11.08.2017 Views

Banking for 7 billion and 7 million

New challenges and opportunities of globalization Global Investor, 03/2006 Credit Suisse

New challenges and opportunities of globalization
Global Investor, 03/2006
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 3.06 Basics — 28<br />

In recent years, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have enjoyed<br />

success around the globe. REITs have not only achieved strong<br />

returns in absolute terms, they have also outper<strong>for</strong>med the equity<br />

<strong>and</strong> fixed income markets in many countries. Figure 1 illustrates the<br />

long-term evolution of REITs relative to local stocks <strong>and</strong> government<br />

bonds in the USA, Australia <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. For Australia <strong>and</strong><br />

the USA, we can see quite a strong outper<strong>for</strong>mance of REITs versus<br />

equities <strong>and</strong> bonds since 1990. For the USA, a dollar invested<br />

in bonds in 1990 has tripled in value <strong>and</strong> a dollar invested in equities<br />

has quadrupled. Invested in REITs, however, the same dollar is<br />

now worth nearly eight times as much.<br />

All in all, this analysis shows that REITs have been established<br />

as a good alternative to the other two traditional asset classes. As<br />

a consequence of their popularity, REITs were also introduced in<br />

Japan (in 2001), Singapore (2002) <strong>and</strong> France (2003). We expect<br />

REITs to spread further around the globe. The UK has introduced<br />

REIT legislation that opens the way <strong>for</strong> UK REITs from 2007 onward.<br />

The discussion about introducing REITs has also intensified in Germany.<br />

The potential <strong>for</strong> the growth of Germany’s publicly quoted<br />

real estate sector is not only reflected in the growing attraction of<br />

the real estate market, but also by structural issues. On the one<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, a large amount of real estate stock is still in the possession<br />

of non-real-estate-related companies or public institutions in Germany<br />

that would like to generate additional cash by selling their<br />

real estate portfolios. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the listed sector is still<br />

very small. The amount of real estate in the possession of German<br />

real estate companies is only about half a percent of commercial<br />

real estate stock. This is quite a low value by international comparison.<br />

The average is around 3% in Europe <strong>and</strong> around 10% in<br />

the USA <strong>and</strong> Asia.<br />

Figure 1<br />

REITs relative to local equities <strong>and</strong> government bonds<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06<br />

US REITs vs stocks<br />

AUS REITs vs stocks<br />

Source: Global Property Research, Bloomberg, Credit Suisse<br />

REIT per<strong>for</strong>mance vs. stocks <strong>and</strong> bonds<br />

REITs have outper<strong>for</strong>med stocks <strong>and</strong> bonds in Australia <strong>and</strong> the USA since<br />

1990. In the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, they have generated around the same returns as<br />

local stocks <strong>and</strong> bonds in the same period.<br />

NL REITs vs stocks<br />

US REITs vs bonds<br />

AUS REITs vs bonds<br />

NL REITs vs bonds<br />

Favorable correlation properties<br />

Besides the general favorable outlook, REITs are attractive <strong>for</strong><br />

investors due to their portfolio-optimizing characteristics. The benefits<br />

of a well-diversified portfolio were brought back to investors’<br />

attention in light of the increased financial market volatility this<br />

summer. As asset prices came under pressure on the back of<br />

increased inflation risks <strong>and</strong> uncertainties about rate hikes, REITs<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med quite well relative to other asset classes. REITs’ defensive<br />

investment strategy <strong>and</strong> their relatively high income yields<br />

have provided a cushion in times of increased risk. In addition,<br />

the inflation indexation of rents is likely to have supported prices<br />

of REITs. In most countries, leases <strong>for</strong> both office <strong>and</strong> retail properties<br />

are inflation indexed <strong>and</strong> thus offer investors inflation<br />

protection.<br />

Due to their favorable portfolio-optimizing characteristics, REITs<br />

should be considered <strong>for</strong> inclusion in portfolios. The main advantage<br />

is a lower correlation to shares <strong>and</strong> bonds. Put more simply,<br />

REIT prices do not always move in t<strong>and</strong>em with the movements<br />

of other asset classes. True, they sometimes move in the same<br />

direction, but often not as strongly <strong>and</strong> at times even move in the<br />

opposite direction of other asset classes. As the diversification potential<br />

of REITs can vary strongly depending on the market environment,<br />

we have taken a look at the correlation between REITs <strong>and</strong><br />

equities as well as bonds in various countries. Table 1 shows our<br />

Table 1<br />

Source: Credit Suisse<br />

REITs, equities <strong>and</strong> bonds<br />

Correlations currently vary across different countries. The strongest<br />

correlation to equities is in the USA, <strong>and</strong> the strongest correlation to bond<br />

yields is in the USA, Australia <strong>and</strong> Canada.<br />

Yields on 10-year bonds<br />

Equity markets<br />

USA – ++<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s 0 +<br />

France 0 +<br />

Japan 0 0<br />

Australia – 0<br />

Canada – 0<br />

++ = correlation coefficient higher than 0.5, + = correlation coefficient 0.5 to 0.2,<br />

0 = correlation coefficient 0.2 to –0.2, – = correlation coefficient –0.2 to –0.4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!