24.11.2017 Views

Abelian Groups - László Fuchs [Springer]

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 3 Direct Sums of Cyclic <strong>Groups</strong><br />

Theorem 8.14 (Raynaud–Gruson). A group is Mittag-Leffler if and only if it is<br />

@ 1 -cyclic.<br />

Proof. We start the proof by showing that M is Mittag-Leffler if and only if each<br />

of its countable pure subgroups is Mittag-Leffler. One direction the claim follows<br />

from Lemma 8.13.<br />

For the converse, assume maps P n<br />

jD1 .x j ˝ b j /.x j 2 M; b j 2 Q A i / to 0. Then<br />

by Lemma 1.12 in Chapter 8 and by the remark after it, the same sum vanishes in<br />

.M 0 ˝ Q A i / for a countable pure subgroup M 0 M containing the x j ’s. Hence<br />

M cannot be Mittag-Leffler if its countable pure subgroups are not, but it is if its<br />

countable pure subgroups are Mittag-Leffler.<br />

It remains to prove that countable Mittag-Leffler groups are †-cyclic. Suppose<br />

N is a countable p-group which has elements ¤ 0 of infinite p-heights. Clearly, all<br />

non-zero elements of Q n2N .N ˝Z.pn // have finite p-heights. However, Q n2N Z.pn /<br />

has summands Š J p ,soN ˝ Qn2N Z.pn / has summands Š N ˝ J p Š N with<br />

elements of infinite heights. Thus N is not Mittag-Leffler. A countable Mittag-<br />

Leffler group must therefore have separable p-components, so its torsion subgroup<br />

is †-cyclic.<br />

Next, let M be of finite torsion-free rank n >0such that M=tM is not finitely<br />

generated. Then M contains a subgroup N such that N=tM Š Z n and M=N is an<br />

infinite torsion group. First assume M=N is reduced. Then it is †-cyclic of the form<br />

˚i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!