or ratios, candidates for<br />
detailed analysis can be identified.<br />
The identified candidates can be<br />
subjected to detailed analyses such as<br />
consistency checks as a function of<br />
burnup or parent–daughter pairs, as<br />
performed by Gauld and Rugama [8],<br />
and the original data sources can be<br />
reviewed.<br />
2.3 Code calculations<br />
As mentioned in the state-of-the-art<br />
report by EGADSNF [9], evaluation of<br />
the measured data in the SFCOMPO<br />
database requires significant effort<br />
and is therefore a significant but<br />
challenging objective of future activities<br />
of the EGADSNF. Thus, using<br />
simplified models in code calculations<br />
would be more efficient for performing<br />
a large number of code<br />
calculations in a manageable and unified<br />
way than using detailed models.<br />
For this reason, code calculations<br />
were performed using ORIGEN-ARP<br />
[19,20]. Consequently, the code<br />
calculations were performed mainly<br />
based on important parameters such<br />
as the fuel assembly type, initial<br />
enrichment, burnup, operation<br />
history, and cooling time of the samples.<br />
Fast et al. [5] compared the code<br />
calculation results of the ARP model<br />
(simple and fast) and the NEWT<br />
model (compli cated and precise) for a<br />
sample from Obrigheim NPP and<br />
found that the percentage differences<br />
for most nuclides are within 20 % for<br />
the APR model and within 10 % for<br />
the NEWT model. To make code<br />
calculations for a large number of<br />
samples, the use of ORIGEN-ARP<br />
provides an efficient way of calculating<br />
nuclide compositions with sufficient<br />
precision.<br />
2.4 Consideration of operation<br />
history<br />
The degree of detail in the irradiation<br />
history varies among the 14 reactors<br />
in the OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database.<br />
Very detailed information on the<br />
cycle number, elapsed time, time<br />
interval, core power density, bundle<br />
power density, and so on is provided<br />
for Cooper NPP. On the other hand, no<br />
information is available for JPDR-I,<br />
Tsuruga-1, and Takahama-3 NPPs in<br />
the SFCOMPO database. The operation<br />
history of Takahama-3 NPP is<br />
available in NUREG/CR-6798 [21].<br />
Research has found that code<br />
calculations of nuclide compositions<br />
are not significantly affected by the<br />
detailed power history. Chabert et al.<br />
[22] and Nakahara et al. [23] compared<br />
the nuclide compositions of<br />
spent fuels obtained using the accurate<br />
power history and an assumed<br />
constant power history, and found<br />
that the principal uranium and<br />
plutonium isotopes and other fission<br />
products are not significantly affected<br />
by the power history. Based on these<br />
findings, a constant power history was<br />
assumed as a reasonable approximation<br />
instead of the accurate power<br />
history, which was available for only a<br />
limited number of samples.<br />
3 Application to Obrigheim<br />
NPP Nuclide Composition<br />
Data<br />
A total of 1,153 nuclide composition<br />
or nuclide ratio data were provided<br />
for 23 samples from Obrigheim NPP.<br />
The samples were analyzed at two<br />
different laboratories, Ispra and<br />
Karlsruhe. Ispra analyzed 17 samples,<br />
and Karlsruhe analyzed 10 samples.<br />
DECOMMISSIONING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 403<br />
Decommissioning and Waste Management<br />
Validation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Nuclide Composition Data Using Percentage Differences and Detailed Analysis ı Man Cheol Kim