07.07.2017 Views

atw 2017-06

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 6 ı June<br />

| | Fig. 1.<br />

Distribution of U-235 initial enrichment and burnup of 246 samples in OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database.<br />

constant power history, comparison of<br />

the measured data and code calculation<br />

results, and detailed analysis of<br />

those data that deviate significantly<br />

from other data to identify the causes<br />

of the deviations. During such a crosscheck<br />

process, many, if not all, of the<br />

errors in either the measured data<br />

or the code calculations could be<br />

identified. The proposed method is<br />

described in Section 2. The application<br />

of the proposed method to<br />

nuclide composition data of spent<br />

nuclear fuels from Obrigheim NPP is<br />

described in Section 3, and the identified<br />

data and associated findings are<br />

analyzed in detail. Section 4 presents<br />

the conclusion of this paper.<br />

2 Approach to validation<br />

of nuclide composition<br />

data<br />

2.1 Overview of the data in<br />

the SFCOMPO database<br />

The OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database<br />

provides 10,282 measurement data<br />

from 246 samples of nuclear fuels<br />

irradiated in 14 reactors. Figure 1<br />

shows the distribution of the U-235<br />

initial enrichment and burnup of 246<br />

samples in the SFCOMPO database.<br />

The initial enrichment ranges from<br />

1.45 wt % for the samples from<br />

Fukushima-Daiichi-3 and Monticello<br />

to 4.11 wt % for those from<br />

Takahama-3, and is concentrated<br />

in the range from 2.5 to 3.5 wt %.<br />

The burnup ranges from 2.21 to<br />

71.84 GWd/MTU. Note, however, that<br />

the samples from Monticello show<br />

exceptionally high burnup (exceeding<br />

40 MWd/MTU) despite the low initial<br />

U-235 enrichment. Owing to this<br />

abnormal overburn of low-enriched<br />

fuels, Hermann et al. [15] rated<br />

the data from Monticello as ‘not<br />

recommended.’ If the samples from<br />

Monticello are excluded, the burnup<br />

ranges from 2.21 to 47.3 GWd/MTU.<br />

2.2 Approach to validation<br />

Nuclide composition data of spent<br />

nuclear fuels such as those in the<br />

OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database can<br />

be validated using the percentage<br />

differences between the computed<br />

and measured compositions of each<br />

isotope in each sample. Here, the<br />

percentage difference is defined as the<br />

calculated value minus the measured<br />

value, divided by the measured<br />

quantities or ratios, as follows:<br />

(1)<br />

The percentage difference has been<br />

used in many code validation studies<br />

such as those of Hermann et al. [16],<br />

DeHart and Hermann [17], and Jang<br />

et al. [18]. By reviewing the percentage<br />

differences of nuclide compositions<br />

or ratios, candidates for<br />

detailed analysis can be identified.<br />

The identified candidates can be<br />

subjected to detailed analyses such as<br />

consistency checks as a function of<br />

burnup or parent–daughter pairs, as<br />

performed by Gauld and Rugama [8],<br />

and the original data sources can be<br />

reviewed.<br />

2.3 Code calculations<br />

As mentioned in the state-of-the-art<br />

report by EGADSNF [9], evaluation of<br />

the measured data in the SFCOMPO<br />

database requires significant effort<br />

and is therefore a significant but<br />

challenging objective of future activities<br />

of the EGADSNF. Thus, using<br />

simplified models in code calculations<br />

would be more efficient for performing<br />

a large number of code<br />

calculations in a manageable and unified<br />

way than using detailed models.<br />

For this reason, code calculations<br />

were performed using ORIGEN-ARP<br />

[19,20]. Consequently, the code<br />

calculations were performed mainly<br />

based on important parameters such<br />

as the fuel assembly type, initial<br />

enrichment, burnup, operation<br />

history, and cooling time of the samples.<br />

Fast et al. [5] compared the code<br />

calculation results of the ARP model<br />

(simple and fast) and the NEWT<br />

model (compli cated and precise) for a<br />

sample from Obrigheim NPP and<br />

found that the percentage differences<br />

for most nuclides are within 20 % for<br />

the APR model and within 10 % for<br />

the NEWT model. To make code<br />

calculations for a large number of<br />

samples, the use of ORIGEN-ARP<br />

provides an efficient way of calculating<br />

nuclide compositions with sufficient<br />

precision.<br />

2.4 Consideration of operation<br />

history<br />

The degree of detail in the irradiation<br />

history varies among the 14 reactors<br />

in the OECD/NEA SFCOMPO database.<br />

Very detailed information on the<br />

cycle number, elapsed time, time<br />

interval, core power density, bundle<br />

power density, and so on is provided<br />

for Cooper NPP. On the other hand, no<br />

information is available for JPDR-I,<br />

Tsuruga-1, and Takahama-3 NPPs in<br />

the SFCOMPO database. The operation<br />

history of Takahama-3 NPP is<br />

available in NUREG/CR-6798 [21].<br />

Research has found that code<br />

calculations of nuclide compositions<br />

are not significantly affected by the<br />

detailed power history. Chabert et al.<br />

[22] and Nakahara et al. [23] compared<br />

the nuclide compositions of<br />

spent fuels obtained using the accurate<br />

power history and an assumed<br />

constant power history, and found<br />

that the principal uranium and<br />

plutonium isotopes and other fission<br />

products are not significantly affected<br />

by the power history. Based on these<br />

findings, a constant power history was<br />

assumed as a reasonable approximation<br />

instead of the accurate power<br />

history, which was available for only a<br />

limited number of samples.<br />

3 Application to Obrigheim<br />

NPP Nuclide Composition<br />

Data<br />

A total of 1,153 nuclide composition<br />

or nuclide ratio data were provided<br />

for 23 samples from Obrigheim NPP.<br />

The samples were analyzed at two<br />

different laboratories, Ispra and<br />

Karlsruhe. Ispra analyzed 17 samples,<br />

and Karlsruhe analyzed 10 samples.<br />

DECOMMISSIONING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 403<br />

Decommissioning and Waste Management<br />

Validation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Nuclide Composition Data Using Percentage Differences and Detailed Analysis ı Man Cheol Kim

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!